Shit in a memorial service

Two unknown people attacked Julia Latynin. Vsevolod Chaplin served a memorial service for the dead defenders of the White House. These events happened almost simultaneously and the impression made partly similar and rather strong, therefore I would like to put them nearby. Thinking about the variety of ways of mockery of people and amazed at this diversity.

There are simple ways, but there are very, very complex ones.

Draw a shit, trace a journalist, drive up, throw, sit in a motorcycle, dump - this is a simple technique. Sightly, one might say. Children throw land in their sandboxes, and adults prefer feces. Nevertheless, if we are talking about a famous person, the result surpasses expectations and the message about the incident is in the top new. Passions boil, versions are advanced on the move, the police are looking for attackers.

Rids associated with the phenomenon of the Archpriest on the Garden Ring is also a lot, but these are other responses. There are almost no versions, but if we talk about feelings, then a random prevails. There is no need to look for Chaplin, he is worth it, and there’s nothing to judge. In the end, he, a priest of the Russian Orthodox Church, has the right to pronounce his prayers where he wishes and where they call, and he was called. Society was accomplished within the law, equal to the church and the Criminal Code. Do not dig.

In addition, simple technologies are mastered, as a rule, unpretentious people. If we talk about the performers, then these are probably mercenaries who don’t care who to throw poles at. The owner will change, indicate a different goal for them, and they will fir with the same accuracy of another journalist or politician who did not say a single bad word about Prigozhin, or about Sechin, nor about Erdogan. And he hit someone else. It is only clear that these will be customers of a special kind, with their exclusive ideas about polemic techniques.

It is known that Julia Leonidovna has many people offends in articles and oral speeches, but there are hardly among those who are looking for today the police, for example, are the figures of international human rights organizations. The circle of suspects is narrow, and this facilitates the search for attackers, who, however, will be difficult to find. Due to their simplicity.

Complex technologies are not clear on what. Well, it can be assumed that the talkative Ruslan Miroshnik, which has passed over a quarter century, the glorious path from the “rock on the barricades” to trustworthy Blacksteanism, led Chaplin to pray on behalf of some witty clerk from the Kremlin administration. However, the archpriest himself with the current authority, secular and church, conflict. His wild performances , mirroring the era, rather irritate the highest authorities than delight. President Putin, no matter how he thinks about himself there, will never speak out loud in that way that they can and should be killed disagreed.

On the contrary, Vladimir Vladimirovich, as everyone knows, is inclined to humanistic thoughts. Not a fact, he believes that it is necessary to kill. Ahead of time, even with the Patriarch, the archpriest should perceive such speeches with longing and bewilderment. But why is it impossible, if for the homeland, for King Ivan, for Stalin, for Putin?

In the video , where the enclosures in the carnival boorish manner bring him to the public, Chaplin appears to be a man offended to the core, but ready to endure the torment for his amazing faith. Offending the memory of the dead, he himself feels offended. “I have the right to see the future of Russia the way I see it,” the guest called by the Mirmoshnik repeats it many times, and it seems that he did not expect such an inexcriptive technique.

A clear provocateur, Chaplin (as opposed to Miroshnik) at these minutes, apparently, is just starting to guess about what exactly he is inappropriate here, on the anniversary of August and the murdered freedom, with his prayers. And we can only guess what has been happening to him in recent years and how to explain his cannibalic speeches and firmness in defending cannibalism. These guesses are sad.

Actually, that is the problem of recognizing complex plots - in their irrationality. Hamping shit throwers know what they are doing. And the one who, following his beloved heroes, geniuses of different times and more or less the same peoples, has lost touch with reality and praises the kings for murders, falls out of simple schemes. It is possible that Chaplin, who appeared on the panichid, wanted to show humanity and somehow, or something, rehabilitated, but remained not understood, and in his eyes, when he explains his rights, a reproach is read: why are you not recognizing me and not recognize for a person? The Miroshnik, standing next to him, yells at the audience, and it is clear what pleasure the scandal gives him, and the Archpriest is dull and immersed in depression. He even asks his friend to be silent, but he does not stand up for a long time, and Chaplin suffers.

Gloom is in his soul, and you can sympathize when not to see how he desecrates the memory of the dead guys. When not to realize that he was then called to abuse them. If it was not to distinguish simple ways to mock people from complex and those who mowing under hooligans, from cynics, whose meanness is aggravated by a mockery of the dead, which cannot answer.

And if you choose between gopniks and bastards, you should prefer the first, although they are criminals, and Chaplin with Miroshnik and other are not indifferent to the earthly court. Heavenly, apparently, is not afraid. Why aren't they afraid and aren't they in vain? I would like to believe that they are mistaken, and hope that they will understand this until it's too late.