Translated material
Sanctions against library employees. Part 4
Since the emergence of the Federal List of Extremist Literature, cases of sanctions against library employees have become regular. Even in cases where claims against librarians are formally justified by anti-extremist legislation, we often do not consider them legitimate, since this legislation is in conflict with the law “On Librarianship.” Read more about this here .
In addition, anti-extremist sanctions against libraries for not having a list of extremist materials, in our opinion, look like an imitation of activity designed to artificially inflate the relevant statistics.
We combined these cases into a single list, the first part of which covers the period from July 2008 to June 2011, the second part - from July 2011 to June 2012, and the third part - from July 2012 to the end of 2014. The continuation of the list is in front of you.
On December 30, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Novosibirsk region reported that during the year the prosecutor's office of the Pervomaisky district of Novosibirsk conducted inspections in 10 schools and two vocational education institutions and found that in school libraries (apparently in all) " employees do not have information about banned books and other printed materials of an extremist nature, do not take measures to obtain a list of prohibited extremist materials, do not compare existing and incoming literature in library collections with the regularly updated federal list of extremist materials ." Requests were made to school directors to eliminate violations of the law, and employees were brought to disciplinary liability.
On December 22, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Chelyabinsk region reported that the Kartaly city prosecutor's office lodged protests against the director of the Central Library System of the Kartaly region and the director of school No. 17 in the city of Kartaly, and also warned them about the inadmissibility of violating the law on protecting children from inappropriate information. The instructions issued by the head of the Central Library for working with the Federal List of Extremist Materials and the order of the school director stipulated that libraries could issue books included in the list upon written request from the reader. The prosecutor's office considered that this procedure violates the law. The leaders satisfied the protests of the prosecutor's office and changed the documents.
On December 18, 2015, the prosecutor's office of Tatarstan reported that the prosecutor's office of the Alekseevsky district submitted proposals to eliminate violations of anti-extremist legislation to the heads of Sredentiganskaya and Bolshetiganskaya secondary schools and the Bolshetiganskaya rural library. The reason was that school and rural libraries did not regularly and fully check their collections against the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On December 8, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Leningrad region reported that the Kingisepp city prosecutor's office submitted proposals to eliminate violations of the legislation on countering extremism to the director of the Ivangorod Humanitarian and Technical Institute (a branch of the St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation) and the head of the administration of the Bolshelutsk rural settlement. The reason was that university and rural libraries did not check with the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On December 3, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Belgorod region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Ivnyansky district sent 12 statements of claim to the court to force the heads of educational institutions to bring the provisions on libraries into line with the requirements of federal legislation. As the prosecutor's office points out, they do not contain rules aimed at preventing the spread of extremist and terrorist materials, in particular, when forming library collections.
On November 27, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Tver region reported that prosecutors in various districts of Tver and the region, as a result of conducting an inspection in educational institutions to ensure compliance with the requirements of the legislation on countering terrorism and extremism, made a number of recommendations to eliminate violations of the law to the school administration. Among other things, the reason was that the school library of secondary school No. 1 of the Kashinsky district did not have a recent version of the Federal List of Extremist Materials to compare the library fund and new acquisitions with it, and in the libraries of the Brusovskaya, Moldinskaya and Ryadskaya schools of the Udomelsky district there was no list at all.
On November 25, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor’s office of the Zavitinsky district of the Amur region submitted a proposal to the director of school No. 1 of Zavitinsk to eliminate violations of the law, including countering extremism. The audit found that the school library had not updated the Federal List of Extremist Materials and had not identified an official who was required to reconcile the fund and receipts with the list. The head of the library was brought to disciplinary liability in the form of a reprimand.
On November 13, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Gribanovsky district of the Voronezh region announced warnings against violating the legislation on countering extremism to librarians of five district schools. The reason was that school libraries did not have the latest version of the Federal List of Extremist Materials, and the contents of the collections and new receipts were checked against the 2013 version.
On November 9, 2015, it became known about 17 warnings about the inadmissibility of violating the law and the same number of submissions made by the prosecutor's office of the Leninsky district of Makhachkala to school principals in the district. The reason for the sanctions was that the regulations on the school libraries of these institutions did not contain a direct ban on the distribution of extremist literature, the procedure for checking the library collection and incoming literature with the Federal lists of extremist materials, and the verifications themselves were not carried out.
On November 5, 2015, it became known about 9 submissions made by the Mikhailovsky District Prosecutor's Office of the Ryazan Region to the directors of educational institutions in the region. The reason for the sanctions was that the regulations on the libraries of these institutions did not contain a direct ban on the distribution of extremist literature and did not establish the obligation to reconcile the library collections and incoming literature with the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On October 26, 2015, it became known about protests against the provisions on libraries and warnings about the inadmissibility of violating the law, submitted to the rectors of four Moscow universities: Russian Economic University. G.V. Plekhanov, State Academic University of Humanities, Moscow State University of Design and Technology, National Research Technological University "MISiS" Zamoskvoretsky Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of Moscow. The prosecutor's office's claims were caused by the fact that the regulations on libraries did not contain a direct ban on the distribution of extremist literature and did not determine the procedure for reconciling funds and incoming literature with the Federal List of Extremist Materials. Based on the results of consideration of the protests, the provisions on libraries were brought into compliance with the law.
On October 13, 2015, it became known about the submissions made by the Prosecutor's Office of the Chechen Republic to the heads of pre-trial detention center No. 2 of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia for the Chechen Republic. The reason for the sanctions was, in particular, that the library of the pre-trial detention center did not check the literature with the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On October 9, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the ZATO Snezhinsk, Chelyabinsk region, submitted proposals to eliminate violations of the legislation on countering extremist activities by the head of several educational organizations and the head of the city education department. The reason for the sanctions was that collection reconciliations in school libraries were not carried out in a timely manner, and copies of the Federal List of Extremist Materials were not updated.
On September 30, 2015, it became known about a lawsuit regarding the obligation to ensure control over the regularity of changes to the Federal List of Extremist Materials, filed by the prosecutor's office of the city of Udachny (Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) to the management of city vocational school No. 28. The reason for the lawsuit was that in the school library there was an outdated version of the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The proceedings in the case were terminated due to the voluntary compliance with the demands of the prosecutor's office.
On September 11, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Tula region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Volovsky district had submitted proposals to eliminate violations of the legislation on countering extremism to the directors of nine local schools. The reason was that in the libraries of Baskakovskaya Secondary School, Volovskaya Secondary School No. 1, Volovskaya Secondary School No. 2, Lutovskaya Secondary School, Boryatinskaya Secondary School, Verkhupskaya Secondary School, Nepryadvenskaya Secondary School, Dvorikovskaya Secondary School and Station Secondary School there was no full version of the Federal List of Extremist Materials for checking library collections with it and new arrivals.
On September 10, 2015, it became known about a proposal made to the management of the Coastal School of the Novooskolsky District of the Belgorod Region. The violation was seen in the fact that local acts of the institution did not provide for the procedure for reconciling the library collection with the Federal List of Extremist Materials, and such reconciliations themselves were not carried out.
On September 7, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Altai Republic reported that the prosecutor's office of the Turochaksky district submitted a proposal to eliminate violations of the legislation on countering extremist activities to the administration of the Tondoshen secondary school. The reason for the penalty was that school employees “do not have information about 169 extremist materials .”
On August 27, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Turochaksky district of the Altai Republic submitted proposals to eliminate violations of the law to the heads of the library named after. V.M. Bashunov and the children's library of the House of Creativity and Leisure of the Turochak district. The reason for the sanctions was that in the library. V.M. Bashunov did not have an updated copy of the Federal List of Extremist Materials (which did not contain information about “ 26 extremist materials ”), and the children’s library of the House of Creativity and Leisure did not have any copy of the List.
On August 27, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Pervomaisky district of the Tomsk region reported on the submissions made to the directors of five schools in the district. The reason for the sanctions was that for the last two years, school libraries have not carried out verification of collections and incoming literature with the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On August 18, 2015, it became known about a number of submissions (the exact number is unknown) made to the heads of educational institutions of the Teplo-Ogarevsky district of the Tula region by the prosecutor's office of the Teplo-Ogarevsky district. The reason for the sanctions was, among other things, the absence of a Federal List of Extremist Materials in these institutions or the presence of an outdated version of it.
On July 24, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Ivanovo region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Zavolzhsky district had submitted recommendations to eliminate violations of the legislation on countering extremism to the heads of 8 educational institutions; they were considered by the Zavolzhsky Court and satisfied in full. The reason was that the libraries of educational institutions did not have the latest version of the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On July 23, 2015, the Vladimir prosecutor's office reported nine submissions made to the directors of city schools. The reason for the sanctions was that school libraries did not check the collections and incoming literature with the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On July 22, 2015, it became known about the proposal made by the prosecutor's office of the city of Gubkinsky (Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug) to the management of school No. 4 of Gubkinsky. The reason for the sanction was the absence in the school library of an updated copy of the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On July 9, 2015, it became known about the submission that the North-Western Transport Prosecutor's Office made to the management of the St. Petersburg University of Civil Aviation. The reason for the sanction was that the university library did not have an updated version of the Federal List of Extremist Materials, and the library collections were not checked against the List.
On June 30, 2015, the Serpukhov City Prosecutor's Office of the Moscow Region reported on a proposal made to the head of the pre-trial detention center-3 of the Federal Penitentiary Service for the Moscow Region. The reason for the sanctions was that the library of the pre-trial detention center did not check the collections with the Federal List of Extremist Materials. During the inspection, a book included in the List was found in the library, after which it was confiscated and destroyed. Let us remind you that the legislation on library science does not provide for the possibility of removing literature from collections. Law enforcement agencies had the right to demand only the exclusion of public access to prohibited materials.
On June 26, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of Yoshkar-Ola (Mari-El) made a representation to the director of the city secondary school named after V.S. Arkhipova. The reason for the presentation was that books were discovered in the school library, “ the content of which incites hatred and enmity .” It is unknown whether these publications were in the public domain and whether they were included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials, but we assume that librarians are guided by the legislation on library science.
On June 23, 2015, it became known about the submission made by the Vyshnevolotsk Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of the Tver Region to the director of the Vyshnevolotsk College. The reason for the sanction was, in particular, that the college library did not check its collections against the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On June 15, 2015, it became known about protests brought by the prosecutor's office of the Pravoberezhny district of Magnitogorsk against the regulations on the libraries of the city's pedagogical and polytechnic colleges. The reason for the sanctions was that the provisions did not contain a ban on the distribution and storage for the purpose of disseminating extremist literature.
On June 9, 2015, it became known about 64 proposals to eliminate violations of the law submitted to the heads of educational institutions in Derbent and the Derbent region of the Republic of Dagestan. All of them were caused by the fact that the libraries of these institutions do not have copies of the Federal List of Extremist Materials and reconciliations with the List of holdings and incoming literature are not carried out.
On June 5, 2015, the prosecutor's office of Mirny (Republic of Sakha - Yakutia) reported on the submissions made to the directors of two schools in the Mirny district. The reason for the sanctions was that school libraries did not check the collections and incoming literature with the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On June 3, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Trans-Baikal Territory reported that the prosecutor's office of the Uletovsky district issued a warning about the inadmissibility of violating the legislation on countering extremism to the teacher-librarian of the Drovyaninskaya secondary school, who, when conducting checks of the school library fund and new acquisitions for the presence of extremist materials, did not use the latter version of the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On June 3, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Kaluga region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Sukhinichi district made nine representations to the heads of regional educational institutions and the head of the education department of the district administration, 17 officials were brought to disciplinary liability. The reason was, in particular, that there was no Federal List of Extremist Materials in school libraries.
On June 2, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Polessky district of the Kaliningrad region revealed in the regulations on the school library that there was no ban on the distribution and storage of extremist literature. The prosecutor's response measures have not been specified.
On June 1, 2015, it became known about the presentation made by the transport prosecutor's office of the Krasnodar region to the management of the Yeisk Marine Fisheries College, a branch of the Astrakhan State Technical University. The reason for the sanction was, in particular, that the library of the educational institution did not check the funds and incoming materials with the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On May 27, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Altai Republic reported that the prosecutor's office of the Chemal district was made warnings to the heads of six educational institutions of the district. The reason was, in particular, the fact that in the libraries of educational institutions there were outdated versions of the federal list of extremist materials, not all institutions were reconciling literature with a list. The performances were satisfied, 16 officials were brought to disciplinary liability.
On May 26, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Silkovsky district of the Chechen Republic reported that the head of 17 municipal district libraries announced warnings on the inadmissibility of violation of the law. The reason for the sanctions was that the libraries did not reconcile the fund and incoming literature with the federal list of extremist materials.
On May 26, 2015, it became known about 10 performances made by the directors of schools of the Tandinsky district of the Republic of Tuva. The reason for the sanctions was that in school libraries there were no reconciliation of the fund and incoming literature with the federal list of extremist materials.
On May 20, 2015, it became known about the performances made by the prosecutor's office of the Khinsky district of the Novosibirsk region to the directors of five schools in the district. The reason for the sanctions was that school libraries did not reconnect funds and incoming literature with the federal list of extremist materials.
On May 13, 2015, it became known about the ideas that the prosecutor's office of the Karabash of the Chelyabinsk region introduced the principals of school No. 6 of the Karabash and the Karabash branch of the Kaslinsky industrial and humanitarian technical school. The reason for the sanctions was, in particular, that in these educational institutions there was no regular reconciliation of the library fund with the federal list of extremist materials.
On April 21, 2015, it became known about the presentation made by the director of the Osinovskaya school of the Nikolsky district of the Vologda region by the prosecutor's office of the Nikolsky district. The reason for the sanction was, in particular, that the school library did not have a copy of the federal list of extremist materials and the reconciliation of library funds and incoming literature with it were not carried out.
On April 21, 2015, it became known about the presentation made by the prosecutor's office of the Yagodninsky district of the Magadan region, the director of the School of the village of Pubybin and the presentation made by the prosecutor's office of the Tenkinsky district of the Magadan region, the director of the school of the village of Omchak. The reason for both sanctions was that in school libraries there was an outdated copy of the federal list of extremist materials.
On April 8, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Parfenievsky district of the Kostroma region announced the ideas made to the directors of the Parfenev and Nikolo-Polomsk schools, as well as the head of the district administration. The reason for the sanctions, in particular, was that, in school libraries there were no updated copies of the federal list of extremist materials, and the reconciliation of funds and incoming literature with the list was not carried out monthly.
On April 6, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Oktyabrsky district of the Kostroma region announced the ideas made to the directors of the Bogovarovsk school named after L.A. Tsymlyakova and Solovetsky school. The reason for the sanctions was that in the provisions on school libraries there was no direct ban on the distribution of extremist literature and the procedure for conducting the Fund's Farm and the incoming literature with the federal list of extremist materials was not established.
On April 3, 2015, the Vsevolozhsk city prosecutor's office of the Leningrad Region announced the ideas of school managers (the number is not specified) and two protests on local regulatory acts regulating work with the library fund. The sanctions are caused by the fact that in the libraries of urban schools, in particular, in the Vsevolozhsk education center of education, a reconciliation magazine of the library fund with the federal list of extremist materials was not updated since 2014, no acts of reconciliation were compiled, and there was no current copy of the federal list of extremist materials.
On April 1, 2015, it became known about the statement of claim of the prosecutor's office of the Kuznetsk Penza region to eliminate violations of the law. The reason for the lawsuit was that in the school libraries of the city there are no reconciliation of the library fund and incoming literature with the federal list of extremist materials.
On March 30, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Saratov region said that the prosecutor's office of the Turkovsky district made submissions to eliminate violations of the law and bring the perpetrators to disciplinary liability to directors of 12 schools in the district. The reason was that school libraries did not have a fresh version of the federal list of extremist materials, they were not assigned those responsible for the reconciliation of funds and incoming literature with the list and such reconciliations were not carried out.
On March 25, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Magadan Region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Omsukchansky district was submitted to the director of a professional school No. 11. The reason was, in particular, the fact that the school library did not contain the current version of the federal list of extremist materials.
On March 25, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Kostroma region said that the prosecutor's office of the Makaryevsky district made four submission to the leadership of local educational institutions. Among other things, the reason was that in libraries of educational institutions there were no reconciliation of funds with the federal list of extremist materials.
On March 19, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Udmurtia said that the prosecutor's office of the Oktyabrskaya district prosecutor of Izhevsk was introduced that it was necessary to eliminate violations of the legislation on counteracting extremism to the rector of the Izhevsk State Technical University named after M.T. Kalashnikova, Director of the Scientific Library and Vice-Rector of the University of Security and Regime, were brought to disciplinary liability, and Deputy Director of the Scientific Library for Organizational and Methodological was fined 2000 rubles under Art. 20.29 Code of Administrative Offenses (mass distribution of extremist materials included in the published federal list of extremist materials, as well as their storage for mass distribution). The reason was that the library fund in the free access was several recognized extremist publications.
On March 13, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Muchkap district of the Tambov region announced the presentation made by the director of the Central Library of the Muchkapsky district. The reason for the presentation was, in particular, an outdated copy of the federal list of extremist materials at the time of verification, which was in the library.
On February 28, 2015, from a review message from the prosecutor's office of the Udmurt Republic on the events of 2014, it became known that the director of the library of the Udmurt State University in 2014 was brought to administrative responsibility under Art. 20.29 Code of Administrative Offenses (distribution of extremist materials), since the library was freely available books recognized as extremist.
On February 25, 2015, the Gryazinsky Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of the Lipetsk Region announced the ideas made by the heads of 10 schools of the Gryazinsky district. The sanctions were caused, in particular, by the fact that in school libraries there were no copies of the federal list of extremist materials.
On February 20, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Bondar district of the Tambov region announced the presentation made by the head of the Bondar inter -settlement library. The reason for the presentation was that a copy of the federal list of extremist materials available in the library was incomplete (2500 points against 2588 points at the time of the audit).
On February 19, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Smolensk region said that the prosecutor's office of the Yershich district made an idea of eliminating violations of anti -extremist legislation against the directors of educational institutions of the district due to the fact that the school libraries had an outdated version of the federal list of extremist materials, and reconciliation with it Not carried out.
On February 12, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Dagestan said that the prosecutor's office of the Sergokalinsky district brought 15 protests on the provisions on school libraries of general educational institutions of the district no ban on the distribution of extremist materials and did not establish the procedure for reconciling funds and incoming literature with the federal list of extremist materials.
On February 5, 2015, the Prosecutor's Office of the Leningrad Region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Lomonosovsky district made nine protests on the charters of school libraries and ideas about eliminating violations of legislation against the directors of the district schools. The reason was that in the charters of school libraries there was no Regulation on the reconciliation of funds with the federal list of extremist materials, the persons responsible for reconciliation were not appointed.
On January 28, 2015, it became known about the presentation that the prosecutor's office of the Turochak district of the Altai Republic contributed to the director of the Dmitrievsky school of the Turochak district. The reason for the sanction was that the copy of the federal list of extremist materials in the school library was outdated: it differed from the 18 points acting at the time of verification.
On January 22, 2015, it became known about claims filed in court to the prosecutor's office of the Nurbin district of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). The reason for the claims was that in the libraries of the Oski school and the Nyurba school No. 3 there were no reconciliation of library funds and incoming literature with the federal list of extremist materials. The claims are in full.
Sources
- The prosecutor's office of the Nurbin district revealed violations of the legislation on counteracting extremism // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). 2015. January 22.
- The prosecutor's office of the Turochak district revealed violations of the legislation on counteracting extremist activities // website of the prosecutor's office of the Altai Republic. 2015. 28 January.
- The prosecutor's office of the Lomonosov district demanded to eliminate violations of the law on counteracting an extremist of activities in school libraries // Site of the Prosecutor's Office of the Leningrad Region. 2015. February 5.
- The prosecutor's office of the Sergokalinsky district conducted an audit of the execution of education legislation // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Dagestan. 2015. February 12.
- Library workers are obliged to conduct checks in the content of incoming books in order to prevent access to the library fund of extremist materials // The website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Tambov Region. 2015. February 20.
- In 10 educational institutions of the Gryazinsky district, students had free access to extremist materials // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Lipetsk region. 2015. February 25.
- The prosecutor’s office checked compliance with the law on countering extremist manifestations and the effectiveness of the prevention of extremism in the youth environment // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Udmurtia. 2015. 28 February.
- The prosecutor's office requires the disciplinary liability of library workers who did not ensure the non -governmental execution of the legislation on countering extremism // website of the prosecutor's office of the Tambov region. 2015. March 13.
- In the library of the State Technical University, extremist materials have been discovered // website of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Udmurtia. 2015. March 19.
- The complex of measures of the prosecutor’s response was adopted by the prosecutor of the Makaryevsky district based on the results of the audit of the execution of the legislation on education // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Kostroma region. 2015. March 25.
- In the Omsukchansky district, the prosecutor’s audit revealed violations of the legislation on education, including when paying scholarships and wages // The prosecutor's office of the Magadan region. 2015. March 25.
- The prosecutor's office of the Turkovsky district conducted a check of compliance by educational institutions of the district of legislation on the prevention of extremism in the youth environment // Site of the prosecutor's office of the Saratov region. 2015. 30.
- The prosecutor's office of Kuznetsk revealed violations of the legislation on counteracting extremism in municipal educational organizations // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Penza region. 2015. April 1.
- The Vsevolozhsk city prosecutor's office introduced acts of response to the heads of schools, security organizations and the Internet provider // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Leningrad Region. 2015. April 3.
- The prosecutor's office of the Oktyabrsky district revealed violations of the law in the provisions of school libraries // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Kostroma region. 2015. April 6.
- The prosecutor's office of the Parfenevsky district took measures to eliminate violations of the legislation on education // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Kostroma region. 2015. April 8.
- The prosecutor's office of the Nikolsky district conducted compliance with the legislation that protects children from information harmful to their health, moral and spiritual development // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Vologda Oblast. 2015. April 21.
- The prosecutor's office of the Magadan region summed up the results of inspections in the educational institutions of the region // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Magadan region.
- At the request of the prosecutor of Karabash, officials of educational institutions were held liable for open access to sites containing information prohibited for distribution // The prosecutor's office of the Chelyabinsk Region. 2015. May 13.
- Schools have submitted ideas about eliminating legislation on counteracting extremism // Site of the prosecutor's office of the Novosibirsk region. 2015. May 20.
- In Tuva, the prosecutor's office in the libraries of schools revealed violations of legislation on counteracting extremism // website of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Tuva. 2015. May 26.
- The prosecutor's office warned on the inadmissibility of violation of the law on counteracting extremism // Site of the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic. 2015. May 26.
- The transport prosecutor's office revealed violations in the fishing technical school in Yeysk // Business Yeisk. 2015. June 1.
- The prosecutor's office of the Kaliningrad region checked the implementation of the requirements of the legislation on education // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Kaliningrad region. 2015. June 2.
- In the Sukhinichsky district, violations of the legislation on the education and counteraction of extremist activities in educational organizations were identified // Website of the Prosecutor's Office of the Kaluga Region. 2015. June 3.
- The prosecutor's office of the Uletovsky district takes measures to ensure the safety of schools // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Trans -Baikal Territory. 2015. June 3.
- The prosecutor's office of the city of Mirny establishes the facts of failure to take measures to counteract extremism with educational organizations // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Sakha - Yakutia. 2015. June 5.
- The prosecutor's office of the city of Derbent conducted a check of the implementation of legislation in the field of information counteracting extremism and terrorism // The site of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Dagestan. 2015. June 9.
- In Magnitogorsk, at the request of the prosecutor, the provisions on libraries in colleges are brought into line with the law // website of the prosecutor's office of the Chelyabinsk region. 2015. June 15.
- The Vyshnevolotsk inter -district prosecutor’s office was checking compliance with the legislation in the implementation of educational activities in the state budgetary professional educational institution "Vyshnevolotsky College" // website of the prosecutor's office of the Tver region. 2015. June 23.
- The Yoshkar-Ola prosecutor's office takes measures to protect children from information harmful to their health and development // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Mari-El. 2015. 26 June.
- The Serpukhov City Prosecutor's Office conducted an audit of the implementation of the legislation in the field of counteracting extremism and terrorism by a supervised investigative insulator // Website of the prosecutor's office of the Moscow Region. 2015. June 30.
- The University of Civil Aviation of St. Petersburg did not follow extremist materials // Rosbalt. 2015. July 9.
- The district prosecutor’s office revealed violations of the legislation on the protection of minors from information that harm their health and mental development in schools // The website of the Yamalo -Nenets Autonomous Okrug. 2015. July 22.
- The prosecutor's office of the city of Vladimir took measures aimed at eliminating violations of legislation on countering extremist activities in a number of schools of the regional center // Site of the prosecutor's office of the Vladimir region. 2015. July 23.
- //
- In educational institutions of the Zavolzhsky district, violations of the legislation on counteracting extremism // website of the prosecutor's office of the Ivanovo region were revealed. 2015. July 24.
- The prosecutor's office of the Tepl-Ogarevsky district conducted an audit of the execution of the legislation on counteracting terrorism and extremist activities in educational institutions // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Tula region. 2015. August 18.
- In the Pervomaisky district, at the request of the school prosecutor's office, they eliminated violations of legislation on counteracting extremist activities // The site of the prosecutor's office of the Tomsk region. 2015. August 27.
- Прокуратура Турочакского района выявила нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремистской деятельности // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Алтай. 2015. 27 августа.
- Прокуратура Турочакского района выявила нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремистской деятельности // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Горный Алтай. 2015. 7 сентября.
- В Белгородской области прокуратурой подведены итоги проверки соблюдения федерального законодательства образовательными учреждениями при подготовке к новому учебному году // Сайт прокуратуры Белгородской области. 2015. 10 сентября.
- Прокуратурой Воловского района выявлены нарушения законодательства о профилактике противодействия экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Тульской области. 2015. 11 сентября.
- Прокуратурой защищены права детей от вредной информации // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Саха (Якутия). 2015. 30 сентября.
- По иску прокурора ЗАТО г. Снежинск суд обязал образовательное учреждение устранить нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Сайта прокуратуры Челябинской области. 2015. 9 октября.
- По представлению прокурора республики к ответственности привлечено 7 должностных лиц следственного изолятора № 2 УФСИН России по ЧР // Сайт прокуратуры Чеченской Республики. 2015. 13 октября.
- Замоскворецкая межрайонная прокуратуры обязала образовательные учреждения привести в соответствие с законом положения о библиотеках // Сайт прокуратуры Москвы. 2015. 26 октября.
- По требованию Михайловской районной прокуратуры устранены нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Рязанской области. 2015. 5 ноября.
- Прокуратура Ленинского района города Махачкалы внесла представления и объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушений закона руководителям 17 образовательных учреждений // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Дагестан. 2015. 9 ноября.
- Прокуратура Грибановского района предостерегла школьные библиотеки о недопустимости нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Воронежской области. 2015. 13 ноября.
- В Амурской области по требованию прокурора Завитинского района образовательное учреждение устранило нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремистской деятельности // Сайт прокуратуры Амурской области. 2015. 25 ноября.
- Прокуратурой Тверской области проверено исполнение требований федерального законодательства о противодействии терроризму и экстремизму в образовательных учреждениях области // Сайт прокуратуры Тверской области. 2015. 27 ноября.
- В Ивнянском районе прокуратурой приняты меры, направленные на профилактику проявлений терроризма и экстремизма в молодежной среде // Сайт прокуратуры Белгородской области. 2015. 3 декабря.
- Кингисеппская городская прокуратура потребовала обеспечить меры по противодействию экстремизму в библиотечных фондах // Сайт прокуратуры Лениградской области. 2015. December 8.
- Прокуратура Алексеевского района потребовала от руководителей двух сельских школ и библиотеки устранить нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Татарстан. 2015. 18 декабря.
- Прокурорами приняты меры реагирования к нарушителям законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Челябинской области. 2015. 22 декабря.
- В Первомайском районе г. Новосибирска подвели итоги проверок в сфере исполнения законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Новосибирской области. 2015. 30 декабря.