The Central District Court of Voronezh found civil activist and candidate for State Duma deputy from Yabloko Pavel Sychev guilty of the article on displaying Nazi symbols (Part 1 of Article 20.3 of the Administrative Code). He was sentenced to five days of arrest and banned from participating in elections. He himself told OVD-Info about this. Protocol against a politician due to a publication on the Free People of Voronezh channel depicting Vladimir Putin in a Nazi uniform.

The Leninsky District Court of Rostov-on-Don terminated the criminal case brought against a 17-year-old local resident due to the announcement of a rally in support of Navalny and imposed a court fine of 30,000 rubles. This is reported by Mediazona with reference to the press service of the court. The minor was accused under the article on incitement to riots (part 3 of article 212 of the Criminal Code).

In Murmansk, the police detained the head of the Violetta’s election headquarters Grudina Natalia Zamorskaya, as well as two volunteers Denis Lashchin and Vasilisa Munina. This was reported to the OTD-Info by the sternum itself. The reason for the detention was leaflets that activists stuck - police officers saw extremism in them.

Because of his appeal to an official, a criminal case was opened against a Kaliningrad resident, and an activist from Kemerovo had his administrative arrest lifted after Putin left the city. We talk about the main news for July 8th. The court upheld the sentence of Stanislav Akhmedov, a defendant in the “palace case.” He was sentenced to two years in prison under the article on the use of violence against a representative of government.

The Kuntsevo Court of Moscow has arrested Pussy Riot member Maria Alekhina for 15 days. This is reported by Open Media with reference to the Apology of Protest lawyer Alexander Aldaev, who defended Alyokhina in court. The police detained the activist on July 7 after leaving the detention center, where she was serving 15 days of administrative arrest. A protocol was drawn up against her under the article on disobedience to the police (Article 19.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses).

The Oktyabrsky District Court of St. Petersburg fined 300 thousand rubles under the law on foreign agents (Part 1 of Article 19.34) the Fund for the Protection of Citizens' Rights - a legal entity created after the liquidation of the Anti-Corruption Fund (FBK). FZPG director Olga Guseva was also fined 100 thousand rubles. This was reported by the press service of the city courts, and Mediazona drew attention to this.

The Southern District Military Court of Rostov-on-Don extended the preventive measure for the person involved in the Hizb ut-Tahrir case, Crimean Tatar Ismet Ibragimov, until October 24. It is reported by "Crimean solidarity". Now Ibragimov is in SIZO-1 in Rostov-on-Don.

In Sochi, the prosecutor's office requested 480 hours of compulsory work for the head of the "Southern Human Rights Center" Semyon Simonov. He is accused of non-execution of a court decision due to non-payment of a fine imposed for refusing to register the organization as a foreign agent. This was reported by the head of the international human rights group "Agora" Pavel Chikov. The Southern Human Rights Center specialized in helping migrants.

Actionist Pavel Krisevich, who is currently in custody, was transferred to pre-trial detention center-2 “Butyrka”. This was reported by the telegram channel “Freedom for Krisevich!” Previously, the activist was in pre-trial detention center No. 7 “Kapotnya”. He was sent there in June by decision of the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow.

The Central District Court of Tver dismissed the case under the "rally" article against the deputy of the regional parliament from the Communist Party Artem Goncharov. It is reported by SOTA with reference to the deputy's lawyer. The police detained Goncharov because of the march on May 1, a protocol was drawn up against him under the article on violation of the rules for organizing a public event (part 2 of article 20.2 of the Administrative Code).

Civil activist Sergei Rednikov was again denied permission by the Kaluga authorities to approve a picket against political repressions. He himself informed OVD-Info about this. According to the activist, on July 6 he filed a notice to approve the picket scheduled for July 10. In the document, he listed three places where he would like to hold a protest action: in the Peace Square, on Victory Square and on Theater Square.

Ust-Vovsky District Court in Komi recognized the dismissal of teacher Nikita Tushkinov, who on January 23 with a picket for freedom of speech. This was reported by North. Realiy. On January 23, promotions were held throughout the country in support of Alexei Navalny. Tushkin himself stated that his picket with events in defense of the politician was in no way connected. The 27-year-old teacher of history and social studies filed a lawsuit against the leadership of school No.

In Kaliningrad, a criminal case was opened against a local resident who published a video with an appeal to the head of the regional Rospotrebnadzor, Elena Babur. This is reported by "New Kaliningrad" with reference to the press service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The defendant in the case of insulting the authorities (Article 319 of the Criminal Code) was a 38-year-old previously convicted Kaliningrader.

The court recognized the lawful searches at the "Team 29" and the lawyer Ivan Pavlov. this The human rights organization reported on its Telegram channel. Lawyers filed an appeal against the search warrant, which took place on April 30 in Pavlov’s hotel room and his apartment in St. Petersburg, in the Team 29 office and at the IT specialist of the project, Igor Dorfman.

The Zavodsky District Court in Kemerovo, at an appeal hearing, overturned the arrest of the former head of Navalny’s local headquarters, Stanislav Kalinichenko, appointed before Vladimir Putin’s visit to the city. Mediazona reports this. On July 5, Kalinichenko was detained and arrested for 10 days. The formal reason for the administrative punishment was the alleged failure to pay alimony (Article 5.35.1 of the Administrative Code).