Mid January 2011 years we became aware of some details regarding the recently raised us the problems of court sites on which in the "extremist" section are placed completely unrelated to it affairs.
We were contacted from Gagarinsky District Court of Smolensk areas, on whose site we are for the first time found at least 11 liquidation decisions primary union organizations recorded in the section "From page 46 - on liquidation in connection with extremist activities (Article 9 of the Federal Law "On countering extremist activity). At the same time, it was quite obvious that All these organizations were closed reasons unrelated to extremism.
How said in the message of the Gagarin court, these cases ended up in the section of extremist "through negligence of the responsible employee and in connection with the characteristics electronic program". information in this section was for reference, and not reporting (note that unprepared to the observer this nuance is obscure). IN court report for 2010 in the relevant section is a dash, since the cases of this The category was not considered by the court.
We glad the misunderstanding is cleared up that There is currently no incorrect information on the site, However, we would like to understand how made possible because it is not the only such case.
Exactly in the same way on the website of the Dzerzhinsky district ships of Perm last year we discovered the case of the closure of the organization of the disabled. This case is today in the same category, and to it during this time was added also the case of the liquidation of the children's sports schools.
More likely everything, it's still not so much a human factor, how much in the imperfection of the GAS system "Justice", which used by Russian courts to accommodate information on the Internet.
Sources