Kadyrov against the federals: duel of powers

A duel in criminal cases between the law enforcement agencies of the Chechen Republic and almost all federal law enforcement agencies - the FSB, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Investigative Committee - after the murder of Boris Nemtsov, either erupted with an unprecedented force, or simply began to attract more media attention, which is more likely. The peculiarity of this disassembly is that, trying to put the enemy in place, all the power clans behave quite legitimately, but completely come out of the shores when they strive to protect themselves from oncoming claims.

Whatever you say about Ramzan Kadyrov and about the legal regime in Chechnya during his rule in particular, the Chechen Investigative Committee completely justifiably opened a criminal case against the Ministry of Internal Affairs from a neighboring region who staged a shooting in Grozny and killed the suspect, instead of arresting him and bringing it to the court. It would be, however, very well, if they were against the Chechen security officials, when they are engaged in the same in foreign territory - and, generally speaking, on their own, if Chechnya was considered the subject of the federation as part of Russia - each time there was, to whom to initiate a criminal case and carefully figure out how legitimate they behaved. And against any other security forces, throughout Russia.

The Chechen legal regime, no matter how strange it does not stand out against the all -Russian background

No, judge for yourself. Based on some expediency, Stavropol police officers, together with employees of the temporary operational group of bodies and units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, deployed in Khankala, which is directly subordinate to the federal Ministry of Internal Affairs and undoubtedly acts with the sanction of its top, among the day they arrange a firing on the streets of the Big City. Not in order to stop any ugliness that is no less dangerous to surrounding citizens, but planning, solving their own official problems: delaying-suppose a dangerous criminal. As a result, we have shooting on a crowded street, the task of detaining and delivering failure - if it was at all set and the attackers did not have a criminal intent, hiding behind “crusts”, and kill the accused on the spot. If this is not a reason for the criminal proceedings, then what is the reason? An extra prescription for an analgesic medicine prescribed by a compassionate doctor to a patient, an incorrectly decorated parental donation for school? For this in Russia is judged. Such a legal climate.

Here, of course, it must certainly be in somewitting patriot, habitually arguing that if some kind of muck is going on somewhere abroad, then in Russia it is certainly necessary to start the same. (A good and successful experience is suggested by some national traitors, and, for example, to give the Russian version of the Lynch court.) This patr. Will certainly remind you that in the notorious America, police shoot defeat without hesitation, and why they can, but we can’t. Indeed, in the United States, police officers have excessive freedom in the use of weapons. And it would be nice if each such fact has been conducted an attentive investigation. The surprise for the patriot is that this is exactly what happens every time. In the United States, there are so many powerful and independent security officials - from local to the federal FBI and prosecutors of various levels - not to mention politicians and the press, that every similar case falls under a microscope.

They can say that in Swara between the Chechen security officials and the federal for an impartial and fair trial, it is stupid to hope. This is true not only in relation to the subordinates of Ramzan Kadyrov.

Subscribe to read the whole

Make a subscription Redefine.media to read Republic

Subscribe [you can pay for a Russian or foreign card. The subscription is extended automatically. You can unsubscribe at any time.]

Where are the money subscribers going

Most Republic materials are available by paid subscription. We believe that this is a good way to finance media. After all, as you know, if you have not paid for reading it, then someone else paid for you to read it. In our case, everything is honest: from your money, salaries and fees are paid to journalists, and they write about important and interesting topics for you.

The key feature of our subscription: your money is distributed between Republic magazines depending on how you read it. If you read the materials of one magazine, then your money will go only to him, while others will not go. That is, you finance only what you are interested in.

Republic uses the Redefine.media subscription. For design, we will redirect you to the Redefine.media website, where you will need to register and pay for the subscription. Authorization on the Redefine.Media website will allow you to read Republic materials from the same device.

A year subscription is more profitable than a month. And if you want to unsubscribe, this can always be done in your personal account.