In March 2008, Rosobrazovanie (later abolished and reorganized into the Ministry of Education and Science) provided all Russian schools with licensed software packages, which include a content filtering program for Internet access. As it turned out, this program does not cope with the task, which was found out as a result of prosecutorial checks throughout the country. It is quite obvious that the fault for the fact that schoolchildren, despite access filters, have the opportunity to visit neo-Nazi and other inappropriate sites from school computers, lies not only with schools that do not update software with the necessary regularity, but also with the Ministry of Education and Science, which has installed an insufficiently effective product. Note that not all items of the Federal List of Extremist Materials are designed in such a way that they can be used as a guide to action (sometimes, when it comes to a website, its address may not be displayed completely or even completely absent, and the titles of books and articles are given no output).
In addition, we cannot fail to note that the very idea of fighting extremism in schools with the help of filters seems wrong to us. Firstly, any filter can be bypassed if desired, and secondly, it is in principle impossible to compile an exhaustive list of addresses and keywords.
However, prosecutors everywhere and regularly punish local officials and school leaders for this. We believe that the Ministry of Education and Science should be responsible for the imperfection of the content filtering system, and the negligence of the leadership of schools that do not update the program is a problem of labor discipline rather than law enforcement. Similarly, we treat the claims of prosecutors to the leadership of educational institutions regarding access to resources from the Unified Register of Prohibited Sites - in cases where it is known that a school or university is trying to stop this access.
We have combined such cases into a single list, the first part of which covers the period from December 2009 to June 2011, the second part - from July 2011 to June 2012, the third part - from June 2012 to November 2013, and the fourth part - from November 2013 to the end of 2014. The continuation of this list is in front of you.
On December 30, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Novosibirsk region reported that in 2015 the prosecutor's office of the Pervomaisky district of Novosibirsk, during an audit, established that it was possible to listen to audio recordings included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials in "online mode" from the computers of one of the district's schools. The principal of the school was presented with a proposal to eliminate violations of the law. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On December 28, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Primorsky Territory reported that the Prosecutor's Office of the Khasansky District of Primorye had filed a motion to eliminate violations of the law on countering extremism against the director of a private educational institution. The reason was that the content filtering system installed on school computers did not fully cope with the task. As a result, one official was disciplined and a new content filtering program was installed on computers.
On December 23, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Saratov Region reported that the Samoilovsky District Prosecutor's Court ordered six schools to ensure the proper operation of the content filtering system software. The reason was the materials of the check, during which the prosecutor's office found that the recognized extremist book "Removal of Doubts" was available from the computers of the schools.
On December 17, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Soviet administrative district of Omsk filed a lawsuit with a demand to eliminate violations of anti-terrorism legislation at Omsk State University (OmGU). The department reported that in the spring and summer of 2015, it had already submitted relevant submissions to the leadership of the university. The university responded, in particular, that it had taken measures to block access from its territory to sites with prohibited information included in the register of Roskomnadzor. However, in the fall, the prosecutor's office found that it was still possible to access sites from the registry from one of the university's buildings.
On November 27, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Tver region reported that the prosecutors of various districts of Tver and the region, as a result of an inspection in educational institutions for compliance with the requirements of the legislation on countering terrorism and extremism, made 70 submissions to eliminate violations, as a result of which 17 officials were brought to trial. disciplinary liability, sent to the court 25 statements of claim. Part of the response acts was issued due to the fact that the prosecutors of the Proletarsky and Central district of Tver, as well as the Kuvshinovsky, Sandovsky, Toropetsky, Firovsky districts of the region, the Konakovo interdistrict prosecutor found that the content filters installed on school computers were not fully restricted access to extremist information.
On November 16, 2015, it became known about the submission on the elimination of violations of the law on countering extremist activity, which was submitted by the prosecutor's office of the Toropetsky district of the Tver region to the director of the Skvortsovskaya school. During the audit, the agency found that it was possible from school computers to access sites containing information that is harmful to the mental and moral development of minors. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
October 9, 2015, the prosecutor's office of ZATO Snezhinsk, Chelyabinsk Region, announced a lawsuit to the Snezhinsky City Court against the leadership of school No. On the necessary information filtering ", and install licensed content filters. Until the execution of the latest claim, access to the Internet at the school is blocked. In addition, the prosecutor's office made seven submissions on the elimination of violations of the law on countering extremist activity, including to the director of school No. 135 and the head of the city education department.
On September 9, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Kirov region reported that the prosecutor of the Bogorodsky district filed a lawsuit against the administration of two schools in the district, demanding that an effective content filtering system be installed on school computers. The reason was that the existing content filters did not fully cope with the task. The demands of the prosecutor's office were satisfied on a voluntary basis.
On August 24, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Komi reported that in the first half of 2015, submissions were made to eliminate violations of the law against the heads of school No. 5 in the city of Inta and the Glotovskaya secondary school of the Udora district. The reason was that the content filters installed on school computers did not completely exclude access to extremist materials.
On August 18, 2015, it became known about five submissions made to the heads of educational institutions in Rybinsk and the Rybinsk district of the Yaroslavl region, made by the prosecutor's office of the Rybinsk district of the Yaroslavl region. The reason for the sanctions was that students had access to extremist information from the computers of these educational institutions. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that they would otherwise be indicated as absent.
On August 17, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Tambov region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Muchkapsky district issued warnings in connection with the violation of the law on combating extremist activities against the heads of five branches of the MBOU Muchkapskaya secondary school due to the fact that the content filters installed on school computers did not fully cope with task.
On August 7, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Batyrevsky district of the Chuvash Republic announced the submissions to the directors of two district schools to eliminate violations of the law. The reason for the sanctions was that the content filters installed on the computers in the computer science classrooms were “out of order” and gave access to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On July 22, 2015, it became known about the submissions made by the prosecutor's office of Noyabrsk (Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District) to the principals of two schools in the city, as well as j submissions made to the principals of school No. 1 in the village of Pangoda, Staronadymskaya school and school No. 4 of Nadym Nenets Autonomous Okrug). The reason for the sanctions in Noyabrsk was that school computers had access to the websites of the "Right Sector", recognized in Russia as an extremist organization. In Nadym, school leaders were also punished for accessing banned, including extremist, websites from school computers. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would have indicated their absence.
On July 21, 2015, it became known about the submission made by the Ussuriysk city prosecutor's office to the director of the CBS of Ussuriysk. The reason for the sanction was that content filters were not installed on computers installed in 14 city libraries, which allowed minors to access prohibited information. The episode is included in our selection because the claims here are identical to the usual claims against schools. In addition, libraries are not educational institutions and are not included in the program for the mandatory installation of content filtering systems.
On July 2, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Novosibirsk region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Kalininsky district of Novosibirsk had submitted submissions to eliminate violations of the law against the directors of two local schools due to the fact that school employees did not ensure the restriction of schoolchildren's access to sites "which host a recognized by a court decision extremist material of the ideologists of fascism" . The submissions were satisfied, access to the relevant sites was closed, and four school employees were brought to disciplinary responsibility.
On June 29, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Zakharovsky district of the Ryazan region announced the submissions made to the directors of the Zakharovskaya secondary school No. 1 and the Zakharovskaya secondary school No. 2. The reason for the sanctions was that the content filters installed on school computers "did not fully" provide protection from banned, including extremist, sites.
On June 26, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of Yoshkar-Ola (Mari-El) made submissions to the directors of 11 schools in the city. In computer science classrooms, 10 of them did not have restricted access to prohibited sites. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would have indicated their absence.
On June 25, 2015, it became known about a lawsuit on imposing on an educational organization the obligation to ensure the proper operation of the content filtering system, filed in court by the prosecutor's office of the Pitersky district of the Saratov region. The claim was satisfied in full. The reason for the response was that in one of the district schools, despite content filters installed on computers, there was access to A. Hitler's Mein Kampf and W. Powell's Anarchist Cookbook, included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On June 24, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Yutazinsky district of the Republic of Tatarstan reported on the submissions made to the directors of the Karakashlinskaya, Malo-Urussinsky and Staro-Urussinsky district schools. The reason for the sanctions was that the content filters installed on school computers “did not fully” provide protection from prohibited, including extremist, information.
On June 23, 2015, the Vyshnevolotsk inter-district prosecutor's office of the Tver region announced the submission made to the director of the Vyshnevolotsk College. The reason for the sanction was, in particular, the fact that, despite the content filter installed on the college computers, students had access to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On June 18, 2015, it became known about four submissions of violations of the law submitted by the Nelidovo Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of the Tver Region to school principals in the city of Nelidovo, Tver Region. Submissions are reviewed and approved. The reason for the sanctions was that the content filtering system installed in the computer rooms of schools did not restrict access to prohibited, including extremist, information.
On June 11, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Mordovia submitted a proposal to eliminate violations of the law, acting. Minister of Education of the Republic of Mordovia. The reason for the sanction was, in particular, the fact that in a number of schools of the republic is not " fully students' access to prohibited, including extremist, materials on the Internet " blocked. The number of violations is not reported.
On June 9, 2015, it became known that, at the suit of the prosecutor's office of the Todzhinsky district of the Republic of Tyva, she reported that the directors of rural schools in the villages of Toora-Khem, Ii and Adyr-Kezhig, as well as a vocational school in the village of Toora-Khem (Republic of Tyva) were found guilty under part 2 of Art . 1 st. 6.17 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violation of the established requirements for the distribution among children of information products containing information that is harmful to their health and (or) development) and were fined 5 thousand rubles each. It was considered an offense that the content filters installed on computers in these educational institutions did not block access to materials recognized as extremist, in particular, to Mussolini's book The Doctrine of Fascism.
On June 4, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Lipetsk region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Lebedyansky district had made submissions to eliminate violations of the law against the head of the district education department and the heads of the school in the village of Olkhovets and school No. 3 in the city of Lebedyan. As a result, 4 officials were brought to disciplinary responsibility. The reason was that the content filtering programs installed on school computers were not updated in a timely manner and did not fully cope with the task.
On June 3, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Kaluga region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Sukhinichsky district made nine submissions to the heads of district educational institutions and the head of the education department of the district administration, 17 officials were brought to disciplinary responsibility. The reason was, in particular, that access to extremist materials was possible from school computers (obviously, content filters did not fully cope with the task).
On June 2, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Kostroma Region reported that computers installed in a number of schools had access to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The nature of the sanctions for this violation and their exact number are not specified.
On June 2, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of Chelyabinsk found access to sites with prohibited, including extremist, materials in four schools in the Kurchatovsky district of Chelyabinsk, which was possible despite the presence of content filtering on computers. The nature of the response was not reported.
On June 1, 2015, it became known about the submission made by the transport prosecutor's office of the Krasnodar Territory to the leadership of the Yeysk Marine Fishing Technical School - a branch of the Astrakhan State Technical University. The reason for the sanction was, in particular, the fact that the content filters installed on the computers of the educational institution " are not able to fully restrict access " to prohibited information, including extremist information.
On June 1, 2015, it became known that the Gubkin Prosecutor's Office of the Belgorod Region revealed access to Internet materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials at the Trinity School. The nature of the sanction is not specified. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would have indicated their absence.
On June 1, 2015, it became known about the submissions that the prosecutor's office of Blagoveshchensk, Amur Region, made to the directors of Blagoveshchensk schools No. 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 25. The reason for the sanctions was that the content filtering systems " not fully " limited access to prohibited, including extremist, information. According to the prosecutor's office, the violations have been eliminated.
On May 28, 2015, it became known that the Sosnogorsk Transport Prosecutor's Office of the Komi Republic submitted a proposal to eliminate violations of the law to the director of the Ukhta College of Railway Transport. The reason was that the content filtering system installed on the computers of the technical school did not fully cope with the task. The submission was satisfied, the responsible person was subjected to disciplinary action.
On May 27, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Altai reported that the prosecutor's office of the Chemalsky district had made submissions to the heads of six educational institutions in the district. The reason was, in particular, that the content filtering system installed on school computers did not fully restrict access to prohibited information. The submissions were satisfied, 16 officials were brought to disciplinary responsibility.
On May 21, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Orenburg region reported that the prosecutor of the Perevolotsk district sent a request to the head of the education department of the district administration to update the content filters installed on the computers of several rural schools, since the filters did not fully cope with the task.
On May 15, 2015, it became known about the submission that the prosecutor's office of the Vygonichsky district of the Bryansk region made to the director of the Vygonichsky school named after. Pavel Zaitsev. The reason for the sanctions was that school computers had access to the site with the books "Guide for Youth" by Said Nursi and "The Doctrine of Fascism" by Benito Mussolini, included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence. In addition, we recall that we consider the ban on Nursi's books unlawful.
On May 13, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Tula region reported that checks had been found in Pervomaiskaya and Yasenkovskaya schools in the Arsenevsky district, MBOU Bolotskaya and Bobrikovskaya schools in the Belevsky district, Dubenskaya school, Bolokhovskaya school No. 2 in the Kireevsky district, school No. 19 in Novomoskovsk, Kurkinskaya school No. 2, Shakhovskaya Mikhailovskaya, Griboyedovskaya, Ivanovskaya schools of the Kurkinsky district, school No. 30 of the Uzlovsky district, Chernskinskaya school No. 1 and Burakovskaya school of the Yasnogorsky district, as well as in lyceum No. 1 and school No. 1 of Shchekino, access from school computers to prohibited, including extremist, materials. At the same time, it is known that content filters were installed in all educational institutions, but they did not cope with their task. The number of sanctions and their nature is not specified.
On May 13, 2015, the Prosecutor’s Office of the Ryazan Region reported that in a number of schools in the Starozhilovsky, Spassky, Sapozhkovsky, Rybnovsky and Sasovsky districts of the Ryazan Region, computers installed in computer science classrooms had access to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The number of schools and the nature of the sanctions were not reported. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On May 13, 2015, it became known about the submissions that the prosecutor's office of Karabash of the Chelyabinsk region made to the directors of school No. 6 of Karabash and the Karabash branch of the Kasli Industrial and Humanitarian College. The reason for the sanctions was, in particular, the fact that the content filters installed on the computers of these educational institutions do not block access to banned, including extremist, sites.
On April 30, 2015, it became known about the submission made by the Prosecutor's Office of the Arkhangelsk Region to the Regional Minister of Education and Science. The reason for the sanction, in particular, was the fact that in a number of schools in the region, students had access to prohibited, including extremist, Internet resources. The number of schools is not specified. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On April 28, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's offices of Belokholunitsky, Verkhnekamsky, Zuevsky, Nemsky, Omutninsky, Falensky, Yuryansky districts of the Kirov region and the Oktyabrsky district of Kirov took response measures due to the fact that in a number of schools in these areas access to prohibited, including extremist materials on the Internet. The number of schools and the nature of the sanctions are not specified. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On April 24, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the city of Strezhevoy, Tomsk Region, submitted a proposal to the directors of six schools in the city to eliminate violations of the law. At least part of these sanctions are due to the fact that the content filters installed on school computers did not prevent access to materials deemed extremist.
On April 22, 2015, it became known about the submissions made by the Yegorievsk City Prosecutor's Office of the Moscow Region to the directors of schools No. S.A. Calabalina. The reason for the sanctions was that content filters installed on school computers did not restrict access to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On April 21, 2015, the prosecutor's office of Neryungri (Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)) announced the submission made by the head of the administration of the Neryungri district and administrative cases under Part 1 of Art. 6.17 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violation of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the protection of children from information harmful to their health and development), initiated against the directors of schools No. 1 and No. 2 in Neryungri. The reason for the sanctions was that from computers installed in schools, there was access to banned, including extremist, sites. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On April 21, 2015, it became known about the submission made by the prosecutor's office of the Abatsky district of the Tyumen region to the director of the local school due to the fact that the content filters installed on school computers "do not fully restrict students' access to extremist information ."
On April 21, 2015, it became known about the submission made to the director of the Osinovskaya school in the Nikolsky district of the Vologda region by the prosecutor's office of the Nikolsky district. The reason for the sanction was, in particular, the fact that the content filters installed on school computers do not cope with their task.
On April 21, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Magadan region announced 9 submissions on the elimination of violations of the law made by the heads of educational institutions in the region. In particular, the prosecutor's office of the Omchukchansky district of the Magadan region introduced sanctions against the directors of secondary and comprehensive schools in the village of Omsukchan, the village of Dukat and vocational school No. 11 due to the fact that school computers had access to extremist information. Similar response measures were taken by the prosecutor's office of the Srednekansky district of the Magadan region in relation to the principals of two secondary schools. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On April 17, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Primorsky Territory announced the submission made to the Vice Governor of the Primorsky Territory, who oversees the activities of the Department of Education and Science. The reason for the sanction was violations in the activities of the Department of Education and Science of the Primorsky Territory, in particular, the facts of " improper functioning of content filtering tools in schools ", which allowed access to prohibited, including extremist, materials.
On April 17, 2015, it became known about three lawsuits filed with the court by the prosecutor's office of the Malovishersky district of the Novgorod region, which contain a demand to oblige the heads of three schools in the district to block access from school computers to prohibited, including extremist, materials on the Internet. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters are installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On April 13, 2015, the Kostroma prosecutor's office announced the submissions made to the directors of two city schools, as well as the chairman of the Committee for Education, Sports Culture and Work with Youth of the Kostroma Administration. The reason for the sanctions was that the content filters installed on school computers " in full " do not restrict access to prohibited information, including extremist information.
On April 9, 2015, it became known about a lawsuit filed with the court by the prosecutor's office of the Maiminsky district of the Republic of Altai. The statement of claim contains a demand to the leadership of the Karasuk school to eliminate violations of the rights of minors to be protected from information that could harm their health and development. The reason for the lawsuit was that the content filtering system installed on school computers allowed access to prohibited, including extremist, information.
On April 3, 2015, it became known that the Vsevolozhsk City Prosecutor's Office of the Leningrad Region sent three statements of claim for the obligation of educational institutions to block access to materials from the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The reason for the lawsuits was that in a number of educational institutions of the city " the content filtering system on computers has not been established " and therefore there is access to prohibited materials: in particular, in Sertolovskaya school No. included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. It is not clear from the prosecutor's report whether content filters were installed on school computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would have indicated their absence.
On March 31, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Sovetsky District of Lipetsk announced the submissions made to the leaders of the Voronezh Institute of Economics and Law and a branch of the Institute of International Law and Economics. The reason for the sanctions was that, despite the content filters installed on the educational computers, students had access to prohibited, including extremist, sites.
On March 31, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of Zarinsk, Altai Territory, took response measures against six educational institutions of the city (details were not disclosed). The reason for the sanctions was, in particular, the fact that the computers of these institutions had access to prohibited, including extremist, materials. The prosecutor's report does not say whether content filters were installed on the computers, but we assume that they would otherwise be indicated as absent.
On March 31, 2015, the prosecutor's office of Rubtsovsk, Altai Territory, reported on the submissions made to the directors of two schools in the city due to the fact that the content filters installed on school computers did not block access to materials recognized as extremist.
On March 27, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Kostroma region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Chukhlomsky district had filed a motion to eliminate violations of the law against the director of the Sudai secondary school. The reason was, in particular, that the content filter installed on school computers did not fully cope with the task.
On March 26, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Sverdlovsk region reported that the Magistrate's Court of District No. 1 of the city of Berezovsky fined the Central Library System of the city for 20 thousand rubles under Part 2 of Art. 6.17 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation (non-use by a person organizing access to information distributed via the Internet in places accessible to children, administrative and organizational measures, technical, software and hardware to protect children from information that is harmful to their health and development). The reason for the persecution was that the content filter installed on the computer in the library's reading room did not fully cope with the task. In addition, a proposal was made to the director of the CBS to eliminate violations of the law, after which the CBS programmer was brought to disciplinary responsibility. It is reported that the violations committed by the library have been eliminated.
On March 25, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Perm Territory reported that the Prosecutor's Office of the Uinsky District had made representations to the directors of eight local schools. The reason was that the content filtering system installed on the computers could not cope with the task. It is reported that the violations were eliminated, computer science teachers were brought to disciplinary responsibility.
On March 25, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Magadan region announced that the prosecutor's office of the Omsukchansky district had made a submission to the director of Vocational School No. 11. The reason was, in particular, that the content filtering system installed on the computers could not cope with the task.
On March 23, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Altai reported that an audit conducted in the municipal schools of Gorno-Altaisk revealed that the content filters installed on school computers did not fully cope with the task. In this regard, the directors of educational institutions were submitted recommendations for their immediate elimination. In addition, it is reported that a similar presentation of the city prosecutor's office was considered on March 19, 2015 in the Republican Gymnasium named after. V.A. Plakas, two employees were brought to disciplinary responsibility.
On March 16, 2015, it became known about five lawsuits on the obligation to block access to extremist materials, which the prosecutor's office of the Anninsky district of the Voronezh region filed with the leadership of the Pugachev, Ramon, Bolsheyasyr, Novozhiznenskaya, Novokurlak schools of the district. The reason for the lawsuits was that school computers installed in computer science classrooms had access to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The prosecutor's report does not say whether content filters were installed on the computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On March 13, 2015, it became known about the submission that the prosecutor's office of the Leninsky district of Samara made to the director of gymnasium No. 11 of Samara. The reason for the submission was a " failure of the content filter ", as a result of which access to prohibited materials became possible from school computers.
On March 13, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Muchkapsky district of the Tambov region announced the submission made to the director of the Central Library of the Muchkapsky district. The reason for the submission was, in particular, the lack of content filters on library computers. The episode is included in our selection because the claims here are identical to the usual claims against schools. In addition, libraries are not educational institutions and are not included in the program for the mandatory installation of content filtering systems.
On March 10, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of Yemanzhelinsk, Chelyabinsk Region, announced eight lawsuits against the heads of city schools, in which they demanded that access to sites with extremist materials be blocked. The reason for the sanction of the prosecutor's office was that school computers had access to extremist information. The prosecutor's report does not say whether content filters were installed on the computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On March 6, 2015, it became known about the submissions made by the Solikamsk City Prosecutor's Office of the Perm Territory to the directors of four Solikamsk schools, which contained a requirement to install a content filtering system on school computers. However, it is clear from the prosecutor's report that such a system was already installed on school computers, but " the existing content filters are not enough ", which is why students had access to prohibited information.
On March 4, 2015, it became known about five statements of claim on the obligation to eliminate violations filed by the prosecutor's office of Makhachkala against the heads of schools in Makhachkala. The sanctions were caused, in particular, by the fact that computers in school computer science classrooms had access to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The prosecutor's report does not say whether content filters were installed on the computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On March 3, 2015, the Gorno-Altaisk prosecutor's office reported on the submission made to the leadership of school No. 7 of Gorno-Altaisk in connection with the fact that access to sites with prohibited, was “ inappropriately ” restricted on school computers. including extremist, materials
On February 25, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Sovetsky district of Kazan announced the submissions made to the head of the education department of the administration of the Sovetsky district of Kazan, Venera Nureeva, and the director of the Kazan Construction College, Alexander Prosnev. The reason for the sanctions was that, despite the established content filters, from the computers of the Russian-Tatar school No. 124, schools No. 141 and No. 84 of Kazan, as well as the Kazan Construction College, it was possible to access prohibited, including extremist, materials.
On February 25, 2015, it became known about the submissions made by the prosecutor's office of the Gryazinsky district of the Lipetsk region to the leaders of 10 schools in the Gryazinsky district. The reason for the sanctions was, in particular, that the computers installed in the classrooms had access to materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The prosecutor's report does not mention the presence of content filters on school computers, however, we proceed from the fact that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On February 11, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Yaroslavl region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Kirovsky district of Yaroslavl had made submissions to the leadership of five educational institutions: the Center for Children and Youth Technical Creativity, as well as secondary schools No. 1, 7, 49 and 70. The reason was that the established on the computers of these institutions, content filters did not cope with the task. It is reported that the submissions were satisfied and the violations were eliminated.
On February 11, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Krasnokutsk district of the Saratov region filed three lawsuits against three local schools with a demand to oblige them to establish the proper operation of content filters that did not provide full protection against prohibited information, so, in particular, access to the websites of Ukrainian organizations banned in Russia was possible from school computers.
On February 2, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Cherepovets district of the Vologda region announced the submission made to the director of the Sosnovskaya secondary school. The reason for the sanction was that there was no “proper content filtering” on school computers, which made it possible to access prohibited, including extremist, information.
On February 2, 2015, it became known that in the fourth quarter of 2014, the Bui interdistrict prosecutor's office of the Kostroma region made submissions to a number of directors of educational institutions of the city (the exact number was not reported), due to the fact that computers in the computer science rooms of these institutions had access to materials, included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The prosecutor's report does not say whether content filters were installed on the computers, but we assume that otherwise the prosecutor's office would point out their absence.
On January 28, 2015, it became known about the submission made by the prosecutor's office of the Oktyabrsky district of Penza to the rector of the Penza State Technological University. The reason for the sanction was, in particular, the fact that computers installed in the university library, despite the existing content filters, had access to prohibited materials (for example, A. Hitler's book "Mein Kampf").
On January 20, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Sonkovsky district of the Tver region announced the submission made to the director of the Sonkovsky inter-settlement library. The reason for the sanction was that the content filters installed in the Central Library of the District and the Bilyanytska Rural Library allowed access to prohibited materials, including those included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The episode is included in our selection because the claims here are identical to the usual claims against schools. In addition, libraries are not educational institutions and are not included in the program for the mandatory installation of content filtering systems.
On January 14, 2015, the Kerch City Court of the Republic of Crimea found the director of the Kerch PPM guilty of an offense under Art. 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (mass distribution of extremist materials) and fined him 2,000 rubles. The case was initiated by the prosecutor's office of Kerch due to the fact that content filtering systems were not installed on computers in city libraries. The episode is included in our selection because the claims here are identical to the usual claims against schools. In addition, libraries are not educational institutions and are not included in the program for the mandatory installation of content filtering systems.
On January 13, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Krasnovishersky district of the Perm Territory announced the submissions made to the directors of the Parshakovskaya and Bychinskaya schools of the Krasnovishersky district. The reason for the sanctions was that the content filtering system installed on school computers did not block access to prohibited, including extremist, materials.
Sources