Give only the deadline

On Thursday, the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court reduced the deadlines for two defendants in the case of Chistopol Jamaat. According to the correspondent of the Faces, 41-year-old Jaudat Ganeyev, up to 5 years 9 months, was reduced by the term of part 3 of Article 222 of the Criminal Code (illegal turnover of weapons and ammunition by an organized group). Thus, he received in total 17 years 10 months of strict regime instead of 18. In addition, he has been appointed a year of restriction of freedom after leaving the colony.

The 39-year-old Marat Sabirov reduced to 5 years 9 months under Part 3 of Article 223 of the Criminal Code (illegal production of firearms by an organized group). In total, he will stay in prison for 23 years 10 months in a maximum security colony instead of 24 years according to the first sentence. Politsyk received two years of restrictions on freedom after liberation.

The sentences to the other defendants are left without change.

In addition, references to several examinations using a polygraph are excluded from the sentence.

The appeal hearings passed from Wednesday.

On March 23, the collegium of the Volga District Military Court (Samara) as part of Yuri Klutkov (chairman), Igor Nikolaev and Dmitry Sirota pronounced the verdict in the case. The process took place at the exit session in the premises of the Kazan garrison military court.

23 years old was given to 34-year-old Rafael Zaripov. Sabirov and Zaripov, along with the killed in May 2014, were declared the founders and leaders of the group.

54-year-old Ramil Abitov and 39-year-old Ayrat Sitdikov received 19 years, 37-year-old Almaz Galeev-18 years old, 30-year-old Ruslan Gafurov-17 years old, 26-year-old Mikhail Martyanov and 30-year-old Stanislav Trofimchik-16 years old.

The case of Chistopol Jamaat is the most high -profile case of terrorism, considered in Tataria over the past 10 years. As the Mediazone clarifies , in the case of 80 volumes, and the indictment has 3219 pages.

The defendants, depending on the imputed role, were announced guilty of part 1 of Article 210 (creation of a criminal community), part 1 of Article 205.4 (creation of a terrorist community), part 1 of Article 205.5 (organization of the terrorist organization), paragraphs "A" of parts 2, 3 of Article 205 (attacks with an encroachment on the storage facilities of hazardous chemicals committed by an organized group), part 3 of article 22222222222222222222222 , Part 3 of Article 223, paragraphs “A”, “B” of part 2 of Article 171 (illegal entrepreneurship as part of an organized group with the extraction of income on an especially large amount) and paragraph “A” of part 4 of Article 174.1 of the Criminal Code (mockery of money received by a criminal way as part of an organized group).

In addition to other accusations, Gafurov also incriminated part 1 of Article 205.2 (public calls for terrorism and its public justification), part 2 of Article 282.2 (participation in the activities of an extremist organization) and paragraph "in" Part 2 of Article 282 of the Code (excitement of hatred or enmity as part of an organized group) for publications in Vkontakte. It was claimed that he promoted the views of Hizb Ut-Tahrir. However, the judges removed these accusations from him.

According to "Mediazons", part 1 of Article 30 - Part 1 of Article 205.2 (preparation for public justification of terrorism) was also charged with Ganeyev. It was claimed that he wrote some leaflets, which he did not have time to publish. Along with this, Ganeyev was charged with financing of terrorism. According to in the case, he transferred 80 thousand rubles to Mungaleev for two years.

Also against Ganeyev, the case was discovered about the deliberately false denunciation of the TSPE operatives, whom he accused of torture. The same accusation was imputed by the trophyr who, in the process of convicted in 2013 in another case, Alfred Akhmadullin and Azat Valishin said that he had given false testimonies for them during the investigation. As far as you can conclude, these accusations against Ganeev and Trofimchik were not considered as part of the finished trial.

According to the plot of the case, the Chistopol Jamaat was formed "from 2012 to August 2013." There are five episodes qualified as terrorist attacks. This is shelling by home-made reactive shells of the Nizhnekamskneftekhim plant on November 15, 2013, as well as allegedly committed in October-November of the same year of the arson of the built Orthodox Church, Sergius of Radonezh in Chistopol, the chapel was bought in the name of Dimitri Solunsky near the village of Lenoshminsky District of Tataria, the Military House in the name of the same saint in the village and Bombing bombs in the village of Bialask Alekseevsky district of Tataria.

Sabirov and Zaripov, since they were declared the organizers of the group, charged involvement in all five terrorist attacks. Another six was charged with participation in at least one of the attacks. Not a single terrorist attack was only of accusing Ganeyev.

Most of the arrests in the case of Chistopol Jamaattook place in November - December 2013 . Only Ganeyev hit the pre-trial detention center in April 2014. The cruel torture was reported, which the defendants are subjected to IVS Nizhnekamsk .

At the same time, it is known that all those accused of the case are adherents of the Hanafite Mazhab traditional for Tataria, and not radical Islam. It was also noted that most of the defendants were previously held accountable for charges of criminal offenses that were not related to terrorism or extremism. Only Abitov, Ganeyev and Martyanov had no problems with the law.

In total, more than two dozen people were arrested in the Purepol Jamaat case, but the materials in relation to most accused were allocated from the main case in certain proceedings. It was reported that 13 members of the group have already been convicted. It is known about the sentences by the six of them. At different times, from November 2014 to May 2016, they received punishments from a fine to16 years of maximum security .

As the Bashkir human rights activist Almir Zhukova, representing the interests of Zaripova, is built on the testimony of three defendants received under torture: Raisa Shaidullin, Daniil Mukhlisov and Emil Gizatullin. The affairs of each of them were allocated in separate proceedings. Shaidullin received 11 years of strict regime , Muhlis - 5 years of strict regime , Gizatullin - 6 years in general.

It is known that Zaripov, as a result of beatings, received a rupture of the walls of the bladder and a fracture of the spose bone of the 11th vertebra. The media also reported that Galeev was cut off the penis. At the same time, the first deputy chief of the Nizhnekamsk city department of the Investigative Committee of Ravil Ismagilov stated that Galeev himself cut off the member with a blade from a razor machine, which he found in the IVS chamber. In court, the accused confirmed the words of Ismagilov, explaining that he wanted to get to the hospital, since he was beaten in the IVS.

Meanwhile, it is known that earlier Galeev was convicted of rape and violent acts of a sexual nature, combined with the threat of murder and entailed infection with a sexually transmitted disease.

Hearing on the meritscontinued on October 20, 2016. From November 1, they were held closed at the request of the Kropotov prosecutor. The official referred to the fact that one of the witnesses in the case announced fears for her life in connection with the pressure allegedly provided by the relatives of the defendants. This witness was Gulnara Mingaleev, the wife of the murdered Rais Mingaleyev, previously convicted of the case of Chistopol Jamaat.

The defendant Trofimchik was removed from the courtroom until the performance with the last word after two suicide attempts taken during the preliminary hearings and at the first meeting on the merits. It was reported that this was exactly what he achieved by his actions, because earlier he testified to other accused under torture and now did not want to be with them at the trial.

After the announcement of the indictment, all eight defendants present in the hall refused to admit guilt in terrorism. The Trofimchik, questioned on March 6, according to the video from the pre -trial detention center, also stated that he had not committed any crimes, and gave all the testimonies to himself and other defendants under torture.

Sabirov and Sitdikov pleaded guilty only in illegal entrepreneurship, saying that they really kept a scrap metal point in cleaning, having no necessary license. Ganeyev found himself guilty of storing weapons.

A number of witnesses interrogated in the process abandoned the testimony given at the investigation, explaining that they were forced to stipulate the accused threats. However, the classified witnesses confirmed their testimonies. According to Zhukova and lawyer Boris Maslov, who protects Sabirov, these are persons who, in exchange for the necessary investigation, promised to mitigate the prosecution or completely release from criminal prosecution.

Zhukova noted that, according to Zaripov, Shiites could also be among the classified witnesses. When Tajik Bihishti Kadirov began to preach in two mosques of Chistopol Shiism, this caused indignation among local Muslims. Then Sabirov, Zaripov and several other future defendants went to the mufti of the region, and he forbade the Shiites to preach. As Zhukova said, her principal does not exclude that Kadirov’s supporters decided to avenge the defendants in the case with their testimonies.