Translated material
Russia. Wednesday. Chronicle of prohibitions
Since the news feed today is replete with the signals of the authorities in the Saltykov style “I will not allow!”, We decided to collect the first from them in such a small digest. It turns out such a “funny” picture:
"Bitcoin will not pass!"
The Ministry of Finance has developed amendments to the Law "On the Central Bank", which prohibit the release and circulation of cryptocurrencies in Russia, write news. In addition, the agency has prepared amendments to the Code of Administrative Offenses, tightening sanctions for business for the release and turnover of virtual currencies. Interior companies in accordance with the bill of the Ministry of Finance face a fine of 3-5 million rubles or administrative suspension of activities for up to 90 days. The government will be submitting bills to the State Duma after interagency coordination. The Ministry of Economic Development, Rosfinmonitoring, lawyers and bankers supported the innovation. From the clarification of the Ministry of Finance of Article 27 of the Law "On the Central Bank" follows:
“The official monetary unit (currency) of the Russian Federation is the ruble. One ruble consists of 100 kopecks. The introduction of other monetary units on the territory of the Russian Federation and the production (issue) of property rights, including in electronic form, used as a means of payment and (or) exchange for funds and not directly provided for by federal law (hereinafter - monetary surrogates), as well as the implementation of operations using monetary surrogates. Objects of property rights that arise as a result of the fulfillment by the parties of obligations under civil law contracts and used in order to stimulate the acquisition of goods, works, services are not recognized as monetary surrogates.
Although there was a weak hope that they would still lag behind the bitcoins.
"For anonymous users of Wi-Fi, the cafe owners will be fined 200 thousand."
The administration of public places (cafes, libraries, schools, parks, etc.), where they give visitors to connect to Wi-Fi, are obliged to identify their users, otherwise they will be in a fine of up to 200 thousand rubles, stated in the new bill of the Ministry of Communications, which provides that the provision of Internet access in public places or individual entrepreneurs is allowed only under The condition that an agreement on the identification of users and the equipment used by them - phones, tablets, laptops, etc. will be concluded between them and the communication operators. According to the press service of the Ministry of Communications, this bill is already undergoing a coordination procedure.
"Latvians are not here!"
The Ministry of Communications did not allow the Russian in an office package with the Latvian roots "Ivolgapro" in the register, writes Raek . The Ministry of Communications refused to include in the register of Russian in a number of products “due to their components belonging to the third party-foreign manufacturers,” the regulator said in a statement. According to market participants, we are talking about the supplier of the cloud office solutions “New Communication Technologies” (NCT, Ivolgapro brand), which was connected with the Latvian Ascensio CIA (Onlyofice brand).
As follows from the message on the SCT website, in June 2015 the company's project was chosen by the Ministry of Communications and the Ministry of Communications as a decision on import substitution of infrastructure software in the user office software. In January of this year, the company sent an application for the inclusion of the Ivolgapro office package in the Russian software register.
"The head of the FAS accused Google of aggressive behavior"
The head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS) Igor Artemyev said that the Internet company Google, which the department recognized the violation of the law on the protection of competition, behaves aggressively. According to Artemyev:
“Google is expressed in such an aggressive form” in Russian and foreign media. In particular, we are talking about the statements that the FAS during the consideration of the Google case violated any procedures, he explained, adding that this is "a complete nonsense." Such a respected corporation could behave in the best traditions of contesting and protecting their rights and interests ”
The head of the Russian office Google Alla Zabrovskaya refused to comment.
In mid -September 2015, the FAS recognized Google and her “daughter” Google Ireland guilty of violating the competition of competition. The lawsuit of the Internet giant to the FAS court rejected the court.
Anton Nosik was questioned in the case of extremism.
Thiswas announced byNosik lawyer Sergei Badamshin. On October 1, the blogger published an article on bombing in Syria. In particular, Nosik wrote that he “warmly welcomes” Syria’s bombing by any forces. According to the nose, Syrian residents "receive what they voted for."
The Investigative Committee (SK) opened a criminal case under Part 1 of Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (arousal of hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity using the media). SK has already appointed three examinations of the publication of the nose. The first study was conducted by a specialist of the FSB FSB forensic Institute, which came to the conclusion that there are “extremist -orientation statements” in the post. ” The FSB expert discovered in the text the justification of violent acts regarding the Syrians. At the same time, a psychological linguistic examination did not see signs of excitement of hatred or enmity in the words of a blogger.
After that, a third examination was announced. It is she, as the investigation expects, should “put an end to the answer to the question of whether there are signs of the corpus delicti in the actions of my client,” said Badamshin.
If such a “hot” set is in the middle of the week, then what awaits us for its end?
Read also:
The Prosecutor General’s Office blocked Evgenia Kiselev on YouTube
Yandex - investors: "In Russia you risk it"
_____