To oppose the war, you need to come to the elections at noon and ruin the ballot. Instructions from Dmitry Oreshkin A billboard in Moscow call to vote for Putin in the elections, January 22, 2024. Photo: Maxim Shipenkov / EPA-EFE March 17 - Birthday of the Killer of the Russian Electoral System V.E. Churov. The adept of corporate occultism V.V.

If Russia starts a political scandal over the unification of the coastal defenses of Estonia and Finland, then this is absolutely futile Photo: pixabay Recently, Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur said that Estonia and Finland have agreed to combine their coastal defenses after Finland becomes a NATO member. And consequently, the Baltic will become “NATO’s internal sea.” Finland's entry into NATO and the formation of an “inland sea” is rather a philosophical question.

As a non-people people transformed into a rocket carrier, built on the model of Chechnya Kadyrov Photo: Isolda Rubbin / especially for “Novaya Gazeta. Europe" It is generally accepted that the futility of attempts to understand Russia is associated with the unique complexity of the object. The explanation is flattering, but hardly exhaustive. Perhaps the case is the device of the mind. During the default, it is undertaken under European discourse and terminology.

Macron brought Vladimir Putin a life preserver Photo: kremlin.ru The West accepted Putin’s challenge in the field of information warfare and correctly understood it as a bluff – artificial tension on the border with Ukraine. And then Mr. Macron, who understands the situation well, arrives and fills the vacuum created by the German position. Macron brought some ideas that he will discuss with Ukraine, Germany, Britain and the United States.

Is it true that online voting played into the hands of power not only in Moscow? Analysis of Dmitry Oreshkin and Alexander Condia Electronic voting defenders in Moscow explain its scandalous results (exclusive support of candidates from the Sobyanin list in all 15 districts) by the fact that the Communists, they say, campaigned against the “electronics”, and therefore the online vote remained at the regeneration of power.

Photo: Mikhail Gorbachev // photo: Global Look Press Political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin discusses why the popular belief about the desire of Soviet people to preserve the USSR is a myth. 30 years ago a referendum was held on the fate of the USSR, and this week only the lazy did not write that 76% of the Soviet people spoke in favor of the Union, and Gorbachev destroyed it! Ah, my dears. Firstly, not the entire Soviet people, but those who came to the polling stations.

Mainstream. The famous political scientist S. A. Markov writes on Echo of Moscow: “On March 17, 1991, there was a referendum on the preservation of the USSR. 80% of the population took part in it, 76% of the population voted to preserve the Union. Therefore, the collapse of the Union has become the greatest geopolitical tragedy. And a huge crime against democracy. ” Dmitry Oreshkin Lord, how tired!

Political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin says that the security bloc is becoming the only reliable support for the Russian president. Vladimir Putin, by one decree, immediately awarded 62 general ranks to security forces. Before this, high-ranking officials were more often fired. Is the president looking for support from those who have power in their hands? Positive incentives that could ensure not even an increase in Putin’s support, but at least its preservation, have been exhausted.

Photo: Vladimir Putin // photo: Global Look Press Political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin says that the security bloc is becoming the only reliable support for the Russian president. Vladimir Putin, by one decree, immediately awarded 62 general ranks to security forces. Before this, high-ranking officials were more often fired. Is the president looking for support from those who have power in their hands?

Photo: Sergei Lavrov can only pretend to be victorious // photo: Global Look Press Political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin talks about how to understand the words of the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry about his readiness to sever relations with the EU. Sergei Lavrov announced his readiness to sever relations with the EU. He spoke his harsh words shortly after publicly reprimanding Josep Borrell , the EU's foreign policy coordinator.

Political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin talks about how to understand the words of the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry about his readiness to sever relations with the EU. Sergei Lavrov announced his readiness to sever relations with the EU. He spoke his harsh words shortly after publicly reprimanding Josep Borrell , the EU's foreign policy coordinator.

How successfully he chose time! Miraculously, the surviving opponent on the bunks - apparently for more than two years. And how, at such a happy moment, he can’t debunk him, not to open the eyes of the lost intelligentsia for populism, nationalism, games with the Kremlin and other terrible qualities of the recluse?! Another, maybe in such an ambiguous situation, would have been silent - but only not impeccable moral tuning for the domestic democracy G. A. Yavlinsky.

We drove, rode, and finally arrived. The words that “foreign agents” repeated for twenty years suddenly turned into gross material reality for everyone. No, of course, there were still those who, having lifted the windows and closing their eyes, hope to sit out in front of the box, where Russia rises from the knees. But I'm afraid it will not work.