So can Manezhka be repeated this Sunday? Hardly.
Firstly, the special services have time to play preemptively. Police
will be transferred to an enhanced mode, with the leaders of fan movements will
conversations. Secondly, and most importantly, Mirzaeva, most likely, today
will be taken into custody. The immediate cause will disappear. However
the “national theme” will remain, in one form or another it has not yet manifested itself
once. Because bans alone will not solve anything. It shows and
history with the banned DPNI.
- The ban does not mean that these people who fell under it have disappeared somewhere, - says the director of the information and analytical center "Sova". Alexander Verkhovsky,
- Those who were going to continue their activities moved to the organization
"Russians", having united with several similar organizations,
predominantly even more radical persuasion. And they certainly
will continue to operate. It's just summer now, it's not so noticeable.
The only undoubted effect that the DPNI ban had was this. Those,
who have not yet come to light as members of these publicly
organizations may not join them. But that doesn't mean that
they will refuse to do any activity at all, they will simply conduct it without
publicly.
Will the leadership of the organization "Russians" behave less ugly,
It is difficult to say what the leadership of the DPNI behaved in. Will they extract
any lesson? I'm not sure, because there the composition is even more
radical than it was.
"SP": - It turns out that the situation is still alarming?
- The situation has become better only in the sense that, thank God,
kill less. This is undeniable progress, but largely achieved
police pressure. However, the nationalist movement itself is nowhere
disappears because it is an expression of certain pretty
common mindsets that never go away.
"SP": - And how do you assess the regular disagreements within this movement?
- This is fine. After all, they, in fact, can’t agree on anything and can’t
necessary. If they, for example, had to go to the polls, then yes,
would have to unite, put up a single list. They don't even have one
tasks. They may have a task - to organize relatively massive
activities, for which some kind of unity is desirable. But the genre of their events
such that even this is not really required. Say, on the "Russian March" everything
everyone comes in a row, regardless of the organization. What else
carried out regularly? Some pickets. But they are very small. And there
at least one organization will be, at least three, the number of this is not particularly
will change. If there are twice as many organizers, then participants from
it won't double.
"SP": - Is it possible to speak of them as a serious political force?
- Not now. They are potentially a serious political force.
Now they just can’t turn to the layman in any way, it doesn’t work, but
without this, it is impossible to become a significant political force.
"SP": - And why is the dialogue not working?
- I think that style interferes, nationalism is still too
marginal. Since it all grew out of the skinhead environment, it is still
it is very felt. And to a simple citizen, even if he goes out of his way
does not like people from the Caucasus and in general everyone in the world, he does not care next to
These guys are weird. As soon as they have some
a group of people without these militants, then there are so few of them that it is impossible to
manages to connect anyone. That's just more moderate
nationalists held a rally under a potentially very popular slogan
"Stop feeding Caucasians." But even under this, it would seem, completely
a win-win slogan all the same, the people somehow did not pull themselves up. Maybe,
because people saw that the rally was not numerous, I don't know. This
some dead end for the nationalist movement.
"SP": - Maybe then it's not a movement at all, you can't call it that, too loud?
- There is no other word yet. In Western languages, in English, in
including using such a slightly strange term as "scene".
The ultra-right scene, the left scene, that is, the fusion of heterogeneous groups,
which do not form a full-fledged political sector, but a specific
Wednesday.
There are small movements, but this does not mean that they will be tomorrow
will remain so. Let's say the Narodnaya Volya were completely uninfluential
movement. Forever they failed, hopeless losers
could not increase their numbers in any way, at least kill yourself. And then from them
a huge party of Socialist-Revolutionaries grew up. It took several decades.
So it is with the national movement. Yes, now it is weak. But potentially it has
a large reserve of growth, because their ideas, it seems, should be used
support, judging by any polls, but they don’t use it. Will it succeed
them to overcome this barrier between themselves and the audience? In the near future,
obviously not. Today all this looks rather ridiculous, but in 10 years it may
turn out differently.
"SP": Is it worth it then to ban them, because new organizations immediately appear?
- The state should pursue activities that go beyond
admissible. After all, DPNI was banned not only for chatter. This signal is not
these people, no one hopes to re-educate them, but a signal to others. If you
want to create a nationalist organization, without scuffle,
Please. If someone finally succeeds, we will have
nationalist party. So far, no one has succeeded.
"SP": - In the nationalist movements there are fans of Hitler, how dangerous are they?
- As a rule, there are almost no literal followers of Hitler. Even
people who in Western Europe would be called neo-fascists, they are about Hitler
rarely remembered. But these people, who in any European
country would be considered neo-fascists, we have them in the nationalist movement, to
unfortunately the majority. And just the more moderate nationalists are
a clear minority in this environment. And the bulk is just
small groups that share strong racist attitudes,
are guided by the corresponding Western European samples. This
pretty sad.
Sources