New Trash Carrow from the ordinary St. Petersburg librarian Ivan Schulz In his irregular heading “Satan Library”, Ivan Schulz shares with readers of “Gorky” books that they will never pick up in their hands, but with which he has to work on duty. In today's issue, read about the stories about the elemental of the Moscow metro and the Popadan rockers, the criminal trache of the 90s and other horrors of the domestic book publishing.

The most interesting new products of the week: Choice of "Gorky" A jump to mass graves, human in the inhuman, the history of cosmology, the immortality of the soul, as well as the dwelling of Petersburgers in the direct speech of the Petersburgers themselves. As usual, on Fridays, Ivan Navparenko tells about the most noticeable book novelties. There is no death. A brief story of an unofficial military search in Russia. M.: Common Place, 2020.

Fragment from the book of Polina Loseva about modern theories of aging People dream of extending life for more than one hundred years, but so far scientists cannot even agree on what to consider old age. Nevertheless, gerontology has already stood out in a separate discipline - the book of Polina Loseva, published with the support of “Book projects of Dmitry Zimin” and the Evolution Foundation, invites the reader to get to know this science better. Gorky publishes a fragment of the book.

Ten facts from a new book about people on the moon Many today believe that a person’s leg never stepped on the surface of the moon, the Apollo program did not exist, since all this is the result of the conspiracy of the scientific community and the US authorities. Vitaly Egorov’s book once again explains why this is not so. Gorky, together with the Enlightener Prize, chose the ten most interesting facts from it. Vitaly Egorov. People on the moon. The main answers. M.: Alpina Non-Fikshn, 2020 1.

From the book “Venice. History of water and land" Cardinal-Inquisitor Bellarmine, who led the first trial of Galileo Galilei, ruled that Copernicus' ideas were erroneous on the basis of a literalist reading of the texts of Holy Scripture, rare for theologians of that time. Since Galileo did not admit the correctness of this verdict and later again defended Copernicanism, this led to a second trial of him, during which the scientist was forced to publicly renounce his own views.