Consultations on the topic “It's time to expand repressions and terror in Russia” are in demand
In the evening, looking at the TV screen, the conceited Akopyan will exclaim joyfully: “Here it is, real glory!”
Eduard Limonov. "In captivity with the dead"
Once, political consultant Artyom Akopyan [ 1 ] wrote: “Perhaps any person who is seriously claiming to connect his life with political sciences, is forced to develop a small bit of schizophrenia in himself. Controlled and controlled bifurcation of personality. " [ 2 ] It is difficult to say how much it is controlled and controlled. Moreover, it is difficult, observing from the side, to determine how small this bit of schizophrenia is. Sometimes it seems that she is not so small. But there is no doubt that Artyom Akopyan by name knows exactly his main enemy, and this enemy is liberal. A collective image with a small letter. Therefore, he wrote: "Little liberal has long settled in my head and lives." [ 3 ]
"The only crime against humanity is liberal beliefs"
| | | --- | | 
Artyom Akopyan is capable of a lot. He, like an amateur gardener, grows a liberal in his head. The flower every time increases ugly, badly smelling (Dutch?). Of course, Mr. Akopyan wants to immediately destroy it, tearing it out. And he successfully destroys him. However, a new day occurs, and the process of fertilizer and cultivation occurs again. Otherwise, it is impossible. After all, Artyom Akopyan "seriously claims to connect his life with political sciences." Serious political science requires self -sacrifice.
The political consultant does not spare himself and again and again lets the liberal parasitus into his head. Judging by his publications, this happens so often that it becomes scary for the victim of political science. Will the body withstand? In addition, there is a suspicion that the liberal seeds of Artyom Akopyan are often slipped by poor-quality (Chinese?), And not a liberal grows in his head, but some kind of mutant like those found in Alexander Prokhanov’s novels. Such mutants are easy to hate. They are so disgusting that it seems that it is a sin not to destroy them. He gave rise to his personal liberal, he will kill him. What is his demand?
Mr. Akopyan, unfortunately, writes in poor Russian, but this does not interfere with the understanding of its texts, especially since the main idea is unpretentious: “The only crime against humanity is liberal beliefs. The carrier of these are the zombies, it must be destroyed without pity, as soon as you identify. No liberal - there is no problem. If the liberal has children, then even more so, it is necessary to free children from the influence of this scum. ” [ 4 ]
In my head, unlike the head of Mr. Akopyan, the liberal does not take root. Even a small one. Liberals usually consider freedom to be the main value, and this is quite strange. [ 5 ] More precisely, very often people who call themselves liberals emphasize that “not a person for the state is a state for humans,” and you immediately agree with this. But then many liberals suddenly begin to deify this very freedom. The cult of a certain freedom, the cult of self -expression is created. And this is another extreme. Self -expression is too comprehensive concept to consider its value. In this case, Strelkov-Girkin can also be recognized as a liberal. [ 6 ] He freely moves around a foreign country, issues orders and generally behaves quite freely, not thinking too much about compliance with Russian or Ukrainian laws. In short, it expresses itself.
And yet, despite my very cautious attitude to those who are customary in Russia to be considered liberals, it should be said: to consider liberal beliefs the only crime before humanity is somehow too much.
“The problem of the“ fifth of the column ”raised by the president is not as simple as it seems at first glance and no matter how much I would like, but it is hardly possible to solve it with the help of a grandfather’s“ Mauser ”,” Artyom Akopyan, who works as a political consultant in the team of the acting governor of the Pskov region Andrei Turchak [ 7 ] recently wrote it.
In other words, the perspicacious Artyom Akopyan guesses that he is unlikely to be shot from the “Mauser” of liberals. Maybe because there are not enough cartridges? Although he has his own version: “I am already 37 years old, late to retrained from political consultants to mass killers. But I try to be a useful homeland as much as my strength. "
Nevertheless, a bright dream does not leave him. “We have two components of the correct policy of the three - the Olympics and the Crimea,” says Artyom Akopyan. - It's time to pay attention inward, it is high time to expand repressions and terror. And I'm not joking a drop, let's already arrange the nits for a long time, the 37th year! ”
Mr. Akopyan is impatient. He needs mass terror. And he does not intend to wait for 2037. It seems that he is not embarrassed that many executioners in the thirties in the USSR survived their victims for a short time. As already mentioned, Artyom Akopyan is not alien to the idea of self -sacrifice.
I remember one hockey player - the Olympic champion - last year I was convinced that Russia urgently needed Beria. [ 8 ] not for long, only six months. The thirst for executions did not give the Olympic champion of peace. It didn’t work out with landings, so, maybe at least executions will help?
That is, it is not necessary to be a political consultant of the uninstall in order to dream of terror. You can be a simple Olympic champion.
"When I come to power, people will be planted for one thought ..."
In July 2014, the precious consultant wrote: “When I come to power, people will be planted for one thought that there is something interesting outside of Russia in the world.”
While Mr. Akopyan did not come to power, readers have a little time to think that the light of the wedge in Russia did not meet and there is also something interesting outside of Russia.
But do not rush to think not about Russia. We open the first page of Facebook of the same Artyom Akopyan and read: “Interests: sammy davis jr., Pat Boone. Favorites: Pi Jay Probi, Frankie Lane, Larry Clinton. " All. In general, as Pj Proby sang: "I'll Go Crazy."
It seems that this political consultant really has a split. The interests of Mr. Akopyan are concentrated on the work of the singers Sammy Davis Jr. and Pat Bun, but for one thought that there is something interesting in the world outside of Russia, he is ready to plant.
Andrei Turchak said something similar in spirit last year, when it became known about his real estate in Nice. Then the governor pronounced the historical phrase: "The official cannot defend the interests of the state if he is burdened with assets beyond its borders." [ 9 ]
There are words for internal use, but there is - for external. Some words are pronounced on Friday, others on Saturday. And these can be different words that completely contradict each other.
Russian "patriots" also have a weekend. And then the time comes for the old man Pi Jay Probi or for walking along the Nice embankment.
The history of the publications of Artyom Akopyan is only a special case of what is happening among those who, in the zero years at a relatively young age, leaned against power: Artyom Akopyan, Konstantin Rykov, Eduard Bagirov ...
With all the differences in the biography, they have a lot in common, and this is in common - not only the support of Vladimir Putin. Does anyone support him? But not everyone is so aggressive.
All these circles named and some unnamed people are characterized not only by rejection of other people's ideas, but also by an undisguised desire to destroy opponents physically. Do not argue, but erase from the face of the earth. Methods for this are offered different, but this is presented with an indispensable frenzy - a sign of internal uncertainty.
It is clear that in our time no one for calls for murder, including mass murder, will not be punished. Unless, of course, these words are not pronounced by liberals (but they, as a rule, do not pronounce them).
The most famous case that occurred with the writer Eduard Bagirov refers to the distant 2010, when Bagirov, who later became a confidant of Vladimir Putin, wrote on his own behalf of St. Petersburg: “I hate this / ... bydologized by all fibers of the soul ... I would burn with my own hands. Alive. Or another blockade would have arranged one, so that again, instead of bread, the casein glue and the lime from the walls were gnawed. Animals. Animals…". [10] This is not the liberal television channel "Rain" with his survey about the Leningrad blockade.
Then another written statement of this writer regarding the journalist Yulia Latynina was violently discussed: "Can order her to be shot at the entrance as a political?" Bagirov’s readers seemed little to the readers of this question, and they developed the topic: “I propose a flash mob“ but to order ... ”” Bagirov’s fans tried to show wit, but it was a special kind and basically concerned different ways of killing: “It was not necessary to shoot it, but it was necessary to burn it on the stake in the presence of exorcists.”
Usually in such cases, as if justifying the writing, they say: “These are only words. I would like to really kill, I would not have made any statements. ”
True, Bagirov nevertheless then put into the explanation: “Now the main thing: about the content of the text, which so voluptuously sucks Latynin. This was written on the UDAFF.com website in 2004, when the Internet was completely anonymous, and it was written by no author of Putin and not even the writer Eduard Bagirov, but by the nameless network hooligan nicknamed the Sphinx. ” This Sphinx was so similar to Eduard Bagirov that few could find more than one difference between Sphinx and Bagirov.
The rhetoric of people like Bagirov and Akopyan is very monotonous. I remember about the leader of the rock group "Alice" Konstantin Kinchev Bagirov spoke like this: “The crazy gorilla and the drug addict Kinchev. As long as he died. Sorry, between us. Shame of Russia ”[ 11 ].
But what, signing his photo with Anatoly Karpov, was written by Artyom Akopyan, referring to the ex-champion of the world in chess Harry Kasparov: “With the great Soviet chess player Anatoly Evgenievich Karpov. His confrontation with the demoniac monkey was the backdrop of the destruction of my state and was fully used in the information struggle by our enemies. We, fools, did not understand this, and the monkey now lives on Manhattan and continues to crap. He talked with him and even drank vodka. (And not even one duty glass). Our man in every sense! "
No matter what views of the ex-champions of the world in chess of Kasparov and Karpov are shared, but when the Russian authorities arrested Harry Kasparov for five days, the first to visit the arrested was Anatoly Karpov. Why came-Mr. Akopyan, apparently, does not understand this.
I suspect that Karpov never spoke about his strongest opponent who took the title of world champion from him as a “Baku monkey”. These are words from a vocabulary of completely different people who are used to manipulating and who do not know the price of the word (not to be confused with prices for fees).
"Now we need to destroy this misunderstanding of exception"
I would not call these people ideological. Of course, they can dream of Stalin and hate their real and imaginary enemies, but they do not become ideological. The same Artyom Akopyan spoke about this frankly: “As for the right-left levy. Beat the rich until they win, and beat the poor, until they get rich. That's my whole position in relation to economics, property, socialism-capitalism, etc. ” [ 12 ] If there is some idea here, then it consists in three letters: hit. That's the whole idea. Bay-Bogi party. Hence such a love for the term "wrecking". After all, it is necessary for some justification when the time comes for real. And it will come when it will be possible to beat, and it will no longer be necessary to run from the scene of the crime.
By 2014, people like Akopyan finally felt that they were on their feet firmly. Their time has come.
When the publicist Vitaly Rose wrote about “the messengers of Satan from anti -Russian” [ 13 ], it was clear that this person would not worry too much that the “anti -Russian” passenger plane with three hundred civilians was shot down in the sky above the Donetsk region. But Artyom Akopyan is even more frank: "Well, it is clear that the lives of those who fight below are much more important than all Europeans combined." [ 14 ]
So, the life of Strelkov-Girkin and other "militias", according to political consultant Akopyan, "is much more important than all Europeans combined." There are "superman", but there are so ... people. And the kids of people. The third variety is “Nerusi!”, As fans of the Great Lucian poet Andrei Komneshchikov shouted heartily at one of the meetings with readers, revealing a little Gagauz blood among the surrounding people. It seems that Mr. Akopyan argues in the same way: there are “correct” peoples, but there are degraded. The latter are not sorry.
But if the passengers of the Malaysian Boeing, most likely, were beaten by mistake, then in desperate dreams of Mr. Akopyan, purposefulness is traced. He does not like the Germans, and he, not the most outstanding political consultant, is not going to hide it, revealing his plans: “Bitches, gloomy German gays. Now we need to destroy this misunderstanding without exception so that the Teutonic spirit and German rage are not disgraced. ” [ 15 ]
Artyom Akopyan writes this with such frenzy that there is no doubt to whom the "Teutonic spirit and German rage" have engaged in. In Artyom Akopyan, and at the same time in Andronika Migranyan with his statement about “good Hitler until 1939”, [ 16 ] in Sergei Kurginyan with all his statements, in Konstantin Rykov (with a post on Twitter: “Remember! You work on the State Department! You will not be mercy! .. I will count the cartridges. A person of 30 liberals! Glory to Russia ”[ 17 ]), in another political consultant Alexander Boroday ... There are many such“ Teutons ”in the vastness of Russia and Ukraine today.
30 killed liberals are significant. About the same (but only children) as the hero of the poem “Russian Shahid” Andrei Kamovshchikov, a laureate of the Prize of the Administration of the Pskov Region, editor of the Great Lucian Pravda, gathered to take into the next world. The poem is dedicated to the Russian terrorist who is preparing to blow up the school bus. Immediately after the public reading of this poem, three years ago, I asked Mr. Klevshchikov: “Your lyrical hero is a Russian marty. He wants to destroy children in a school bus. Do you yourself sympathize with the Russian Shahid or condemn it? " “A person has the right to such a reaction, I would say so,” Andrei Skavshchikov answered calmly.
I will come to some of your teahouse
And Muslim meat I spray the tables
Or in a school bus bomb torn
In the center of the seething day khankala.
“Muslim meat” caused a special approval in part of the Pskov fans of Andrei Kamshchikov.
But the most stormy personal delight at that meeting, held in 2011, was expressed by the many years of the Pskov regional branch of the Russian Writers, Alexander Bologov, who was violently applauding Andrei Kamsovshchikov’s poem “Head of the Mtsensk Cheka”. It ends with the words: “There are more red guardsmen to us, // Chiefs of the Mtsensk Cheka!”
The poetic dream of the resumption of mass terror was expressed unequivocally:
Or maybe otherwise we can’t,
Or maybe just lie?
Or maybe the people are a monkey,
What needs to be trained? [ 18 ]
The fact that the people-a monkey (or some other animal) in need of training, often reason today. When you look at your or alien people down, then there is a tempting desire for simple decisions up to the execution of objectionable ones. It’s a pity for people, but not monkeys.
A little later, Alexander Bologov explained how the Chekists were especially close to him, who sought to "raise the whole world on his hind legs." “At the head of the Mtsensk Cheka was my grandfather,” Alexander Bologov admitted with pleasure.
Many other works of Andrei Komnashchikov are just as specific and inviting: “To the ax!”, “I and Beria”, “laces”, “Stalin”, “Direct, creature!”, “Bloody” ... “Laces” are dedicated to Russian skinheads (white shoelaces Skinheads eat into their shoes as a sign of the fact that they killed non -Russian).
No, such an author could not help but get a premium of the administration of the Pskov region from the hands of Andrei Turchak. And repeatedly.
In a desperate column, Son, Sons,
My decrepit life is at least for something suitable.
I am red in boots red shoelaces,
Because the white blood is very visible.
You can not look closely. Neither Artyom Akopyan, nor his employer Andrei Tourchak in ordinary life, red or white laces with black shoes do not wear. They did not deserve them. They did not kill anyone. But they, apparently, were made to create their feasible contribution to the creation of the atmosphere of hatred.
"So a week before the arrest, I found out that Akopyan is a provocateur"
Before the appearance surrounded by Andrei Turchak, the most loud story associated with Artyom Akopyan concerned the arrest in Eduard Limonov in the early zero years. In the book “In captivity with the dead,” Limonov wrote: “So a week before the arrest, I found out that the Akopyan is a provocateur. The FSB man in the “Party leadership”, who, after eight days, will boast of in front of me in the Volga, rushing from Gorno-Altaysk to Barnaul, Lieutenant Colonel of Kuznetsov. ”
There is a stable version that it was the National Bolshevik Akopyan who testified against his leader Limonov, after which Limonov and his associates were convicted by the Saratov court (“The defendant claimed that the testimony of the main witness of the prosecution, a former NBP member Artem Akopyan, who previously confirmed in court that Limonov, along with his“ associates ”prepared an armed forces invasion of Kazakhstan, do not correspond to reality ”[ 19 ]).
Of course, Artyom Akopyan himself in his text “How I made a revolution in Kazakhstan” denies this. His version is as follows: “I certainly went against Limonov. I tried to take his party from him while he was sitting in Lefortovo. I organized the Antilimon group in the NBP. Мои в общем совершенно невинные показания фэсээбешники умело использовали и запугали с их помощью сторону защиты так, что адвокаты полностью сосредоточились на отбивке суровых статей и не смогли вывести Лимонова из эпизодов, связанных с покупкой оружия. Жалею ли я о том, что так произошло? Нет не жалею…»
И всё-таки с подачи Эдуарда Лимонова к Артёму Акопяну надолго приклеилось прозвище «Иуда-Акопян».
«Теперь о личности Иуды Акопяна, - написал Лимонов в книге «В плену у мертвецов». - Быстрый, остроумный, быстро схватывающий юноша. Любящий себя и своё тело. Каждое утро ходил голым обливаться с ведром к ледяному ручью. Высокомерен очень. С презрением относился к своим товарищам... Чистый, остриженный, разрушительно остроумный, творчески бесплодный».
Лимонов утверждал, что Акопян, продав партийный УАЗ, деньги пропил. Не забыл он рассказать и о том, как слегка задел Акопяна рукой: «На вокзале в Барнауле между Акопяном и мной произошла ссора. Мы зашли в соседний автовокзал, где уселись поесть в кафе. При ссоре присутствовали Шилин, Аксёнов и Шаргунов. Акопян сообщил, что в октябре здесь, в Барнауле, помимо тех денег, которые я ему высылал, он растратил ещё деньги, и теперь я должен выплатить эти деньги Абрамкину, у которого он эти деньги занял. Я накричал на Акопяна, назвал его «курортником», «говнюком», «нахлебником» и дал ему по лицу. Пощёчину. Он давно меня раздражал, этот случайный в партии человек…. Наглец».
Сложно сказать, насколько случаен был Акопян в партии национал-большевиков, но в партии «Единая Россия» он точно человек неслучайный. Более того, он последователен и принципам своим не изменяет. Раньше, когда был нацболом, кричал «Сталин, Берия, ГУЛаг!» и теперь, сделавшись единороссом, продолжает придерживаться тех же взглядов.
* * *
Да, и самое главное. Г-н Акопян, если ему верить, ненавидит не только либералов. «Когда я вижу футболиста, меня блевать тянет», - написал он. Страшно представить, что же станет с Артёмом Акопяном, если ему случайно попадётся футболист-либерал (бывают, наверное, и такие).
И ещё надо учитывать, что люди, подобные Артёму Акопяну, тоже у некоторой части всё ещё живых людей вызывают рвотный рефлекс. Политтехнология – грязное дело, особенно если политконсультант живо интересуется технологией репрессий и террора.
Alexey Semenov
Политконсультант, публицист. Родился в Ленинграде в 1977 году.
См.: А. Акопян. Ограниченно рукопожатные. Как предать Родину, если ты националист // odnako.org, блог.
There.
См.: facebook.com/people/Артем-Акопян. 29.07.2014. Авторская орфография и пунктуация здесь и далее сохранены.
Либерализм (от лат. liberalis — свободный) — философское и общественно-политическое течение, провозглашающее незыблемость прав и индивидуальных свобод человека, выступающее за минимизацию вмешательства государства в жизнь людей.
See: A. Semenov. Сказки старой липы // «ПГ», № 28 (700) от 16-22 июля 2014 г.
Лидер партии «ЯБЛОКО» Сергей Митрохин направил главе Следственного комитета РФ Александру Бастрыкину заявление о преступлении, совершённом политтехнологом врио губернатора Псковской области Андрея Турчака Артемом Акопяном. На своей странице в Facebook Акопян призывал к уничтожению либералов, евреев и немцев. После резонанса в Интернете Акопян удалил свою страницу в соцсети. Однако у пользователей остались многочисленные скриншоты.
See: A. Semenov. Политика со льдом // «ПГ», № 12 (634) от 27 марта - 2 апреля 2013 г.
See: A. Semenov. «О, этот юг, о, эта Ницца…» // «ПГ», № 10 (632) от 13-19 марта 2013 г.
See: A. Semenov. Under any pretext // "PG", No. 5 (677) dated February 5-11, 2014
See: A. Semenov. Стол заказов // «ПГ», № 25 (597) от 27 июня - 3 июля 2012 г.
См.: facebook.com/people/Артем-Акопян. 19.07.2014.
See: A. Semenov. Сказка Старой Липы // «ПГ», № 28 (700) от 16-22 июля 2014 г.
18.07. 2014
См.: facebook.com/people/Артем-Акопян.27.07.2014 г.
See: A. Semenov. Game of fascists // "PG", No. 14 (686) dated April 9-15, 2014
See: A. Semenov. Политический словарь. Protest, or birth certificate // "PG", No. 6 (578) dated February 15-21, 2012
See: A. Semenov. Атаман Великих Лук // «Псковская правда» от 1.03.2011 г.
См.: Эдуард Лимонов не признал себя виновным ни по одной из статей обвинения // newsru.com, 4.12.2002 г.