Translated material
Painful seal
Disassembleing another daddy, full of appeals of citizens who are dissatisfied with the construction under the windows of his home of another house, involuntarily think that we all seem to misunderstand the meaning of the most difficult national project “Available and Comfortable Housing”.
| | | --- | | 
Comfort for today's times can apply to the limits of a single apartment, this is not forbidden. But so that to the limits of all living space around the whole house? Yes, be a god to God, what time do you live at?
In Pskov, the only city of the region where housing construction is actively conducted, there is not enough land, all engineering infrastructure costs breathtaking funds, people need apartments, not courtyards! Look, and the buyer who invested frantic money in the purchase of an apartment is insanely happy that he had time - it will be more expensive tomorrow. He managed to purchase a roof over his head, and what is being done around this roof-he will then figure it out somehow. And, having figured out, he will somehow transfer unpleasant discoveries: there is nowhere to put the car, you won’t let the children into the courtyard for the practical absence of one, there is a platform where the carpets can be cleaned-no longer-we will manage the vacuum cleaner. The main thing is the roof, walls, windows, doors now have their own!
Sometimes future happy owners of new property are not aware that those who have been living next to the built house have been conducting an irreconcilable struggle for a dozen (or even more than a dozen) years. They do not lead out of harmfulness, not out of a vile feeling “you, come in!”, Not because of the habit of fighting all kinds of innovation, a retaining, a new building. And from the most urgent necessity: they, as in the old "good" post-revolutionary times, compacted.
Of course, I did not move to them, in their two -room improved layout, an apartment from the basement is a worker's family with three children. Just in their small courtyard, compiled by three five -story buildings, not asking their consent, they stuck, or rather, stick another one - exactly in the middle of the fact that before they were a familiar recreation area, and just a place of safe stay on the street. And having plenty of pleasing to the uprooting of their planted trees and bushes, mourning the playground, which had not been a fountain before, but now a couple of swing, sandbox, and hill are completely abandoned next to the fence, cleverly dodging trucks with building materials, people go to the newspaper’s editors: “What do you think, is that all right?” And for reliability, they still go to court. They are so naive, these people.
At the end of December 2006, the lawsuit of citizens of Lyubov Stephanovna Zinkovskaya, Vera Anatolyevna Kazan and Svetlana Antonovna Radonova “On challenging the decisions of the administration of the city of Pskov on the preliminary coordination of the construction site of a new house and the provision of a land plot for construction” was examined in the Pskov City Court.
In 2005, by order of the City Hall of CJSC Construction Firm "DSK", a land plot was provided for a lease for a period of three years and an area of 2 thousand 771 square meters. meter, for the construction of a 74-apartment five-story building. Her future address - st. Labor, 16-a. It is believed that this was done quite publicly: in the newspaper Panorama 7 days, most of which draws up a television program, an announcement was published on the provision of land plots. Among other positions, there was a plot on the street. Labor, 16-a.
Probably, the “yard users” themselves are to blame: this was not carefully studied, it turns out, it turns out, an almost official publication of the city administration. But in full, the information that their yard was “allocated” reached citizens, in fact, through the window: they saw that their “regular plantings of green spaces” were cut down and the “preserved elements of the improvement of children's play and economic sites that have been preserved in some places” (we quote literally a working project for the construction of a residential building). As it later became clear (in court), of course, they will be restored as soon as the construction ends and improvement begins. Lost green spaces are estimated by the developer in the amount of 161 thousand 231 rubles.
Then the residents with some surprise learned that at their general meeting against the construction of categorical objections was allegedly not sounded, the meeting protocol was conducted according to all the rules, and it was signed by representatives of the public in the amount of two people. The “signed” representatives of this fact were also very surprised. However, when in court the fighting residents asked to call the “signatures” for clarification, their request was not satisfied. The representative of the DSK objected: what, they say, to call, everyone was informed about the meeting, all issues were discussed. The court considered such explanations exhaustive.
In general, for every objection or question of the tenants, judging by the protocol of the court session, quite “exhausting” answers: the plaintiffs to the defendants: “You can’t!”, And the defendants to the plaintiffs: “Lyzya!” Sounded. They are told that the norms of playgrounds and parking are significantly reduced, and they answer that they are reduced, but within normal limits. They are told that sunlight will not be enough for residents of existing houses, and they are responsible for the lips of the representative of the Office of the Main State Examination of Russia in the Pskov Region Mr. Vladimir Bessonov, that the new house, indeed, will influence the house No. 16 on the street. Labor and "the sun will be slightly smaller, but within normal limits." Microbes in the apartment should be destroyed by solar radiation, this process, or rather, the sanitary requirement is called insolation. The norm of insolation is 2 hours 30 minutes. So, in house number 16 on the street. The labor of the Sun will be in the "limits of normal."
Or here is another “limit of the norm”: the lease agreement was signed by the mayor with the DSC on October 20, 2005, and registered on December 8, while the administration has a non -compliance with the monthly registration period is indicated as the basis for the order to lose strength.
But further - more, and literally: on October 27, 2006, almost a year later, an additional agreement was signed, according to which the size of the allocated site increased to 5 thousand 811 square meters. meters! And at the time of the trial (in any case, December 20, 2006) he was not registered with the FRS! But the DSK again answered: “Lazi!”, That is, the representative of the defendant said that the documents for registration were submitted. And the court decided that this, in general, is within normal limits. Some unlimited norms ...
This increase in the volume of the allocated section by “additional agreement” seems especially entertaining. We have fertile land in Pskov, do not see that there is a non -black earth: from the moment the site is obtained and the construction permit until the end of the construction, whatever you want can grow - both the boundaries of the site itself and the number of storeys of the house. But you never know the possibilities to “expand and deepen” ...
In the cassation appeal in the regional court (it seems that the reader had already guessed that the city court of the plaintiffs to challenge the actions of the city administration by choosing and providing a land plot was left without satisfaction) residents in defense of their interests indicated a sufficient number of grounds on which they consider the decision made by the city court illegal. Firstly, of course, they pointed out the absence of a lawsuit of a land plot with an area of 5 thousand 811 square meters at the time of appeal to the court. meters. Secondly, they drew attention to the fact that construction work in February 2006 was started in the absence of documents allowing construction.
Thirdly, citizens living nearby from the “development spot” are not only worried about themselves when they claim that the level of alleged improvement does not meet the norms. When they build a house on the street. Labor, 16-A, the number of people living in it, as well as in houses No. 14 and 18 on the street. Labor, will be 616 people. The landscaping area should in this case be 4 thousand 864 square meters. meters - with a total building area of 2 thousand 771 square meters. meter, not 5 thousand 811 square meters. meters. But it (landscaping) is reduced! With reference to the fact that, by reducing the area of improvement, green spaces will be preserved.
It also turns out to be very curious with parking lots: a 74 -apartment building is being built, the project provides for the installation of a site for 10 cars, “it is also possible to use existing transport sites near residential buildings No. 14 and No. 18” - residents are very interested in where are the sites, the possibility of using which is provided?
There are fears that the materials in the case of this “painful seal” will soon be voluminous. For example, during the trial, the issue of ruining the sports ground for house No. 14 on the street was practically not affected. Labor - from the street. Facial. They laid a bypass road for the construction of a house on the street. Labor, 16-a. As a result, according to the residents, destroyed a football field with a gate, as well as metal frames for playing basketball. And they said that it was. And if the kids want to play-let them go to the sports ground to the 12th school. There is not far, across the road. Fortunately, there is a traffic light. But people do not want to put up with this!
Perhaps the reader will ask - at what stage is the construction? In my opinion - in hopeless. The first floor of the house 16-A has long been looking at the residual phenomena of the playground “transferred” for the fence ... The residents themselves note that after they went to court, working in the construction of the boat, not only on workers, but also on weekends. Because there is confidence: with what violations, “eliminated” retroactively, work would not be carried out, no one will decide to break the built.
Yes, life threw up many examples when tenants, frightened by a noisy construction neighborhood, lay down for excavators, categorically stating that they did not need any new houses with improvement and improvement of service. In the end, many were satisfied: the territory was landscaped, shops appeared a stone's throw from the houses, it became more convenient to live. On the street. Labor is another case. The miracle will not happen there - the walls will not be parted, and the space, which was deprived of both those who already live there and those who intend to live, simply disappears. How the tradition of walking with children disappears in the yard: they are going seriously for a walk-in some park as a campaign. And not because it is unsafe, but simply to play and walk next to the house, it seems that there is nothing to breathe even.
However, again we are about luxury when you just need housing. There was no time in Russia so that it was not needed. And having gathered his strength, they are feverishly built, in edification to the descendants - as it is not necessary.
And the next daddy with another address is accumulating on the table, but with the same with the optimistic beginning: "All the tenants categorically against this construction, no one asked us, we were deprived of the yard." It will also have the next answers about the complex improvement, about the reduction of improvement “within the norm”, about compliance with norms and rules, etc. On the body of the city, painful seals arise one after another.
Elena Shiryaeva.