Sanctions against heads of educational institutions. Part 2

In March 2008, Rosobrazovanie (later abolished and reorganized into the Ministry of Education and Science) provided all Russian schools with licensed software packages, including which is included in the Internet access content filtering program. How it turned out that this program does not cope with the task, which was found out as a result of prosecutorial checks throughout the country. Absolutely it is obvious that the fault is that schoolchildren, despite access filters, have the opportunity to visit neo-Nazi and other inappropriate sites, lies not only with schools that do not update with the necessary regularity of the software, but also at the Ministry of Education and Science, which installed an insufficiently effective product. Note that not all items on the Federal List of Extremist Materials designed in such a way that they can be used as a guide to action (sometimes, when it comes to a site, its address can be reflected not completely or even completely absent, but the titles of books and articles are given without imprint).

Except Moreover, we cannot but note that the very idea of fighting against help filters with extremism in schools seems to us wrong. Firstly, any filter can be bypassed if desired, and secondly, in principle it is impossible to compile an exhaustive list of addresses and keywords.

Tem nevertheless, prosecutors everywhere and regularly punish for this local officials and school leaders. We believe that for imperfection content filtering systems must comply with the Ministry of Education and Science, and the negligence of the leadership of schools that do not update the program is a problem rather labor discipline than law enforcement.

We have combined such cases into a single list, the first part of which covers the period from December 2009 to June 2011, and the continuation of this list is in front of you.

On June 21, 2012, it became known about the lawsuits filed by the prosecutor's office of the Suojärvi district of the Republic of Karelia due to the fact that the content filters installed on computers in the Piitskiek and Veshkel schools of the district "did not completely exclude" access to materials included in the Federal List .
On June 21, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Kharovskiy District of the Vologda Oblast reported on the submission made to the director of the Kharovskaya School No. 3. The reason for this was that the content filters installed on the school computers functioned "inappropriately" and did not prevent the opening of extremist materials. The prosecutor's office also reported that such violations were found in schools No. 1 and 2 of Nikolsk, Kharovsky district (where the inspectors were able to get access to the texts of B. Mussolini and Yu. Graf), in connection with which the prosecutor's office filed lawsuits with the court for the obligation to eliminate violations of the law ( the requirements of the prosecutor's office were satisfied, the violations were eliminated).
On June 21, 2012, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Zheleznodorozhny district of Barnaul issued a submission to an unnamed employee of the Altai Institute of Economics and Law due to the fact that there were no content filters on the computers in the computer science rooms at the institute. The incident is included in this collection, since universities should not set such filters at all, since they enroll adult citizens.
On June 20, 2012, it became known that a prosecutor's check revealed violations of the installation of content filters on school computers in Ostrovskaya and Ekaterinovskaya rural schools in the Livensky district of the Oryol region. The filters installed on the computers were not, according to the assistant prosecutor, " strong enough " to block access to extremist material. The prosecutor's office reports that the director of the Ostrov school was brought to disciplinary responsibility. Sanctions of the prosecutor's office in relation to the director of the Ekaterinovskaya school are unknown.
On June 15, 2012, it became known about the submission made by the prosecutor's office of Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk region, to the director of the city's special closed school No. 124 in connection with the fact that school computers had access to extremist materials. Whether content filters were installed on these computers, we do not know, but we proceed from the fact that otherwise the prosecutor's office would have indicated their absence. It is known that incorrectly working content filters were detected in schools No. 21 and 48 in Yekaterinburg, schools No. 10 in Alapaevsk, No. 27 in Artemovsky, and No. 3 in Kirovgrad, Sverdlovsk Region, however, no prosecutorial response measures were reported in these cases.
On June 6, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Kaluga region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Maloyaroslavetsky district had made submissions on the elimination of violations of the law on countering extremism to the directors of the district's comprehensive schools. The reason was that the content filters installed on school computers turned out to be inoperative, and students had access to prohibited materials. The acts of the prosecutor's response were considered, five officials were brought to disciplinary responsibility, and measures were taken to eliminate violations.
On June 6, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Volgograd region announced that the prosecutor's office of the Ilovlinsky district of the Volgograd region had made submissions to eliminate violations of the law on countering extremism against the directors of Ilovlinskaya secondary school No. 1 and Ilovlinskaya secondary school No. 2, as well as Bolsheivanovskaya secondary school. The reason was that during the check it turned out that access to extremist materials is possible from school computers. Violations were eliminated, responsible persons were subjected to disciplinary sanctions. We do not know if content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On June 4, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Novgorod Region reported that the Starorusskaya Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office filed lawsuits against the administration of two schools in the city of Staraya Russa demanding that children be denied access to prohibited information. The reason was that during the check it turned out that, despite the installed content filters, it is possible to access the websites of extremist organizations containing prohibited materials from school computers. The cases were considered by the Starorussky District Court, but the proceedings were terminated due to the fact that the schools voluntarily complied with the requirements of the prosecutor.
On June 1, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Central District of Togliatti announced a statement of claim to the district court in connection with the fact that one of the computers installed in school No. 13 of Togliatti made it possible to access an article included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. Unfortunately, we do not know if content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On June 1, 2012, it became known about 6 statements of claim filed with the court by the Nurlat City Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Tatarstan. The reason for the lawsuits was that, despite the content filters installed on the computers of six schools in the city of Nurlat, inspectors from the prosecutor's office were able to gain access to extremist materials. The court granted the demands of the prosecutor's office.
On May 31, 2012, it became known about the submission made to the head of the Soviet Territorial Administration of the Education Department of the Volgograd Administration by the Prosecutor's Office of the Soviet District of Volgograd. The reason for the presentation was that the computers at school No. 58 had access to "extremist materials." Unfortunately, we do not know if content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On May 31, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the city of Verkhniy Ufaley, Chelyabinsk Region, reported that directors of three schools in the city had been challenged because the content filters installed on school computers " allowed students to get acquainted with information of extremist content ." According to the prosecutor's office, school leaders were brought to disciplinary responsibility.
On May 24, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Tatarstan announced that the prosecutor's office of the Mamadyshsky district had made submissions to eliminate violations of the law on countering extremism against the administration of three secondary schools in the city of Mamadysh and a secondary school in the village of Srednyaya Oshma. The reason was that content filters installed on school computers did not completely block access to extremist sites. The demands of the prosecutor's office were satisfied.
On May 24, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Poltava district of the Omsk region announced 24 statements of claim against the directors of the district's schools, from which it follows that the content filtering system installed in schools "does not exclude access by underage Internet users " to extremist materials. According to the prosecutor's office, the court satisfied the demands of the prosecutor, violations of the law have been eliminated.
On May 23, 2012, information appeared about the submissions made to the directors of schools No. 1 and No. 2 of Ilovlya and the Bolsheivanovskaya school by the prosecutor's office of the Ilovlinsky district of the Volgograd region. The reason for the submissions was that the content filters installed on school computers did not prevent access to materials included in the Federal List - in particular, to G. Dubrov's books "Generals on the Jewish Mafia" and "On the Radio Engineering Troops and not only ... ".
On May 18, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Nizhny Novgorod region announced that the prosecutor's office of the Dalnekonstantinovsky district had made 8 submissions on the elimination of violations of the law on countering extremism against the leaders of the district's schools. According to the prosecutor's office, 5 submissions were considered and the violations were eliminated. The reason for making submissions was that the content filters installed on school computers could not cope with the task.
On May 16, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Altai Territory reported that the Deputy Prosecutor of the Republic of Altai submitted a motion to eliminate violations of the law on countering extremism to the rector of the Gorno-Altai State University. The reason was that during the audit it turned out that the content filters installed on university computers do not completely block access, in particular, to extremist materials on the network. As a result, the university administration updated the content filtering system and brought the relevant official to disciplinary responsibility.
On May 4, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Arkhangelsk Region announced an audit that showed that the content filtering systems installed on computers at the Northern State Medical University and the Northern Arctic Federal University do not prevent access to extremist materials. Unfortunately, it is not clear from the report what kind of measures of the prosecutor's response were applied in this case. We add that the installation of content filters in universities is not provided at all.
On May 2, 2012, it became known about the submissions that the Dankovsky Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of the Lipetsk Region submitted to the head of the district department of education and the directors of schools in the villages of Bigildino, Speshnevo-Ivanovskoye, Politovo, gymnasium No. 1, evening school and professional lyceum No. 9 of the city of Dankov. The reason for the response was the results of the audit, which showed that the content filtering system installed in computer classes " does not fully meet the tasks of protecting children from the negative impact of harmful information " and does not prevent access to extremist materials.
On April 28, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of Pyatigorsk (Stavropol Territory) reported five submissions to the administration of the city's universities, motivated by the fact that content filters were not installed on the computers in the computer science classrooms in these educational institutions. Universities reportedly subsequently installed appropriate filtration systems. The case is included in this collection because higher education institutions should not set such filters at all, since they teach adult citizens.
On April 28, 2012, it became known about the submission made by the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic to the head of the local provider Vainakh Telecom. The reason for the presentation was the results of an audit that showed that in schools in Grozny and one of the city's Internet clubs using the services of Vainakh Telecom, websites included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials are available.
On April 27, 2012, information appeared about a submission made by the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic to the republican minister of education and science due to the fact that content filters installed on computers in the republic's schools "do not provide adequate protection for students" from extremist materials .
On April 25, 2012, it became known that the Iskitim inter-district prosecutor's office of the Novosibirsk region made representations to the heads of administrations of the city of Iskitim and the Iskitim district, and also sent 10 claims to the court against the directors of the district's schools due to the fact that the content filters installed in schools " completely volume does not exclude "access of students to extremist materials.
On April 17, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Rovno district of the Saratov region announced a statement of claim about imposing on the director of the school of the Vladimirsky village of the Rovno district the obligation to ensure the proper operation of the content filtering system software. The reason for the lawsuit was the results of an audit that revealed that the filters installed on school computers "do not fully" prevent access to extremist materials. The requirements of the prosecutor's office were satisfied in full.
On April 10, 2012, it became known about the submission made to the director of school No. 5 in the city of Satka, Chelyabinsk Region, in particular, due to the fact that inspectors from the Satka city prosecutor's office had access to sites from school computers "which describe the advantages of the extremist community and campaigning for entry into his ranks." Unfortunately, we do not know if content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On April 9, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Saratov Region announced a submission submitted to the Ministry of Education of the Saratov Region on the elimination of violations identified in three schools (including School No. 51) and four vocational schools in the region. The violations consisted in the fact that the content filtering system installed on computers in educational institutions "does not fully prevent access to information on the Internet that is incompatible with the goals and objectives of education and upbringing."
On April 4, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Volodarsky district of Bryansk reported on the presentation made to the head of vocational school No. 19 in Bryansk due to the fact that despite the content filters installed on the computers at the school, extremist materials are not updated.
On March 29, 2012, it became known about the submissions made by the prosecutor's office of the Saratov district of the Saratov region to the directors of schools in the Tarkhany station, Dubki and Teplichny settlements, since the content filters installed on school computers did not prevent access to extremist materials.
On March 28, 2012, it became known about the submissions made by the Rossosh inter-district prosecutor's office of the Voronezh region to directors of schools in the city of Rossosh due to the fact that school computers were not provided with "full protection by the filtering system", which made it possible to gain access to extremist materials. Unfortunately, the number of submissions in the report of the prosecutor's office is not indicated.
On March 28, 2012, it became known about the submissions made by the Uglegorsk City Prosecutor's Office of the Sakhalin Region to the directors of schools No. 5 and No. 2 in Uglegorsk due to the fact that school computers had access to the book "Russian World Order" by Yuri Petukhov, included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials . It is also reported about the statements of claim filed in connection with this by the prosecutor's office to the court. Unfortunately, we do not know if content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On March 27, 2012, it became known about the submissions made by the Ney inter-district prosecutor's office of the Kostroma region to the directors of school No. 1 in the city of Ney and Soltanovskaya secondary school in the Ney district due to the fact that despite the installed content filters, it was possible to access "quotes from the book" from school computers A. Hitler "Mein Kampf".
On March 26, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra announced that the prosecutor's office of the city of Langepas had filed a motion to eliminate the violation of the law on countering extremism against the director of secondary school No. 1. The reason for making the submission was that, as a result of the check, it turned out that from school computers it is possible to access the forbidden books "The Myth of the Holocaust. The Truth about the Fate of the Jews in World War II" by Y. Graf and "The Russian Answer to the Jewish Question" by A. Bragin .
On March 20, 2012, it became known about the submissions that the Nazarovo interdistrict prosecutor's office of the Krasnoyarsk Territory issued to the directors of schools No. 8 and 14 in the city of Nazarovo, as well as the head of the city House of Pioneers and Schoolchildren institutions, did not hinder access to extremist materials.
On March 20, 2012, it became known about the submission made by the Taishet Transport Prosecutor's Office of the Irkutsk Region to the director of boarding school No. 24 of JSC Russian Railways due to the fact that despite the content filtering systems installed on school computers, students had access to materials included in the Federal List extremist materials . The prosecutor's office also filed a lawsuit in court, but withdrew the application due to the fact that the requirements were satisfied.
On March 20, 2012, it became known about the response measures taken by the prosecutor's office of Zarinsk (Altai Territory) to a number of schools in the city (the number of schools is not specified) due to the fact that the content filters installed on school computers "do not fully" exclude access to extremist materials .
On March 19, 2012, it became known that the Ural Transport Prosecutor's Office issued a warning to the Perm Railway Institute, a branch of the Ural State University of Communications, due to the fact that the content filtering systems installed at the institute allow students to access extremist materials. This is the second warning issued to the university: in 2011, a prosecutor's check revealed the absence of content filters, after which a filtering system was installed.
On March 12, 2012, it became known about the submissions made by the prosecutor's office of the Issinsky district of the Penza region to the administration of the Issinsky district and the director of the school in the village of Bulychevo, due to the fact that the content filters installed on school computers "do not guarantee complete restriction" to materials included in the Federal List extremist materials.
On March 12, 2012, information appeared about 10 submissions made by the prosecutor's office of the Vurnarsky district of the Chuvash Republic to the directors of the district's educational institutions due to the fact that despite the content filters installed on computers, students had access to sites with materials of an extremist nature. Representations, in particular, were made to the leaders of the Vurnar Agricultural College and the Maloyaush School.
On March 6, 2012, it became known about the submissions made by the prosecutor's offices of the Ivanovo region to the heads of schools and local authorities of the Frunzensky district of Ivanovo, Kineshma, Teikovsky, Shuisky, Gavrilovo-Posadsky, Zavolzhsky, Yuzhsky, Lukhsky, Palekhsky districts, due to the fact that " Despite the installation of content filtering, " students had access to " websites and materials with nationalist content ."
On March 1, 2012, it became known about two lawsuits filed by the prosecutor's office of the Kozlovsky district of the Chuvash Republic, due to the fact that "as a result of improper organization of content filtering " from computers in the Andreevo-Bazarskaya and Tyurleminskaya schools of the district there was access to " information of an extremist nature " .
On February 29, 2012, it became known about the submissions made by the prosecutor's office of the city of Berezniki, Perm Territory, against the directors of five schools in the city due to the fact that access to materials of an extremist nature was possible from school computers. Unfortunately, we do not know if content filters were installed on the computers in the Internet classrooms, however, we proceed from the fact that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On February 27, 2012, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Danilovsky district of the Volgograd region made a submission to the head of the education department of the district administration, as a result of which the director of the Krasnyanskaya secondary school was held accountable. The reason for the penalties was that during the audit it turned out that the NetPolise content filtering system installed on school computers did not prevent access to extremist materials, including Hitler's Mein Kampf.
On February 16, 2012, it became known about the submission made by the prosecutor's office of the Ulyanovsk region to the regional minister of education. The submission was made due to the fact that prosecutor's checks in 2011 revealed that the content filters installed on the school computers of 37 schools in the region do not restrict access to materials of an "extremist nature."
On February 13, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Saratov region announced that the Pugachev inter-district prosecutor's office filed a lawsuit against the Pugachev boarding school and the Pugachev hydro-reclamation technical school. V.I.Chapaeva duties to ensure the proper operation of the software of the Internet content filtering system. The reason for filing a lawsuit was that, as a result of the audit, it turned out that the content filter available in these educational institutions "does not fully prevent access to information that is incompatible with the goals and objectives of education and upbringing of pupils and students" , including to materials of extremist content.
On February 9, 2012, it became known about the submissions made by the prosecutor's office of the Kadysky district of the Kostroma region to the heads of the Stolpinskaya, Chernyshevskaya, Zavrazhnaya, Ekaterinka schools due to the fact that the content filtering systems installed on school computers of teachers "do not prevent" receiving links to sites " containing propaganda extremist information .
On February 7, 2012, it became known that, based on the results of a prosecutor's check conducted in November 2011 in the Republic of Buryatia, court decisions were made against the directors of the Ust-Orot, Mogsokhon, Kodun secondary schools, since the content filtering system installed on school computers ("First help") allowed access to sites with materials of an extremist nature. As part of the enforcement proceedings, schools have installed a different system of content filtration and the "Parental Control" option duplicating it.
On February 2, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Dobrinsky district of the Lipetsk region announced that it had submitted a submission to the director of the secondary educational school in the village of Petrovsky. The reason for the submission was that the filtering system on the computers of the informatics office “did not block unwanted Internet resources in full,” in particular, the search engine provided links to sites containing extremist materials.
On January 31, 2012, it became known about the submission made by the prosecutor's office of the Purovsky district of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug to the heads of the district's educational institutions in connection with the fact that school computers had access to information "with signs of extremist activity . " Unfortunately, we do not know if content filters were installed on the computers in the Internet classrooms, however, we proceed from the fact that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On January 11, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Arkhangelsk Region announced the measures taken by it in 2011 due to the fact that content filtering programs and systems for updating them in schools of Pinezhsky, Isakogorsky, Vinogradovsky, Kargopolsky, Kholmogorsky, Solombalsky, Lensky, Onega, ZATO Mirny " do not provide adequate information filtering " and do not prevent access to extremist materials. 20 submissions were made to the heads of schools and municipal education authorities, one warning was announced, two statements of claim were submitted to the court (satisfied).
On December 26, 2011, it became known about the submission made by the prosecutor's office of the Oktyabrsky district of Stavropol to the director of the Stavropol Institute of Economics and Management named after O.V. Kaznacheev - a branch of the Pyatigorsk State Humanitarian and Technological University. Among other violations found at the university during the audit is the fact that the content filtering system installed on computers in the institute's library does not provide "effective protection for students" from "destructive information", including extremist materials.
On December 20, 2011, it became known about a lawsuit filed by the prosecutor's office of Volgodonsk against the city administration and the department of culture, in which it demands to exclude access to extremist materials and websites of organizations recognized as extremist from computers installed in city libraries that are part of the Centralized Library System, and also at the Central Children's and Youth Library No. 3. The incident is included in this compilation because the prosecution's claims are identical to those faced by school workers.
On December 19, 2011, it became known about the submissions made by the prosecutor's office of the Kuvshinovsky district of the Tver region against the directors of two schools in Kuvshinov, as well as schools in the village of Pryamukhino, the village of Zaovrazhye and the village of Sokolniki, due to the fact that the content filtering systems installed in schools "do not fully exclude access to sites containing extremist materials.
December 8, 2011 year it became known about the presentation to the heads of three educational institutions (two higher educational institutions and vocational schools) entered as a result of the audit, conducted jointly by the Prosecutor's Office of Omsk and the Center for Combating extremism of the police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the Omsk region. Library computers had access "through the network Internet" to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. Unfortunately, it is not known whether library computers were installed content filters.
On December 8, 2011, it became known about the statement of claim of the prosecutor's office of Dolinsk, Sakhalin Region. The prosecutor's office demands to oblige the city library to "restrict access to extremist Internet resources", since the employees who carried out the check were able to get access to the "White Primer", included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials . Whether content filters were installed on the library computers is not known, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would have pointed out their absence. The incident is included in this compilation because the prosecutor's claims are identical to those faced by school workers.
On December 5, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Rostov region announced that it had filed a complaint against the director of the Don State Public Library due to the fact that library computers had free access to prohibited sites and texts. As stated in the message of the prosecutor's office, "measures to restrict access to extremist literature turned out to be insufficient." We include this case in the compilation because the situation is identical to that faced by school workers.
On December 1, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra announced that the prosecutor's office of the Nizhnevartovsk region had submitted recommendations to the leaders of the district's schools to eliminate violations of the law. The violations consisted in the fact that content filters installed in computer classes do not prevent access to prohibited information, including "materials of an extremist nature." This is the second show of its kind this year.
On November 29, 2011, it became known that the prosecutor's office of Gorno-Altaisk (Republic of Altai) made submissions to the leaders of the special (correctional) boarding school of 1-2 types, lyceum No. 6, republican classical lyceum, gymnasium No. 3, republican gymnasium named after. G.K. Plakas, cadet school No. 4, boarding school No. 1 for orphans and children left without parental care. G.K. Zhukov, secondary schools No. 7, 10, elementary school No. 5, since the computer classes of these institutions had access to a site that hosted materials recognized by the court as extremist. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters were installed on the computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would have indicated their absence.
On November 25, 2011, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Romodanovsky district of the Republic of Mordovia filed a lawsuit with the district court due to the fact that the content filtering systems installed in four schools in the district “do not fully” provide protection from information “harmful to moral and spiritual development [of children] that promotes anti-social behavior". In 2010, the district prosecutor's office had already made submissions to school principals to eliminate similar violations, content filters were installed, but, as the audit showed, they acted selectively.
On November 10, 2011, it became known that in the third quarter of 2011 the prosecutor of Gorno-Altaysk made representations to the directors of 4 schools in the city due to the fact that content filtering systems in computer classes "inadequately" exclude students' access to the Internet. resources "containing materials of an extremist nature."
On November 1, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the city of Kostomuksha (Republic of Karelia) announced that the head of the administration of the Kostomuksha city district had submitted a proposal to eliminate violations of anti-extremist legislation. It is reported that in four schools, "due to improper organization of content filtering on personal computers used in the educational process," students had access to Hitler's writings, information about the RNU and other prohibited materials.
On October 27, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Oktyabrsky administrative district of Omsk announced that from the computers of the municipal libraries named after. A.P. Chekhov and them. I.A. Krylov, it was possible for visitors to access a number of sites "which are classified as extremist materials." The district attorney filed a lawsuit in which he demanded that the library be ordered to restrict access to the sites. The court granted the prosecutor's request. The episode is included in our selection because the claims here are identical to the usual claims against schools.
On October 25, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Kostroma district of the Kostroma region announced an audit, as a result of which it was established that from the computers of the computer science classrooms of the Chernopensk, Zarubinsk and Serednyakovskaya secondary schools there was free access to the site http://protiv.tv with leaflets "Soldiers of the Reich!! "Remember them! These people have accomplished what you failed in years of bloody efforts!" and “Before you is a miracle invention, “Televizator!”, included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. Based on the results of the check, the head of the district administration, the director of the provider company and school principals were issued recommendations, violations were eliminated, access to the site was blocked. Is there a system in schools content filtering, it is not clear from the prosecutor's report, but we assume that the prosecutor's office would indicate their absence, since filtering programs are installed in the vast majority of Russian schools.
On October 21, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Irkutsk region announced that it had carried out an inspection in the educational institutions of the region, which showed that in a number of schools content filtering is either completely absent or not carried out in full. Unfortunately, it is not clear from the report of the prosecutor's office how many schools are involved, nor what sanctions were applied in each case.
October 17, 2011 Kashinskaya the interdistrict prosecutor's office of the Tver region reported on the submission made in address of the MOU "Secondary school No. 3". According to the prosecutor's office, the administration the school "has not taken exhaustive measures" to restrict access to websites included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On October 4, 4011, the prosecutor's office of the Toropetsky district of the Tver region reported on the submission made to the head of the administration of the Toropetsky district based on the results of an inspection of two schools, where the content filtering system "incompletely" excludes access to resources, "including those of an extremist nature." As a result of the presentation, the directors of both schools were brought to disciplinary responsibility.
On October 3, 2011, the Taishet Transport Prosecutor's Office (Irkutsk Region) announced that a lawsuit had been filed with the court to force boarding school No. 24 of Russian Railways to improve the software of computer classes in order to exclude access to "extremist" sites.
On September 26, 2011, the Borisoglebsk Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of the Voronezh Region announced that it had filed submissions against the directors of two general education schools, where, despite the established content filters, there was access to "extremist information" from computers.
On September 26, 2011, the Prosecutor's Office of the Olonetsky District of the Republic of Karelia reported that the principals of four local schools were submitted with a demand to discipline employees. The reason was that from school computers it was possible to access nationalist sites. Unfortunately, the prosecutor’s report does not say exactly whether there were content filtering programs in schools, but based on the wording about the absence of “effective” control, we believe that there was some kind of control in schools, it just turned out to be not effective enough. Since the mentioned programs should be installed in all schools by default, and their absence is a rare exception to the rule, we put this case on this list.
On September 14, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Sormovsky district of Nizhny Novgorod reported that during the audit, violations of the law on combating extremism were revealed at school No. 76 and other schools in the district. The prosecutor's office found that content filters installed on school computers were ineffective. Unfortunately, there is no information on the measures taken by the prosecutor's response.
On September 1, 2011, the Prosecutor's Office of the Novgorod Region reported that five employees of schools in the Novgorod District were disciplined because the content filtering system installed on school computers did not block access to the websites of a number of organizations recognized as extremist.
On August 26, 2011, the Prosecutor's Office of the Arkhangelsk Region announced that the Konoshsky District Court had satisfied the claim of the District Prosecutor's Office and ordered the Konosha Secondary School to prevent students from accessing Internet resources with extremist content. The reason for the lawsuit was that during the audit it turned out that the content filters installed on school computers do not provide complete protection, in particular, access to the websites of extremist organizations was possible from them.
On August 25, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Belinsky district of the Penza region announced that, according to its submissions, 5 directors and 6 teachers of secondary schools Nos. The reason was that despite the system of content filtering installed on school computers, it was possible to access materials banned for extremism from them.
On August 24, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Khakassia announced that the prosecutor's office of the Bogradsky district had submitted a proposal to eliminate violations of the law on countering extremism against the district administration. The reason was that installed on the computers of the Bograd Central Library. S.L. Pestunov's filters were not configured properly, and users had access to sites containing extremist materials. We believe that in this case, although the district administration suffered, we are talking about the same problems for which the leadership of educational institutions is usually punished.
16 August 2011 Novokuznetsk transport prosecutor's office announced making a submission to the director of boarding school No. 19 of Russian Railways, as well as about going to court demanding to oblige the boarding school improve the software. The reason was that software installed on school computers provided blocking access to extremist sites.
On July 15, 2011, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Tuva reported that as a result of the audit, 11 claims were filed with the Ulug-Khemsky District Court, one of which was satisfied. The court ordered the Shagonar secondary school to introduce additional parameters into the content filtering system on school computers by August 31, 2011 in order to prevent access to a number of extremist sites
14 July 2011 Prosecutor's Office of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Yugra reported that the prosecutor's office of Nizhnevartovsk had made submissions on the elimination of violations of the law against directors of a number of city educational institutions. occasion was the fact that as a result of the audit it turned out that from school computers can access sites containing information extremist nature. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether there were computers have content filters installed, but we proceed from the fact that the prosecutor's office would point out their absence, since the filtering programs installed in the vast majority of Russian schools.
14 July 2011, the Tambov Region Prosecutor's Office reported that the prosecutor's office of the Oktyabrsky district made submissions about elimination of violations of the law against the leaders of the Tambov branch of the Moscow New Law Institute and MUK "Centralized Library System", and the question was raised about bringing to disciplinary responsibility those responsible for violations officials. The reason was that, as a result of the check it turned out that from the computers of institutions it is possible to access sites which contain extremist materials and "are not protected by the content filtering.
6 July 2011, the Prosecutor's Office of the Kaluga Region reported that submissions were made on the elimination of violations of the law against directors of seven educational institutions of the Ulyanovsk region, as well as disciplinary action against those found guilty of violations officials. The reason was that, as a result of the check it turned out that the filters installed on school computers did not prevent students from accessing websites containing extremist materials.

Sources

Violations of the legislation on education and countering extremist activity were revealed in educational institutions of the Ulyanovsk region // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Kaluga Region. 2011. July 6.
The prosecutor's office demanded to eliminate violations of the law on countering extremism // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Tambov region. 2011. July 14.
The prosecutor's office revealed violations in the schools of the city of Nizhnevartovsk, in which schoolchildren had free access to sites containing information of an extremist nature // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Yugra. 2011. July 14.
Violations of federal legislation on countering extremist activity were established by a prosecutor's check in municipal educational institutions of the Ulug-Khemsky district of the Republic of Tyva // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Tuva. 2011. July 15.
In the educational institution of Novokuznetsk, violations of the law on combating extremist activity were revealed // Website of the West Siberian Transport Prosecutor's Office. 2011. 16 August.
The prosecutor's office of the Bogradsky district in the activities of local governments revealed violations of the legislation on countering extremism // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Khakassia. 2011. 24 August.
11 educators were punished in the Penza region as a result of an audit of the implementation of legislation on countering extremism // Website of the Office of the General Prosecutor's Office of Russia in the Volga Federal District. 2011. August 25.
In Konosha High School, children could freely visit extremist websites // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Arkhangelsk region. 2011. August 26.
Violations of legislation on countering extremism revealed in schools in the Novgorod region // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Novgorod region. 2011. September 1st.
The prosecutor's office revealed violations in terms of preventing the spread of extremist ideas in a number of schools in the Sormovsky district of Nizhny Novgorod // NIA "Nizhny Novgorod". 2011. September 14. http://www.niann.ru/?id=396842&template=yandex The prosecutor's office revealed violations in terms of preventing the spread of extremist ideas in a number of schools in the Sormovsky district of Nizhny Novgorod // NIA "Nizhny Novgorod". 2011. September 14.
The Internet in schools remained without control // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Karelia. 2011. September 26.
In the city of Borisoglebsk, the prosecutor's office takes measures to restrict students' access to Internet resources that harm their moral and spiritual development // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Voronezh region. 2011. September 26.
The prosecutor's office of the Toropetsky district revealed violations of the legislation on education in two educational institutions // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Tver region. 2011. October 4th.
Kashin interdistrict prosecutor's office protects the rights of minors to safe Internet access // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Tver region. 2011. October 17.
The board of the regional prosecutor's office considered the results of the audit of the implementation of legislation on accessible and free general and preschool education, the safety of the educational process // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Irkutsk region. 2011. October 21.
//
In the Kostroma district, the prosecutor's office checked the implementation of legislation on the prevention of extremism in educational institutions // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Kostroma region. 2011. October 25.
The Prosecutor's Office of the Oktyabrsky Administrative District of Omsk takes measures to restrict access to extremist materials // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Omsk region. 2011. October 27.
The prosecutor's office demanded to restrict schoolchildren's access to extremist sites // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Karelia. 2011. November 1.
The prosecutor's office of the republic summed up the results of the implementation of supervisory activities for the implementation of the priority national project "Education" in the 3rd quarter of 2011 // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Altai. 2011. November 10.
The prosecutor's office eliminated students' access to dangerous information // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Mordovia. 2011. November 25.
The Prosecutor's Office of Gorno-Altaisk takes measures aimed at eliminating violations of the law on the protection of children from information that is harmful to their health, reputation, moral development and upbringing // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Altai. November 29, 2011.
The prosecutor's office revealed violations in educational institutions in which minors got access to sites with information promoting drugs and extremism // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra. 2011. December 1.
The Dolinsk City Prosecutor filed a lawsuit demanding that the Municipal Budgetary Institution of Culture Dolinsk Centralized Library System restrict access to extremist Internet resources. // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Sakhalin Region. 2011. December 8.
Employees of the Center for Combating Extremism of the Police Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Omsk Region conducted inspections of educational institutions // Website of the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Omsk region. 2011. December 8.
The prosecutor's office of the Kuvshinovsky district conducted an audit of the implementation of the legislation on education // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Tver region. 2011. December 19.
The prosecutor's office of the city of Volgodonsk demands through the court to exclude access to negative Internet sites in libraries that promote extremism, terrorism, drugs and suicides // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Rostov region. 2011. December 20.
Checks of branches of universities in the Stavropol region continue // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Stavropol Territory. 2011. December 26.
On the results of the audit of countering extremism and terrorism // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Arkhangelsk region. 2012. January 11.
At the request of the Prosecutor of the Purovsky District, educational institutions eliminated violations in the implementation of the priority national project "Education" and the prevention of extremism // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug. 2012. January 31.
The prosecutor's office of the district stopped the free access of schoolchildren to unwanted resources of the Internet // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Lipetsk Region. 2012. February 2.
Schoolchildren restricted access to prohibited sites // Website of the Office of the Bailiff Service in the Republic of Buryatia. 2012. February 7.
The prosecutor's office of the Kady district conducted an audit of compliance with the legislation in the field of implementation of the priority national project "Education" // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Kostroma Region. February 9, 2012.
The Pugachev inter-district prosecutor's office conducted an audit of compliance with legislation aimed at protecting the morality of minors when using the Internet // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Saratov region. 2012. February 13.
The prosecutor's office ensures the protection of the interests of minors // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Ulyanovsk region. 2012. February 16.
Evgenia Petrova. At the Danilov school, children could read "Mein Kampf" on the Internet // V1.ru. 2012. February 27.
Berezniki students in schools got access to pornographic and extremist sites // City of Berezniki. February 29, 2012.
On the results of the audit carried out by the prosecutor's office of the Kozlovsky district of the implementation of legislation aimed at protecting the rights of children from information disseminated on the Internet that harms their moral development and mental health // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Chuvash Republic. 2012. March 1.
On the work of the prosecutor's office in the field of counteracting the dissemination of prohibited or restricted information on the Internet // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Ivanovo region. 2012. March 6.
News. 12 Mar 2012 // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Chuvash Republic. 2012. March 12.
Issinsky district prosecutor's office counteracts extremism // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Penza Region. 2012. March 12.
The prosecutor's office of Zarinsk conducted an audit of compliance with the legislation in the field of protecting children from information that is harmful to their health, spiritual and moral development in educational institutions of the city // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Altai Territory. 2012. March 20.
In the Irkutsk region, the Taishet Transport Prosecutor's Office took response measures on the revealed facts of violation of the legislation on countering extremist activities // Website of the East Siberian Transport Prosecutor's Office. 2012. March 20.
On protecting the rights of children from negative information on the Internet // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. 2012. March 20.
Perm Railway Institute is held accountable for violations in the field of information security of students // UralInformTV. 2012. March 19.
The prosecutor's office of the city of Langepas revealed the access of students of an educational institution to sites with extremist materials // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra.
In Ney schools, content filters installed on computers do not guarantee a complete restriction of materials of an extremist nature. // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Kostroma Region. 2012. March 27.
Uglegorsk prosecutor's office demanded to restrict schoolchildren's access to extremist Internet resources // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Sakhalin Region. 2012. March 28.
Rossoshansk interdistrict prosecutor's office restricted students' access to extremist materials on the Internet // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Voronezh region. March 28, 2012
The prosecutor's office of the Saratov region conducted an inspection of compliance with legislation aimed at protecting the morality of children when using the Internet // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Saratov region. 2012. March 29.
The prosecutor's office revealed violations of the law in the field of countering extremist activity in an educational institution // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Bryansk region. 2012. April 4.
In an educational institution, on a computer with Internet access, upon request, the search engine gave out sites describing the narcotic effect of a substance that is part of the smoking mixture, as well as containing photographs of naked girls, information on methods for making explosive devices // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Saratov region. 2012. April 9.
Satka city prosecutor demanded to block school students' access to extremist Internet sites // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Chelyabinsk region. 2012. April 10.
The prosecutor's office of the Rivne region in educational institutions conducted an audit of compliance with legislation aimed at protecting the morality of children when using the Internet // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Saratov region. 2012. April 17.
In the Novosibirsk region, the prosecutor's office demanded in court that school principals exclude students' access to Internet resources containing information that is incompatible with the tasks of education and training // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Novosibirsk region. 2012. April 25.
The prosecutor's office of the republic on the protection of the rights of students from negative information // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Chechen Republic. 2012. April 27.
The prosecutor's office of the city of Pyatigorsk conducted an audit of the implementation of legislation on countering extremism in educational institutions of higher professional education // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Stavropol Territory. 2012. April 28.
The prosecutor's office demanded to restrict access to extremist materials on the Internet // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Chechen Republic. 2012. April 28.
In the wake of the prosecutor's check // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Lipetsk Region. 2012. May 2.
The prosecutor's office of the Arkhangelsk region summed up the results of the audit on compliance with the legislation on education // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Arkhangelsk region. 2012. May 4.
On the proposal of the prosecutor's office of the republic, violations of the legislation on education, on countering extremism and terrorism in the activities of the Gorno-Altai State University were eliminated // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Altai. 2012. May 16.
The prosecutor's office of the Dalnekonstantinovsky district revealed the fact of violation of the legislation on countering extremist activity in educational institutions of the district // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Nizhny Novgorod region. 2012. May 18.
In the library near Volgograd, schoolchildren had access to porn sites // AiF - Volgograd. 2012. May 23.
After the intervention of the prosecutor's office in 24 schools of the Poltava district of the Omsk region, access to sites that have a negative impact on adolescents is limited // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Omsk region. 2012. May 24.
Access of school computers to extremist information resources is limited in Tatarstan as a result of the intervention of the prosecutor's office // Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Tatarstan. 2012. May 24.
The prosecutor's office of the city of Verkhny Ufaley found free access to materials of extremist content in the computer classes of educational institutions // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Chelyabinsk region. 2012. May 31.
The prosecutor's office of the Sovetsky district of Volgograd conducted an audit of the implementation of the legislation by educational institutions in the field of implementation of the priority national project "Education", during which violations were revealed // Prosecutor's office of the Volgograd region. 2012. May 31.
The prosecutor, in order to protect the constitutional order, morality, health, rights and legitimate interests of citizens and the security of the state, requires restricting access to an Internet site containing prohibited information // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Samara Region. 2012. June 1.
Thanks to the intervention of the Nurlat city prosecutor's office, access of school computers to Internet resources of an extremist nature was stopped // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Tatarstan. 2012. June 1.
Protecting children from harmful information from the Internet // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Novgorod region. 2012. June 4.
The prosecutor's office stopped violations of the law on countering extremism in the activities of educational and cultural institutions // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Volgograd region. 2012. June 6.
The prosecutor's office of the Maloyaroslavetsky district demanded to eliminate the possibility of schoolchildren's access to prohibited Internet resources // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Kaluga Region. 2012. June 6.
About work in the field of countering extremist activity // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Sverdlovsk Region. 2012. June 15.
In rural schools, children could watch sites "for adults" // County town (Livny). 2012. June 20.
The prosecutor's office of the Zheleznodorozhny district of Barnaul conducted an inspection of compliance with the legislation on countering extremist activity // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Altai Territory. 2012. June 21.
Prosecutors Demand Restrict Schoolchildren's Access to Internet Sites Containing Extremist Information Materials // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Vologda region. 2012. June 21.
The prosecutor's office revealed violations of the law in the activities of schools // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Karelia. 2012. June 21.