Why would a dictator, who miraculously extricated himself from one unsuccessful and costly aggression, immediately get involved in the next, even more risky one?
In the “What Happened” podcast we talk with Maxim Samorukov, a researcher at the Carnegie Berlin Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, about the logic of dictators (not only Saddam Hussein, but also Vladimir Putin) who resort to external aggression.
How to support Meduza <a href="https://mdza.io/dOANVOeTWQU" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://mdza.io/dOANVOeTWQU</a>
Text by Maxim Samorukov: <a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/09/achilles-trap-book-review?lang=ru&amp;center=russia-eurasia" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/09/achilles-trap-book-review?lang=ru&amp;center=russia-eurasia</a>
0:00 Why are we talking about Hussein's regime
06:30 Why do dictators fight?
12:11 Dictators’ belief in their invincibility
16:40 Why didn’t anyone hand over Hussein?
22:30 What does Hussein's regime say about Putinism?
37:54 Farewell