We have long planned this issue - about the variety of forms and mechanisms for exiting authoritarian-totalitarian regimes. They gave the working title: “Transition Formula.” We discussed for a long time what stories were needed and looked for authors. Meanwhile, the formula definitely didn’t add up. Moreover, over time, reasonable doubts arose: are there universal patterns that describe the “transition”?

From the stories of the afternoon the Pentecost of 1816-1866, the period of the third. 1848-1866 The period is third. 1848-1866 In his circular, to his diplomatic agents, Franzii Lamartin expresses: “Franziya became a republic; The French Republic, in order to exist, does not need to be recognized. It is established by the great people, who has the right to independent existence.

Construction without a plan [1] My work as a special authorized person began with temporary solutions. At first, I was placed at the hotel for Aleksanderplatz, then the Federal Federal Property Department provided me with a furnished apartment.

In the center of the proposed analysis is the problem of the relationship between the public attitude to the Nazi past and the democratization of the West German political culture. Over the years, the company's post -war company has passed to review the foundations of national identity in the light of the consequences of the civilizational gap caused by the Nazi dictatorship.

Thier and his message on December 7th Human, in the hands of which, according to a completely random stitching circumstances, the fate of the French fell, and who at the same time manages only to repeat the classic phrase: “Neither monarchy, nor the republic,” can play the role of either one or another.

The causes, course and results of regime changes have become the subject of close research of social sciences in general and political science in particular, since the 50s of the last century, are still ongoing [1] . Comparing one mode with another, we analyze the change in structural and functional political outlines and at the same time we can use different models [2] .

Do you think the restructuring has already ended or has not yet ended? If you think that the restructuring has ended, then when, in what years this happened? More than 20 years have passed since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Gaidar reforms. If we turn to the extremely popular analogy with the outcome of Egyptian slavery - more than half the term conducted by the Jewish people in the desert under the leadership of Moses.

In 2010, twenty years after the GDR ceased to exist, an investigative commission was created in Brandenburg to “revise the past, overcoming the consequences of the dictatorship of the Socialist Unified Party of Germany (SEPG) and strengthening the democratic legal state in the land of Brandenburg”.

The adequate classification of the modern Russian regime is the task of special importance, since the features of the regime and the ruling elite inevitably determine the specifics of the subsequent democratic transition. However, in the case of Putin Russia, the solution to this problem for political scientists is especially difficult.

Print Sergey Ryzhenkov The events of the last two years [1] talk about the beginning of a new process of regime transformation in Russia. And although we can only talk about the very first steps in this direction, appeal to theories and comparative research of transformations of political regimes (TPR) acquires a value that goes beyond purely academic studies.

When Russians are asked to evaluate communism as a system of ideas, they strongly speak out in his favor. Moreover, even young people, as we see, see the predominance of the “bright” side in it almost twice as often than “dark”. As for the older generation, there is an advantage of positive assessments over negative ones. But the proposal to equip Russian society in accordance with the ideas of communism is much cooler: 43 % of respondents would like this, they would not want - 38 %.

Print Paloma Agilar The complicity of the judicial authorities in repressions of authoritarian regimes and the justice of the transition period [1] Why did Argentina and Chiles advanced significantly in search of truth and justice, while in Spain the thousands of sentences issued in the political processes of the Frankist regime in 1936-1975 were not abolished or at least revised?

In political science literature, the Russian political regime, as a rule, is designated as “hybrid”, while the concept of the hybrid regime itself is (at least partially) a generation of a certain disappointment of transitologists. Political practice did not confirm the thesis of transit as a linear process of transition from authoritarianism to consolidated democracy.

Print Malcolm Maggeridge Oz introduces the reader to excerpts from the book “Chronicle of ruined time” , belonging to the feather of the English journalist Malcolm Maggeridge , one of the largest in the 20th century. Chronologically, this philosophical autobiography covers the period from the beginning of the last century to the first few years after the end of World War II, but the author often makes “sorties” in later periods of his life.

Michael Thomasello. The origins of human communication / Per. from English. MV Falikman, E. V. Pechenkova, M.V. Sinitsyna, Anna A. Kibrik, A. I. Karpukhina. - M.: Languages ​​of Slavic cultures, 2011. - 328 p. Melchuk I. A. Language: From meaning to the text. - M.: Languages ​​of Slavic cultures, 2012. - 176 p. Panov E. N. Paradox of continuity: Language Rubicon. About the insurmountable abyss between communication in animals and the language of humans.