In society

Parshev and the Central Committee. Part 2

August 3, 2009 Dmitry Oreshkin

A little truth

Khrushchev speaks of a meeting of the Stalin's fairy tale with unsightly practice in a painfully and kosolo-language.

“Stalin ... incorrectly assessed the combat effectiveness of our army, being impressed by films, in which parades and military maneuvers showed. Stalin has long seen almost nothing alive. He did not go anywhere from Moscow. He left the Kremlin only to the country and in Sochi, and nowhere else. He received relevant information only through Voroshilov. He, of course, reported, as he himself understood, and he also overestimated the Red Army. He believed that she was at a high level and could easily reflect the Nazi invasion ... How could it be then think that the situation is different? So I take myself. I was a member of the Politburo, rotated in the circle of Stalin, the government. How could I think that literally in the early days of the war there would not even be enough rifles and machine guns? This is elementary. Even the king, who was preparing for the war with Germany, had large stocks of rifles: he did not have enough rifles in 1915 or 1916, and we did not have enough rifles and machine guns on the second day of the war ... I was amazed. How so, no one knew? I don’t know if Stalin knew about this before the war. Probably did not know either. But Voroshilov could not know ... but it turned out that he did not know. This is a crime! People who are responsible for this, from them like a goose of water. Smile in front of cameras and in front of film equipment ... If Stalin knew it! " (N.S. Khrushchev, Memoirs, vol. 1, M., Nick "Moscow News", 1999, pp. 276, 277).

Exactly: how to water water. And “could you think then”?! When the victorious marches are from each iron day and night. On Earth, in heaven and at sea ... from the taiga to the British seas ... Tell me, now “you can think”? No, now you can’t think all the more. It’s the same as applying a blow to the back of the homeland. At least in her Parshevsk-Suvorov version.

Do you want more? At the beginning of the war, Khrushchev leads Ukraine. Not the last knitting needle in the wheel. Sees: around trouble. What to do is incomprehensible. “I called to Moscow. The only person with whom I could talk then was Malenkov. I call him. “Tell us where to get rifles? Workers demand rifles and want to go into the ranks of the Red Army, fight against the German troops. ” He replies: “I can't tell you anything. Here is such chaos that nothing can be made out. I can only tell you that rifles that were in Moscow at Oswaviham (and these are rifles with drilled chamber, spoiled), we ordered to redo it, ordered to close up holes, and all these rifles sent to Leningrad. You can’t get anything. ” So it turned out: there are no rifles, there are no machine guns, there are no aviation left. We were without artillery. Malenkov says: “An instruction is given to forge the weapon, make peaks, make knives. Fight tanks with bottles, gasoline bottles, throw them and burn the tanks ”... And such an atmosphere was created literally a few weeks! ... If this is then to tell the people, I don’t know how he would react to this. But the people did not learn, of course, from us about such a situation, although by the actual state of things they guessed ”(p. 321).

What is true is true. In one, they were firm in Bolshevik: not to speak to the people. Instead, give an indication. Let them smoke homemade peaks, go to fascists with knives, lie down under tanks with gasoline bottles. The women of the new are inflated ... And then we will indicate them with the front limb beyond the horizon and explain how great and glorious Stalin was and how enemies with traitors blew up the demographic base of Russia ...

Khrushchev, with all his many sins, had a conscience. The quality is “universal” and therefore the “patriots” are despised. Simple! He, unlike them, felt and did not hide his guilt before the country and the people. I did not want to die without repenting. Therefore, he was a traitor. This is their fundamental advantage in the ideological struggle: they lie naturally, as they breathe. Without bothering.

But there is, however, the truth. And behind her reality. Because of her, shameful, any current strategies for the revival of Soviet greatness are originally doomed. Because the greatness was drawn, like the tank power of Mr. Suvorov. Casted from chewing paper, chained in armor from a canbank and plentifully political blood. Nothing else that the USSR would distinguish for the better from other large countries can not be found. The task of the Stalin Renaissance has no solution. More precisely, it lies in the field of imaginary number of propaganda.

Yes, in fact, such a task is not worth it. As it did not stand (at least seriously) the task of building communism before Stalin. The task by any means to maintain power, to force the country to work for military expansion, at the party nomenclature, the owner and its Central Committee - it was. And about communism - this is for grandparents in lines. For Nina Andreeva. The same thing today. Why not talk about the great legacy if it helps the team of like -minded people monopoline gas, oil, automotive, railways pr., Etc.? Why would Lukashenko drop a tear over the “Slavic Union” and the memory of joint battles, if this opens up his path to expand personal power? Why would the Putin brigade not rally the people before the machinations of the West, if this allows you to jump away from honest elections and the risk of losing power on the crooked goat?

Technology on the march

Therefore, the production of ideological weapons of mass destruction continues in mobilization mode according to the non -waste cycle. The insidious “Dulles Plan” (aka “Directive of the US National Security Council No. 20/1 of August 18, 1948”) who was not eaten from the patriots. One of the last is the humble Orthodox schematic Nikita Mikhalkov. And before him are such engineers of human souls as Anatoly Ivanov, Boris Oleinik, Hero of the Soviet Union Vladimir Karpov and even several seemingly respected professional historians.

But they did not give links, of course. Why? In war, as in war. Pooked - pass on to the comrade.

Since the topic, along with the “protocols of the Zion sages”, is repeatedly sucked up to the “Wikipedia”, we will not linger. The essence is clear-boots from papier-mash, designed for the lower sector of purely domestic demand. The sane reader will only shrug: yes never an American bureaucrat, all the CIA director, will not be expressed in such a amused syllable. Here are the choveries-those for a sweet soul. “Indoda gloomed out winter ... And you look-the crown of the beakonosa, throater, entered the raven: we’ll grind them-ragroleg, in the root of the hot ...”

Just as the “Zion sages” (with all their hypothetical harmfulness) will not formulate frankly in writing, and even in the Russian language, the intention to harm the prince king in every way in order to replace it with his Jewish president. Yes, and M. Thatcher will somehow get a bit so as not to disclose in front of Comrade. Parshev and his friends of his kind of aphillic designs.

This is the charm. All these stories with a brain sprout is exactly from our “natural thinker” (such as Konstantin from Shchelkov, who began a telephone career at Echo of Moscow, and now takes out the audience of the RSN). They organically attribute to the adversary exactly the way of thought and actions that is intelligible to the lower quantil of the population. A good subject for sociology: a mirror of consciousness comprehending the world from under the baseboard.

Incidentally, in strict accordance with the basic teaching, which also triggers in front of the lumpen proletariat. What are the eagles in the “exploratory exploration”: “You are a blank, chilling! .. A little more, and your bristles will turn into gold before our eyes!”

Lord, what a grace! After all, it was, we had a real cinema! Stirlitz! And even earlier, the “pig and shepherd”, where the joyful seething of life on Soviet collective farms is reliably reflected. Could such a prosperous reality collapse on its own?! Of course, I could not. So, saboteurs ...

There is subjective meanness and objective trouble.

The meanness is that shallow and even talented people consciously throw the caviar, where they are indicated. They generate bullshit, knowing very well that it is Fuflo. Getting coupons for sugar and the right to kiss power in the ass out of line.

The trouble is that the Lumpen level is reproduced not only for the broad masses, but also for people who make decisions. The cook, which controls the state, visually visually suspects the neighbor of the effort to steal oil from the oil or throw crushed glass into pasta. While a neighbor can have much more large -scale plans that have not been related to a cook value, but a serious threat that is lurking for it. For example, the construction of a good and inexpensive restaurant. "McDonald's", his mother Ity!

Reality still takes his own over time. Two generations ago, a populist lies sounded victorious and subgenus. And today, offended, defenseless. Like, that with the fact that Dulles, Churchill or Thatcher did not say this. After all, they probably thought! And they did it! We, the patriots, as soon as they help them to formulate their enemy position more precisely. Let them say more thanks ...

No, dear, go with this logic to the cook. You thought they thought so. This is your portrait in the mirror. As they really thought, the question is somewhat more complicated. When Mr. Pushkov pushes the words about Siberia in the mouth of Ms. Albright, which, supposedly, is too great for Russia to own her alone, this is wrong for two reasons. Firstly, from the point of view of hygiene. Secondly, the US Secretary of State is a slightly larger figure than a journalist in the third channel. Not the fact that she needs his hints. Comment on her statements - be kind. But to invent for her is a slightly different genre. I don’t know, right, what to call. Something between slander and provocation. But in any case - lies. I wonder how Mr. Pushkov himself determines the nature of his talent?

As if more to explain. You see, the state secrets can be of an arbitrarily bad one, but it is definitely not such a cook that from the height of the official status to express doubt about Russia's legal rights to its legal territories. But Mr. Pushkova with his interior geopolitics is just right. Actually, this is only interesting - as a reflection of the ideas of the Lubyansk brigade about the structure of the world.

Like the general who, with the help of super-technologies, KGB scanned Ms. Olbright and found there pathological hatred of Slavs. A delightful rarity. In the sense of a patriot. If he had seriously such a machine, he would have thundered to a serious international scandal with Mid. God knows how to shine through the brains of someone else's Secretary of State without his consent - not only a gross violation of the protocol and an attempt on personal rights, but also a direct threat to health. Fortunately, everyone understands well what the price is actually a smart general from a Cheka along with his unique technologies. But how organic discourse is, how at ease, it trim it under its growth of readers, and diplomats, and other people's brains!

The topic specifically dismantled Yu. Latynina.

However, there is an epidemiological continuation here. Mr. Pushkov was pumped up, and there at least do not dawn. But the process crawled! While crawled to Siberia, he experienced a mutation. And here is a certain A.I. Shcherbinin in the scientific (!) Article “A look at the reform of the administrative-territorial division of the Russian Federation (Siberian aspect)” is not to defend our sovereign expanses from Madeline Albright, but from the “Formula of Condolizia Rice”. What condoliasis, which means, said: “Siberia is too great to belong to one country” (I quote according to: “Transformation of the Russian space ...”, RAS, M., 2008, p. 114).

Yes, what, in essence, to us patriots, the difference. That that woman, what this one. We, with our mighty nature, we will scan both three times and send it on the karachi. Look, the lips rolled out. Right, eagles?

True. Only someone in the end A larger goat: American ladies who speak out about Putin Russia harshly, but emphasized correctly, or our remote boys who said something, not that, not so and not about those. However, with their sovereign spirituality, all of them - God's dew. Sucked out, and okay. The main thing is to love the homeland.

Of course, Mr. Shcherbinin does not give references to condolysis. Why, if the political fact is well -known throughout its universe? But in a narrower professional sphere, he still seeks to observe decency. And (albeit without a bibliographic link) explains where the leg of the insidious Ms. Rice grows: from the book of Fiona Hill and Clifford Gaddy “Curse of Siberia”. (Correct link: The Siberian Curse. Fiona Hill and Clifford Gaddy. The Brookings Inst., 2003, 303 p. By the way, Mr. Shcherbinin forgot to translate the subtitle: “How communist planning left Russia in the cold.”)

Quite sensitive, I must say, work. With a large number of these facts, with accurate links and evidence. Close to what the folk climatologist Parshev is tormented, but more professional, smarter and therefore with the opposite conclusion: it is not necessary, but massive attracting international capital and concessions. Not in the climate, but in the barbaric Stalinist management.

But now not about that. Is it bad, is the book good is a matter of readers. But to squeeze out of it a certain official “formula” and attributed it to not two American experts, but alternately to two Secretary of State - this is already the work of lupo -eyed consumers/manufacturers of secondary ideological raw materials.

Anyway, having pushed away from the most round -headed from Lubyan analysts, professor of the Russian Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry Igor Panarin, who by 2010 prophesies the California branch from the United States, argue that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs will campaign for the collapse of America.

Clothing of the nucleus, or where does the threat come from the world

Here, in fact, is the whole difference between an adequate perception of reality and life in the Parshevskaya Universe. With predictable results. What our Ulari will not be tight-even on the same Ms. Albright-a zilch and a shameful awkwardness come out everywhere. You have to quickly rise from the knees and leave. But when such artel work is cathedrally established in all key areas, it quickly knocks society from the framework of the mental norm with the subsequent destruction of the family, private property and the state. Or how is Engels?

Complex reality is able to resist for some time forcibly simplification, but not infinite. Especially when it is not too smart, but a well -armed corporation, inspired by a common value concept and serious material interests in a proportional bank.

In order to assess the scale of schizophrenic splitting of reality, it is useful to compare the view of the model of the scoop acting in North Korea through a bona fide description of reality and through the prism of the patriotic Central Committee. At the exit - two completely different phenomena.

As part of the first discourse, it is obvious that the North Korean nuclear collective farm decomposes from the inside and in the ambulance will give the soul to God, in connection with which the global community is brewing serious problems in feeding and arranging a disoriented and fiercely militarized society of more than 20 million people. Perhaps with a nuclear bomb.

In the framework of the second approach, North Korea is the last hope of mankind, a bright island of difficult work happiness. Between the lines it is also felt that Kirdyk is not far off-but solely because of the machinations of imperialism. Meanwhile, the people and nature of the country Juche in touching unity are preparing to celebrate the anniversary of the great leader of Kim Il Sen. Thousands of white herons fly to the modest memorial house in silence, as if in an honorary guard ... And his beloved magnolia for the anniversary gave out a second flowering over the plan ...

And what? Such a reality. Globalism is all right from envy of the successes of the DPRK, to delicate magnolia and white herons. He sleeps and sees how to strangle the freedom -loving people, ruin their shrines and launch dirty hands in the pantries. Although in reality it is not very clear what the DPRK is especially rich, except for sovereign spirituality.

The diagnosis is simple. The soviet patriotism clearly rides a roof. More precisely, he has a slap in his very young. But in the Putin era, this ceased to be a personal business of individual toxicomaniacs and again crawled out to the level of officialdom. Higher in heaven, getting closer to heron. And what, in fact, to do if on the ground a bite for an Obel?

What to do? To be treated. With this patient of the Central Committee, Russia is not dreaming of that, it is not afraid of it, and it is not fighting for that. And, following the Soviet Union, it will come to the wrong outcome. It cannot be otherwise if the reality is a curve. The country cannot maintain mental health if simple conscientiousness and respect for the truth are despised as a bar's whim, and a fabulous lies are revered by valor. Including elections and in court.

From here, by the way, and lawlessness in the camp of security forces, up to the shooting of fellow citizens in the universe or their extermination at pedestrian crossings. Not to mention raiding. The sovereign of the servants, sincerely sipping a value concept, really lost the idea of ​​what is possible, what is impossible. They exist on the other side of good and evil: who, under the mandate and trunk, is right. Well, right Bolsheviks. "The authorities are not mistaken!" К писаным законам, правам сограждан, собственности или к элементарной правде у них то же органичное презрение, что и у высшего начальства. And what? Как учил великий Мао, «винтовка рождает власть». А уж власть (особенно бесконтрольная) рождает все остальное…

Сограждане, в общем, довольны: вон как держава сил набирается. Теперь еще бы настоящую твердую руку, чтобы порядок… Расстрелов бы побольше! А то ведь, коль бога нет, значит, все позволено?! Даешь, стало быть, бога. Да покруче, чтоб, как Сталин. С верной ЧК под рукой. Идея о том, что бог должен быть на небе, а на земле лучше бы начать с простого подчинения закону, такому патриотически-возвышенному дискурсу бесконечно чужда. Какой такой закон?! Знаем мы ваш закон. Это мне, что ли, закон?! Слышал, небось: если бога нет, какой же я капитан-исправник?! С другой стороны, ежели я все ж-таки капитан (помимо бога), то я вам такое здесь устрою – этот ваш бог у меня в денщики запросится!

…Что, собственно, и требовалось доказать.

С подобным багажом, опираясь на вранье, власть и винтовку, они успешно откатывают Россию назад, к предынфарктному состоянию СССР. Собственно, уже откатили – по крайней мере, в смысле желанной для их ЦК международной изоляции.

После того, как они вволю наломают дров и настрогают с Родины бабла, в самом деле настанет реальная (в их представлении) необходимость наведения силового порядка. Заводы останавливаются, зарплату не выдают, работы нет. Перспектив тоже. С внешней политикой труба во всех смыслах. Граждане, еще вчера брызгавшие патриотическим кипятком, помалу начинают возводить хулу. Местные элиты на Москву косоротятся. «Яйцеголовые» уезжают на Запад. Кругом измена! И не хочется, а придется с ними всеми пожестче… А как иначе-то? Иначе никак. Иначе неизбежное отстранение от власти и крайне болезненный разговор о былом рэкете и убийствах. О полонии в Лондоне, о Ямадаеве в Катаре…

Все это естественно и неизбежно для выморочной реальности, где Сталин высится на пьедестале эффективного менеджера. Какие, к чорту, честные выборы (именно так, через «о», как Он писал!) В суровый час испытаний Родине не до гримас буржуазной демократии… Сплотиться вокруг любимого руководства и вперед с песней, к следующей яме.

Как ни крути, а пьедестал, склеенный фальсификашками, не держится без подпорки из штыков. Системное вранье для защиты от действительности требует системного же насилия. Когда беззаконие и есть реальный закон. Отсюда и неизбежное возобновление прерванного было воспроизводства врагов и изменников. Бдительный политолог Сергей Марков (тоже депутат от «Единой России») после очередного путинского провала с Белоруссией уже вскрыл и представил общественности гнездо «пятой колонны» на самом верху власти. В лице вице-премьера А. Кудрина. Молодец, успешно улавливает веяния. Если и забежал вперед паровоза, то совсем чуть-чуть. А главное, из лучших патриотических побуждений!

В перспективе их ЦК все равно проиграет. И страна, само собой, вместе с ним. Вопрос один: сильно ли кровью успеют наследить. Пока получается неплохо. Не говоря про войну в Грузии, про еженедельные взрывы на Северном Кавказе, только в рамках борьбы за духовную самобытность Россия поднялась на одно из первых мест по числу убитых журналистов. На равных конкурирует с самыми варварскими режимами Африки и Азии. Скоро обгонит: мы, в соответствии с Учением, входим в штопор обостряющейся классовой борьбы по мере подъема с колен. Вредителей все больше. Врать и стрелять приходится все чаще. Победы все громогласней. Вот, только что, еще одна – в битве при Селигере.

В общем, беда с их патриотическим ЦК. Куда ни кинь, всюду клин. Прямой путь в Иран или в Северную Корею. Что более чем устраивает Паршева, Дугина, Проханова или Суворова с Путиным. Для них, кроме как в идейной консервной банке, среды обитания просто не существует.

Теперь вопрос, как именно лечиться. На мой взгляд, лечение несложное, но длительное. Разрыв между реальностью и действительностью зашивается с помощью правды. Именно она опускает вознесшихся от собственной значимости победителей на грешную землю еще до того, как они окончательно проели все ресурсы и вошли в смертельное пике. Если бал правит ложь – то летать можно дольше и слаще. Но и падать значительно больнее – в первую очередь для народа.

Так что задача, в сущности, проста: провалы называть провалами, глупость глупостью, голого короля – голым королем. Легко, как в сказке. Но никакой другой, более тяжелой проблемы для настоящей, не сказочной России я, уважаемые коллеги, на сегодня не вижу. Так что уж простите за Паршева: приходится разгребать.

Photos of RIA Novosti