Translated material
The leaders of the ugliness
The participants of the next “round table” on the reform of the housing and communal services came to an unoriginal conclusion: the reform is even fresh, but still raw
The participants of the next “round table” on the reform of the housing and communal services came to an unoriginal conclusion: the reform is even fresh, but still raw
On May 28, in Pskov, in the framework of the program “Network of Housing Enlightenment Schools”, a round table was held on the topic “Housing and Utilities Reform for Pskov journalists: inconvenient questions, pressing answers”.
| | | --- | | 
Among the experts were the only public (in the sense of well -known all) in the field of private housing business the head - Director of the Management Company LLC Cozy Houses, deputy of the regional assembly Igor Smirnov, Pioneer of creating partnerships of housing owners in Pskov, and now the head of another Pskov management company Zhilservice, Andrei Tarasov, Deputy Head of the Department of the General Customer of the City of Pskov. Anatoly Krasnenkov, Chairman of the Regional Council of Trade Unions Leonid Tabakov, representatives of MP UMR No. 7, brought to the meeting by one of the public participants in the project - the head of the Chernobyl Soyuz POOO and the legal adviser of UMR No. 7 in one person Mikhail Koshurnikov. In addition, there were already two employees of the Committee on Information and Analytical Work of the Pskov Administration: Valery Vorobyov and Vladimir Rybakov.
The organizers of the event did not regret the time for the exact following the plan of the "round table". So far, the journalists have not asked for addiction: why your publication is interested in the topic of housing and communal services, how actively you use sources from the executive, legislative and judicial authorities of the Pskov region in the coverage of reform issues, what difficulties arise when working with these sources, what information on the reform of the housing and communal services you are not enough - the “round table” has not moved to an active stage. Namely, it turned out to be the most interesting - the discussion of people who generally agree with each other, but in private's private ones, are significantly diverging.
Although “in general” with the newborn sharks of the communal business, any Pskov pensioner could have agreed. For “sharks” and hired municipalities did not spare the epithets to characterize the reform: raw, unprepared, dumb, bard. In the absence of accurately formulated issues discussed (it is painfully wide and deep, up to drowning, you can interpret the “reform of the housing and communal services”) experts freely moved from specific gaps in housing legislation to again global criticism of the housing code.
| | | --- | | 
The deadlines for concluding contracts for the provision of services - from January to January - also cause serious concerns among the “communal” businessman. And if energy supplying organizations that the terms of the contract can consider the month, while the court and the case of the “gate” are blocked? "Do not block!" - Smirnov’s colleague and municipal colleagues opposed him in chorus, appealing, moreover, federal legislation (in any case, to by -laws). But in general, oddly enough, they agreed with Mr. Tarasov.
“The reform of the housing and communal services now is not the reform of the housing and communal services itself, but the reform of the management system named after It is at present, in this country, it is a disgrace. And if it cannot be prevented if it took place, I decided that he should “head” him so that the society suffered the smallest losses, ”Mr. Smirnov admitted in his own heroism, explaining why he decided to participate in such a disadvantageous business (“ There is no money in the communal economy, there was no Igor Evgenievich in the shillies). But the main hopes for the prevention of final disgrace were assigned to the municipality. “The municipality has the right to hold competitions on the choice of management companies and must implement it. Only the municipality can clearly register the rights and obligations in long -term (for three years) contracts with management companies, ”Igor Smirnov warmly convinced all convinced.
On a general nervous background (on a “round table” more than once in the context of the reform, Igor Evgenievich poured oil into the fire of the reform, nevertheless solidarized with Mr. Tarasov: “Let's prepare competitions! We are offered to spend them in the heating season, moreover, during the period of two election campaigns. But the deadline should be September 1 of this year! They promised me that this issue will be considered at the next session of the meeting. I watched the agenda - so far it is not. But if the issue of the timing of the competitions is not resolved in June, the reform will be disrupted. ”
During the discussion, representatives of the seventh administration of the microdistrict mildly noticed that not a single UMR could participate in the competition: there is no authorized capital, there is no means to participate in the competition (1 lot involves a competitive contribution of at least 500 thousand rubles, and the lot is 100 thousand square meters, when business anniversary begins in the service area, at least 700 thousand sq. M.). "And who then can?" - The journalists who still clearly realized that no private management company will be embarrassed for the lion's share of the Pskov housing stock (Khrushchobs) - except that “nee” by the municipal enterprise. Mr. Krasnenkov explained that the MP will no longer be. They will be transformed into joint-stock companies with 100 percent municipal participation, directors will have contracts with municipality ... they did not have time to formulate uncomfortable questions (mainly about money), what to talk about relevant answers, when I wanted to talk about the delimitation of land and about the land surveying process and the possible massive “imprisoning” of housing. About the reform of the housing and communal services, in general.
The preliminary result of the discussion turned out to be predictable: the chef should bring a raw product to readiness. That is, federal legislators and executors (government). And then no courts will help: something, maybe they will “set up”, but they will not contact something, indicating that the legislation is not settled in this matter.
But they also mentioned the finally manifested federal attention at the “round table”: on June 4, in Moscow, chaired by the Minister of Regional Development of Russia Vladimir Yakovlev, the first All-Russian meeting “Management of apartment buildings: the management method-HOA/ZhSK” will be held. In less than two and a half years, as such a form of management of the housing stock as the HOA, they remembered at the federal level, from where the whole reform came out. At the meeting, a presentation of the All -Russian Association of HOA/ZhSK should be held. There is a little hope that it will help those who risk “organizing and leading” reformal disgrace at the local level. Because, in principle, the housing and communal services have no other level.
Elena Shiryaeva.