
I'm crying. Tears of tenderness are welling into the eyes. I feel that the times predicted by the prophet Isaiah have come when the wolf and the lamb will graze together and the lion, like an ox, will eat straw. The golden age has come! Human rights activists and Putin for a bottle of Vincets are discussing issues of protecting human rights and the possibility of salvation of political prisoners. Or the impossibility of salvation. What, however, is the difference? The main thing is that in a relaxed atmosphere, during a friendly drinking, purely specifically in the presidential apartments.
What are you saying? Putin was elected in dishonest elections? Are political prisoners sitting in the country? What difference does it make if there is an opportunity to scan the tail in front of a good -minded owner! Again, you can talk about the political prizes. In ritual, so to speak, goals. He said something about the Politzks, and everything seems to be in order-there is an excuse. True, there is no sense, but it is not designed for this.
No, I understand Vladimir Lukin and Mikhail Fedotov, not to mention Vyacheslav Volodin - their court position obliges. Even Lyudmila Alekseeva understands who, besides Putin, will pour a glass of wine on a freebie, so sincerely and humanly thank her as "one of the oldest fighters on this front-our colleague to Mrs. Alekseev." Good colleagues! However, they graze together.
Putin thanked those who took part in the preparation of the Constitution, which he now violates with such pleasure. Human rights activists Alekseev, Brod, Gannushkin, Kabanov, Hefter, Kostin, Pampilov, Kucheen and others (total 33 people) were listened and not assigned. We talked a little about the upcoming amnesty. It turned out that Putin imagines her differently than human rights activists, but in general everyone was satisfied. True, it is unlikely that anyone will be freed from the Politicals, but is that the point? The main thing is to speak out louder, and then with the consciousness of the fulfillment of the duty to appear before the radiant eyes, realize your state significance and hear the highest praise. The affectionate word and human rights activist are pleasant.
For the opportunity to joyfully freeze in Novo-Ogarev, the human rights activists had to unreasonably demolish numerous Putin revelations. The fact that "we must respect the right of other people to freedom." The fact that social rights are no less important than political. The fact that "in power and the human rights movement has absolutely the same tasks." But Putin’s reminder of the price of loyalty of the audience was the most delightful: “Perhaps it should also be added that - and you also know this well - we three times more than three times increased by financial support to non -profit organizations. A significant part of the funds - 250 million, if my memory serves me, went to support the human rights activists working in the political sphere, out of 3.2 billion rubles. They organized in such a way as you yourself suggested ... I hope that you are satisfied with how this work was built. "
Human rights activists, of course, were satisfied. They were modestly silent, for they remembered that they graze on the same field with the authorities and chew the common straw of one state nursery. All of them, from the ICG Lyudmila Alekseeva to the editorial office of Pioneer Pravda, receive generous government grants from the state budget (those who wish can admire the seven -digit amounts allocated by the dedicated human rights defenders ). So you have to silently listen to the owner and show a sense of deep and complete satisfaction.
After a friendly booze with the president in Novo-Ogarev, part of the human rights activists went to Moscow to hand each other awards on the occasion of the Human Rights Day. The head of the Moscow Helsinki group Lyudmila Alekseeva arrived at the Sakharov Center with her colleague , deputy head of the Kremlin administration, a member of the General Council of the United Russia party Vyacheslav Volodin. Here the fraternity continued at a lower level.
If someone thinks that the Golden Age defeated one individual country, then he is mistaken. This is a towing. On the same day, December 10, President Obama at the funeral of former communist Nelson Mandela in an unofficial situation shook the hand of the current communist Raul Castro. So the question is: if the president of the most influential democracy in the world is allowed to hide with the Cuban dictator, then why would our human rights defenders in law enforcement with the false president of Russia?