In society

Parshev and the Central Committee. Part 1

July 30, 2009 Dmitry Oreshkin

Colleagues blame: what, they say, stuck to Parshev? No more important things?

Maybe there is, but it seems to me acutely necessary to understand the universe in which such people live and think. There are surprisingly many of them, and they seriously consider themselves patriots. On exclusive rights. What, in my opinion, humiliate Russia and lead to another misfortune.

Their world is rooted in Soviet mythology. Since it is false, they are also forced to lie all the time. Such a strange moral duty: with the help of a new lies to reanimate the old. Based on the old, generate new ones. Bringing the sovereign power to ultrasound. Previously, they rang about a bright communist future, now about a bright Stalinist past. In principle, the smartest of them is still forward or backward. It is possible on the spot. The main thing is to get stronger on the neck of the taxpayer, to hang the legs and indicate the path beyond the horizon. And there the grass is not to grow.

What are they seeing there behind the horizon? Here A.P. Parshev in his simplicity and reveals the cards. Along with A.G. Dugin, A.A. Prokhanov, tiredin Ben Lenin and other guides. As it turns out, they see the leader on their right hand (Lenin and the Marx-Engels quietly excommunicated around the corner), and on the left-enemies and pests. Which prevent him from building an eternal engine and happy humanity. Well, or individual Russia.

Such is their historical reality. Stalin is great because he constantly defeated enemies; Enemies, in turn, are insidious and numerous so that the process can go continuously. A sort of two -stroke eternal engine.

In addition, you can’t explain without enemies why he does not want to work in any way.

Bank values

Reality philosophers call conscious reality . Discourse is real. It is more interesting and useful to investigate not the essence of the Soviet dogmas (well, what is the essence in the eternal engine), but the process of their invention. Optics through which the authors are aware of the world.

If the country lives in a sealed canning bank - like a Cuba, Venezuela, Iran or North Korea today - then its political reality for the time being avoids verification of reality . The world, as he knows how, develops, and the tin flies to herself on the sidelines from the consciousness of historical exclusivity. Slowly rusts. Reality for her is hostile simply because it exists and offers an alternative.

Why, for example, Canada, Japan or the USA cost without traitors and pests as a factor in political life? Perhaps because their reality is not erased by the idea of ​​an eternal engine, and they modestly obey the natural laws of being. On the other hand, why did the USSR, like no other country, survived four waves of emigration on its victorious path, four waves of state terror, three hunger, two wars, all overcame it and fell apart from the threshold?

Spinning mythology teaches what should be the other way around. But sooner or later, reality seeps through the holes and makes you think: either something is wrong with our jar, or with the outside world. “Patriotic” (in particular, Parshevsky) value concept (Central Committee) immediately clutches for the second explanation. Of course, our Stalin is right, but reality is wrong. The USSR disappeared by a criminal oversight. We blinked, and the representatives of the representatives ruined. They threw cognitive dissonance into a healthy folk thick. They laid out from the inside ... And the climate also helped them!

This means reality. So in the DPRK there were slanderous people who whisper retold that in America they give out not 300 grams of rice in America, but as much as 800!

To combine the spiritual choice with life, the patriotic Central Committee of the Bolshevik Central Committee chopped reality under its growth, exhausting the wrong phenomena and drawing the right in return. It doesn’t matter. Dugin’s “ideocracy”, “Fifth Empire” by Prokhanov, “Slavic Knight Lukashenko”, “Climate as a political economy” - all these structures fall apart when meeting reality faster than dialectical materialism. They noticed how their rhetoric was crushed? Those who are simpler, like M. Shevchenko, stuttering, are already carrying a complete blizzard. Like, it seems that Lukashenko fulfilled and performs the secret task of the United States to violate communications between Russia and Western Europe ... What to do: what are the brains, such is reality. In it, if the Putin policy sat in a puddle, then certainly because of a multi-way American special operation. The idea that this is a normal position for her is not fit into the Shevchenkovsky discourse.

Who is more smart, like Prokhanov, that remains bitter to pierce. And what to do if the light is in the window, the flesh from the flesh, the human man A.G. Lukashenko, who does not know a single extra language that has not read a single extra book - is also a traitor? The union state is laundry under the pathos sign. The outposts of the bulky empire in Transnistria and South Ossetia are black holes of corruption. "Bulava", Padla, does not fly. The crocodile is not caught, GLONASS is not growing. The FSB, of course, is following the trail of saboteurs, but somehow it is not excited ...

After his Aria, you always want to get up and tell the offenders: “Gentlemen! Immediately return to Comrade Prokhanov an taken a penny! Let a person buy a “Lego” and finally build his empire! ”

The value concept rot. This is natural, because it has nothing to do with reality. "Slavic Brotherhood"? But what about the entertained section of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, with the military section between the Serbs and Slovenes, Serbs and Croats, Serbs and Bosnyaks? With the departure of Montenegro? With Poland? Enemies, enemies around ... "Orthodox collegiality"? But what about co -religious Bulgaria and Greece in NATO, Romania in the European Union, Ukraine, Belarus, a war with Georgia? Traitors, traitors around ... "Does the climate bother us"? But what about Canada, Alaska, Finland? In the climatic reality of Parshev, Finland has long been obliged to bend from the cold (he promised!) - but in fact, she supplies not only our great homeland with mobile phones, but all other incorrectly arranged world.

I don’t want to talk about the fairy tale of “proletarian solidarity”. Where this very proletariat is preserved, except for the imagination of G.A. Zyuganova and his Old Believers? The real world is more complicated and interesting. But they have no need. They have their own universe.

Spit, and pass by. But it is impossible: a living Russia is suffocating under the decaying Central Committee. If you want, you don’t want to, you have to rake it. Otherwise, Pedikulosis, dysentery, Dr. Onishchenko and so on again.

Citizens, while there is still time, read Parshev. Give the immunity.

What are you, infection ...

The poet spreads easily, the benefit of the patronizing smile of the authorities. It is clear that in the Universe of Zyuganov, Prokhanov or Dugin (and now Putin), openness is destructive, and isolationism is a natural and only state of the homeland. The Central Committee needs to urgently plug up all holes in the sieve. Otherwise, the eternal engine will not start.

Explaining this axiom, A.P. Parshev for reliability refers to personal experience: “In the late 80s, I heard just one phrase, which, perhaps, led to the coup of my ideas about the world. Then I studied English, and once I came across some public speech by M. Thatcher in foreign policy in the sound recording ... So, speaking of the prospects of the USSR, it stated about the following, without explaining this in any way: “In the USSR, 15 million people are economically justified.” I once again scrolled the record, maybe at least Fifty (Fifty ”?) There is no, like“ fiftyin ”-“ fifteen ”, I didn’t rush” (p. 5 of the books of A.P. Parshev “Why Russia is not America”, M., “Crimean Most-9d”, 2001))

Suppose, about the "revolution of representations" - this is more for the nozzle. As if before he did not distinguish between the enemy through his optics. But God is with him. It is more important that after a few pages of a deep analysis, the author concludes that the number of Russians and the West is enough to ensure uninterrupted export of energy and piercing forest. The rest, therefore, can be expenditure. That's what, it turns out, had in mind the iron lady.

The story does not end there. On May 14, 2006, at the Echo of Moscow, in the program “Full Albats”, the State Duma deputy from United Russia Vladimir Medinsky shared with the audience surprisingly similar observations:

“At one time, M. Thatcher, evil languages ​​attributed a terrible phrase that ... from the point of view of the world economy, it is optimal for the Soviet Union to have a population of 15 million people ... I then thought that this was a translated mistake, and climbed into the source, thinking that it was about 150. No, about 15 - well, to protect the pipe is more than enough.”

Purely humanly interesting, in which source did Medinsky climbed? If the matter is in the “Translation Error”, the source was obviously in English. But what's the point of checking how many millions were “attributed to evil languages” there?

No, it seems that the inquisitive deputy still made his way to a file with Aunt Maggie's speeches. And, like A.P. Parshev, horrified: yes, 15 million !! In any case, it is from this stove that he begins to debunk the ideas of the Atlantists to turn Russia into an energy empire. Or not, no, sorry - in the raw material appendage ... depends on the optics.

Excellent, but then what is the saying about malicious attributors then? So he would say with Parshevskaya directness: “Here M. Thatcher believes that for servicing the pipe, from the point of view of the world economy, it is enough to leave 15 million Russians. I myself once heard somewhere some of her approximately the following performance. Well, when still studied English ... "

Alas, it does not go. The bank rusted, for direct lies they can overdo it. Visa will be deprived of ... to the uncontrolled Parshev, let's say, no difference, but the intelligent person is impossible V. Medinsky. Is it so bizarre to the deputy’s wriggling?

Or maybe everything is easier. Maybe Mr. Medinsky just stared the Parshevskaya bike, along with a flirty disbelief in a terrible figure, and pulled on his intelligent image. What is there - we count with glory, because we are our own people. Let us a common monument will be the patriotism built in battles.

Either this trivial plagiarism (the “primary source” is actually A.P. Parshev), or both of our patriots were taught to suck facts from the same finger in the same incubator. In any case, it would be interesting to look at the link.

In principle, nothing new. Quite Soviet technology. At first, a proletarian leaflet abroad prints a certain bullshit, then it is quoted by a bored progressive journalist in a respectable newspaper, and then our heavy artillery thumps through domestic brains: "According to the messages of the bourgeois press ..."

As a result, the bike is about 15 million Russians, who, from the point of view of the West, are enough to serve the pipe, lives independent sexual life, successfully multiplies and populates the virgin expanses of patriotic thought. Along with the “5 million street children”, “20 million illegal immigrants” and other dental numbers that propagate their universe like three elephants and turtles.

The method is good not only for exposing an external enemy, but also for injuring internal positive. After all, how cool in due time we had given small -britants! Churchill himself stood in a string in front of the Great Stalin. Even at a special meeting of the parliament, he was forced to admit through his teeth that he "accepted Russia with Sohu, but left with an atomic bomb." Learn, young men!

Without going into the meaningful part (although there is something to say about Soh and about the bomb), I will limit myself to dry statements: again lies.

The unbending Nina Andreeva (“ I can’t make the principles ”), quoting this phrase “the faithful guard of the British Empire”, eagerly believes that she scheduled the Philistines of the Stalinist jaw. But in fact, a personal example was illustrated by the device of a soviet enema for the head. Her poor, from childhood, was fed by a secondary ideological product. She is proud of this and demands that the new generations grow on a similar diet.

In fact, Churchill never said this anywhere. Moreover, in parliament. The formula belongs to Marxist Deutser, who in Soviet historiography is a sticked as a Trotskyist. That, again, only a propaganda stamp. But what a disappointment! It is one thing when a seasoned enemy bows his head before the greatness of the leader, and something else is somewhat unfinished by Trotskyist with a dubious surname. And if it’s completely clean, then with the name Isaac.

The technology is the same: to steal the idea, replace a sign with a name, shake it properly and merge into broad masses. The source is then neutralized. They are convinced that the whole world acts so that no one dares to object to them. So it was - until life was compacted to the bank.

But life is tending to get out. And the picture comes out different. The value concept, generously armed comrade. Andreev with Zhevana with newspaper paper, threw it, along with other “real communists”, to the defense of the shrines. Meanwhile, he himself went to eat a ball of cognac, divide power and property. There is a hint of justice in this. Maybe at least for a split second she, having felt herself when meeting with a stupor from the lane, experienced what hundreds of thousands of deceived militias survived before the death of the 41st in the fall of the 41st. When they, after many years of cheers-patriotic pumping, threw them into the mud under fascist tanks with one rifle for three.

Where is industrialization? Where are the valiant commanders? Where are the rivers and cast iron? Where is the genius of the leader, the war with little blood, a powerful blow, in a foreign territory?

Yes, in the same place, where Churchill, standing hands at the seams in front of Stalin. All this is chewed paper. The special abomination is that the regiments and divisions, which actually paid for the Stalin-Voroshilovsky lies, are silent, having gained lands in the mouth. And those from the special department who stood in the warm short fur coats with machine guns behind them, survived, gave abundant corporate offspring and now they safely create their version of the victorious historical reality . They share the experienced with youth: if not for Stalin, they would definitely not have won the war ...

If it weren’t for Stalin, in the name of his value concept, which forbade the German communists to go to the election union with the Social Democrats, Hitler would not have received power. There would be no war. Of course, the story of the pre-war battle of the Stalinist Comintern with the German Social Democracy is neatly lured out of a picture of patriotic reality.

So let's go without "if." There is an objective reality of the fact, and there is a subjective reality of interpretation. Interpret as you like, but do not hide the facts and do not grind. Flies, on the advice of A.P. Parsheva, separately, compote separately. V.V. Putin prefers to talk about cutlets, but this is not the point. Tested by time, a good joke. Also from the general incubator?

The process of growing falsifications about Churchill, followed by its processing into patriotic compound feed, has already been disassembled in detail, so I send the curious directly to the source .

In the same way, the Communists lied about the five -year plan in three years, about the victorious growth of collective farm production, about an unprecedented leap in industrialization. The Bolshevik lie is so cynical and total that a normal person cannot psychologically doubt. It’s also impossible ... so that so much and so shameless ...

Can. This is the horror. For whatever it is as it should, either pathos lies or bloody silence pops up everywhere. A brilliant example of the post -Soviet Stalinist lamentation is given by Viktor Suvorov. Starting with a captivating truth that Stalin dreamed of world military domination (o, sensation!), The author, in accordance with the technology, the little clove humiliates the truth to the soviet nonsense, that, de, the leader had ahead, brilliantly prepared plans for striking in Germany at the very beginning of July 41st . It is clear why it humiliates: to show that in the main Stalin was right. That the USSR was strong and powerful. Even with excess. So much so that it was too bold and too close to the border led its tank armades, with one blow with one blow to break the ridge to the fascist beast. Well, I miscalculated slightly - with whom it does not happen ...

And so everything was right. “Our army and the entire state worked with the accuracy of the clock mechanism ...” (“The Last Republic”, M., AST, 1998, p. 304). “The Red Army is the only army of the world that has heavy tanks in service. In this area, the Soviet Union has not just a primacy, but undivided dominance: all other states of the world have bold ideas and beautiful drawings at best ... ”(ibid., P. 345). And in general, only vile communists (whom Comrade Suvorov is at ease from Stalin) then “... ordered to write a story so that decisive superiority (more precisely - complete Soviet domination) in the field of heavy tank building to hide ...” (p. 346). The author is equally harsh in relation to Soviet statistics, which, after the war, wrote off 22,000 light Soviet tanks into the mismatch. To humiliate a bright image. But actually, in the sense of tanks, we had a seven-time advantage over the Germans before the war ... As for Germany, it was “not preparing for the war” (p. 356). And moved to the USSR exclusively from fear and despair to Stalin's superior power ...

All this Beliberd is divided into one simple and immutable fact of reality. Tanks do not tend to dissolve without a trace in the air. Если бы десятки тысяч наших броневых единиц оказались за линией фронта, немцы, не будь дураки, быстро вернули бы их в боевое состояние и развернули против России. Даже если допустить, что всех их перед беспорядочным отступлением успели взорвать (что возможно только в патриотическом воображении), они были бы вывезены и использованы в виде металлолома. Где в германских архивах документы на сей счет? Документы есть – в пошловатом стиле В. Суворова позволим напомнить читателю, что уж в неаккуратности эту нацию никак не заподозришь. Однако никаких «тысяч» там и близко не наблюдается.

Суворов не зря проговаривается насчет продажного характера коммунистической статистики. Это как раз чистая правда. Только он «патриотически» пытается развернуть данную неприглядную особенность в пользу Сталина. Ибо искренне мерит читателя по себе. То есть держит за идиота. Который, исходя из ценностей державного катехизиса, верит, будто после Сталина коммунистические игры со статистикой были возможны, а при нем – ни-ни. Ну невозможно же!! Ведь при Сталине же у нас настоящий порядок был же, правда же?! Же?!

На самом деле броневая мощь СССР была таким же естественным плодом официальной туфты, что и сталинская перепись населения. Военные заводы приписывали цифры, победно отчитываясь перед наркомом Ворошиловым, а тот, в свою очередь, передавал байки т. Сталину. Армады шествовали по страницам отчетности, набирая силу и мощь, подобно подпоручику Киже, и никто, в тотальной обстановке ужаса и террора, не смел раскрыть рта, чтобы сказать простую правду. Потому что правда тогда именовалась клеветой на достижения советского строя, а по доброй воле идти в гости к Берии никому не хотелось.

Сегодня В. Суворов, подобно А. Паршеву, старательно возрождает былую туфту под привлекательным для «демократической общественности» антикоммунистическим соусом, обороняя свою лубянскую вселенную от столкновений с действительностью. Эти два литератора вообще пишут на удивление схоже. Коммунистами (благо те давно скисли) жертвуют легко, а вот Сталина аккуратно отделяют и берегут как нерушимую опору корпоративного мифа. Лично мне кажется, что за их прозрениями стоит одна и та же творческая группа. Вплоть до одинаково паскудного литературного стиля. Но это отдельная тема; бог даст, со временем разберемся.

To be continued

Photo by RIA Novosti