This number of Oz is primarily devoted to the general issues of the reputation of economic entities or political and public figures, who are already “in sight”, that is, occupying certain hierarchical or media -marked positions. I will try to supplement the picture with a discussion of the political (or civil ) reputation of “ordinary citizens”.

In traditional Japan, there was no genre of autobiography. Of course, the Japanese talked about themselves, made instructions to descendants, wrote letters and diaries, from which we learn about their affairs and feelings, but purposefully to narrate their own life throughout its length did not occur to them. And the point here is not at all in the absence of a person in the East, which, even in the 21st century, some Western (and after them and Japanese) cultural scientists are so fond of.

N. Shchedrin <...> All devoted anxiety in the expectation of the authorities, I involuntarily asked myself: why has never happened to me before? Why have I had no doubt about the eb, and now I am in doubt? Why didn’t I even assume something to break me, and now I don’t have to assume, but I am still waiting for that?

Eisenegger Mark Co-director of the Research Institute for the Public Sphere and Society of the University of Zurich, also teaches at the universities of Lugano and Friborg. Member of the Directorate of the European Center for Reputation Studies. Research interests: corporate communication, research on reputation issues and media transformation. Author of articles and books: Reputation in der Mediengesellschaft - Constitution, Issues Monitoring, Issues Management.

Today it is difficult to imagine this, but two centuries ago, Russian troops, which were part of the international coalition, created by the efforts of the Russian Emperor Alexander I, entered the submitted Paris. The evidence of eyewitnesses of this one of the most important events of the 19th century, which we would like to tell, not focusing on the course of hostilities or diplomatic struggle, but on how ordinary people perceived.

Print Evgenia Cordon Before the presentation, at which I was present and which was supposed to last no more than two hours, the director of the corporation that conducted this event gave the subordinates: “Check that everyone has a password from our Wi-Fi. A modern person cannot without the Internet!

Print Vadim Mikhailin Exposition: two optics of the Homeric epic One of the many differences that exist between the two great Greek poems, which we, by the Greek tradition, call the Homeric tradition, is how clearly we see the outlines of the figures that appear before us on the forefront of the narrative.

Things are incompatible Karen Armstrong. Battle for God: the history of fundamentalism. Per. from English. -M.: Alpina Non-Fikshn, 2013.-502 p. Before us is a translation of one of the books of British Karen Armstrong, which, although it does not belong to academic circles, is currently one of the most famous authors in the world who write about religion.

THE POWER OF REPUTATION Editorial Note This issue of the journal examines reputation mechanisms and some of the specific features of their functioning in the modern world undergoing processes of both the information revolution and globalization.

Today, many cultural figures express their opinion about the events taking place in the country in different ways: they sign collective letters, participate in processions, etc., do you think, cultural figures should or should not publicly express their opinion about the events taking place in the country?

Most of my friends, even those who do not know about China, other than the name of his capital, nevertheless heard that the most terrible thing for the Chinese was to lose face. Indeed, there is no such sphere of public life where this “face” would not be present everywhere: everywhere it is the basis of any communication, communication, interaction. Chinese society is a society of dating and “connections”, directly dependent on the “persons” of their participants.

It is very exciting and, one might say, easy to talk about reputation in the high sense of the word. Reputation as a phenomenon in the light of the theory of social progress, mechanisms of reputation formation in science, sociological models of reputational risks, reputation as one of the regulators of business processes - all this is described well and fully. True, it is better and more complete - outside the borders of our fatherland.

Science and power [1] Battle of reputation The reform of science in Russia, declared since the summer of 2013, requires a clear idea of ​​the situation in the community and profession. But the official who dreams of handing out reputations with his own hand grabs her analytical methods (in this case biblometry) and begins to use them anti -reference in every sense: both incorrectly, and against science as an institution.

If you look at our position with enlarging optics, such a fall in the government’s reputation has not been in history for a long time or never, but the world has not turned over, the country has not exploded. Upon closer examination, the image of a “lost reputation” is scattered into many fragments, each of which is a special image. This scattering has its own logic and a system, which is useful to understand.

Pierre-Marie Shoven * Sociology of reputation ** One definition and five questions The sociology of reputation is the field of research relatively new, extensive and still poorly structured. Specialists in economic sociology, sociology of art, political sociology, sociology of digital communications and the Internet, the sociology of the city, etc.