Round table "OZ", November 5, 2002 Participants: Sergey Nedoroslev (president of the Kaskol group of companies), Viktor Samoilov (general director of VO Avtopromimport), Ivan Silaev (president of the International Union of Mechanical Engineers), Boris Kuzyk (general director of the holding company “New Programs and Concepts”). Presenter: Vitaly Shlykov (Adviser to the General Director of OJSC United Machine-Building Plants ( Uralmash-Izhora Group)). Round table questions: 1.V.

Linguistic law Until now I have had little interest in legislative activities. However, suddenly, like many other linguists, he found himself involved, if not in it itself, then at least in discussions about it. This happened after our deputies started talking about the Russian language law. For some time, the law was being prepared, accompanied by speeches by its initiators, and then it easily began to pass reading after reading, despite quite strong criticism in the media.

Historically, the judicial power arose much earlier than the prosecutor's office. In Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome, the victim of a crime or civil tort himself collected evidence and supported the accusation in court or invited speakers to do this. In the later period of Roman history (1st–4th centuries AD), criminal prosecution was carried out by officials of the emperor.

* David Garland is considered one of the leading sociologists working on crime and criminal punishment. After graduating from the University of Edinburgh in 1977, he taught at the Law School there, received his doctorate in 1984 and has been head of the department since 1992. Since 1997, he has been a professor at New York University School of Law. He also teaches courses in social theory and criminology at New York University's College of Arts and Sciences.

The judicial authorities in the ancient Russian state included the community court, which considered cases on the basis of customary law. During the period of Russian Pravda, most cases, especially those that were punishable by “flow and plunder,” began to be considered by the prince and his proxies. Moreover, the property of the convicted person passed to the prince, and not to the community.

World justice in modern Russia arose during the implementation of the Concept of judicial reform in the RSFSR, approved at the end of 1991. It provided for the creation of magistrates' courts as courts of first instance, in which the magistrate judge hears cases individually.

Map of political theories Ronald Dworkin (b. 1931) is one of the most famous American legal philosophers and an influential representative of modern American and British liberal thought. Dworkin's philosophical position is determined by his critical attitude towards both positivist and utilitarian concepts of law. His antipositivism stems from the thesis that law is not reducible solely to a system of rules, but has deeper foundations.

To typologize the legal systems existing in the world, which are distinguished by their extreme diversity, modern science offers various schemes. Among them, the following has received the greatest recognition in the scientific literature [1] : 1.Legal systems based on canon law. In particular, the systems of Muslim, Jewish, Hindu law. 2.Traditionalist legal systems. In their formation, they rely primarily on folk customs and traditions that permeate public and state life.

Analysis for the period from January 2000 to November 2002 The first step of the research is the selection of articles from the regional and central press about the state of the Russian judiciary. The articles were selected evenly throughout the entire period of time under consideration in order to avoid the predominance of any specific features that are not inherent to the entire period, but only to any month, quarter or year.

Since November 2002, the State Duma of the Russian Federation has been actively involved in language issues. In mid-November, a law was adopted to introduce amendments to the Law “On the Languages ​​of the Peoples of the Russian Federation”, and in early February 2003, the Law “On the State Language of the Russian Federation” was adopted, which, however, was not approved by the Federation Council (it was sent to the conciliation commission ).

Recently one of the French lawyers defended a small trial, one of those trials that goes unnoticed because there are no names in it that have become notorious. Having previously defended the opposing side, the lawyer made a mistake and spoke for an entire hour against his client, who was neither alive nor dead sitting behind him.

Type The most important differences between the new Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and the old Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR: The task of fighting crime has been excluded from the tasks of criminal proceedings.

It cannot be said that the legal profession in the provinces in general, and in district towns in particular, is considered a serious matter, that is, an occupation worthy of respect. A lawyer is looked upon as a person “without specific occupations”, as a loiterer, in other words, as a person from whom nothing “worthwhile” can be expected.

Once upon a time there was a boy. His name was Slava Voitenko. The boy became a youth, the youth became a soldier. The soldiers were starved, beaten, doused with water and thrown out into the cold. He endured. He was raped and tortured with electricity. He died. When he died, like the surviving prisoners of Buchenwald, his mouth did not close - it was a skeleton covered in skin. You might have thought that Slava Voitenko ended up in the Gestapo. Or captured by the Taliban. Not at all.

Changes in the political system, economic and social relations, the creation of the rule of law and the process of democratization of society inevitably entail serious judicial changes. This was the case in Russia in the 1860s, when feudal relations were replaced by bourgeois relations, the legal formalization of which required a change in the entire judicial system and the introduction of jury trials in the empire.