
The Moscow City Court examined the arrest of the person involved in the “March 26” case Stanislav Zimovts secretly from the independent lawyer Svetlana Sidorkina. About this with reference to a lawyer reports by the OVD-Info.
On the court’s website, Sidorkina said, a meeting on April 26 considered on April 26 on the complaint of a winter house was not listed. Meanwhile, at 15 o’clock the card appeared ; It said that the hearings have already passed and the appeal decision was made. What is this decision, the lawyer is not known, the publication says.
Meanwhile, the Moscow Agency reports that the appeal instance confirmed the sending of the Politzek to the pre -trial detention center.
Sidorkina has a signed agreement on the representation of the interests of the winterbeat, and she submitted an application to the Investigative Committee on the entry into the case. Despite this, the department did not inform her of the meeting. On Monday, it was reported that the TFR still did not give a certain lawyer permission to meet with a winter house in a pre -trial detention center. As you might assume, it was also about Sidorkina.
Then it became known that the Zimovets is contained in the Moscow pre-trial detention center-2 Butyrka in the block for the accused under the articles of the Criminal Code, providing for life terms . Meanwhile, as follows from the card of the appeal considered on Wednesday, the Zimovtsu was imputed part 1 of Article 318 of the Criminal Code (the application of non -hazardous violence to a representative of the authorities), the sanction of which is only up to five years of the colony.
In this regard, fears were expressed that the Zimovtsu was already charged or prepared to be charged with Article 317 of the Criminal Code (an encroachment on the life of a law enforcement officer), which just implies the deadline up to a lifelong or death penalty. "Case of March 26" was originally aroused precisely under this article; Articles 318 and 213 (hooliganism) were added a little later .
On Wednesday, ATS-INFO reported that the members of the PMC twice were in Butyrka for a meeting with Zimovts, but both times did not find him in the cell. Once the FSINITS said that the Politzke was taken to a meeting in the Moscow City Court, the second time - that he was on investigative actions.
Zimovtsa is 32 years old. He is a visiting from Volgograd; In 2015 he graduated from the Volga Humanitarian Institute - a branch of the Volgograd University. Adheres to nationalist views. Signed for opposition publics, including the "artillery" Vyacheslav Maltsev.
On March 26, Zimovets was detained at an anti -corruption action in the center of Moscow. “While they raised it, Mamonovites drove well (so. - Ed.), But it was cool))),” he commented on the action in the description of his VK page. On the 28th, the winter road was fined under Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violation of the procedure for holding a public event).
The last time the oppositionist went to his VKontakte account early in the morning of March 30. Two days later, on April 1, the judge of the Basmanny District Court of Moscow Galina Grabovskaya (Demidovich) sent him to the pre -trial detention center until May 30.
The parents of the Zimovts in Volgograd was a search. His local police did not report the reason, noting only that the opposition was detained in connection with the action in Moscow. Parents of the Politzek began to call the metropolitan departments of the police, but they did not give any specific information there - instead, the security forces threatened them with criminal liability for giving false testimony.
According to the plot of the case, on March 26, near Pushkinskaya Square, Zimmovets threw a brick in the back of the security forces from the Russian Guard. After that, the investigation department says, he “disappeared into the crowd, changed into the purpose of conspiracy”, and then returned to the place of events with a traumatic gun, “continuing to provoke those present to illegal actions.”
As you might assume, Zimovets does not admit guilt. In any case, the TFR did not write a confession of the Politzekok. In the same way, he did not report a plead of guilt as a defendant Alexander Shpakov , who really rejects the prosecution. On the other hand, the department’s information about the confession of another accused - Yuri Kulia - was subsequently confirmed.