"It is necessary to narrow the range of freedom of speech!" Results of the week with Russian television propaganda

Every Sunday, the first channel and TV channel “Russia” in the programs of Kiselev and Solovyov brings to the viewers the summons of the presidential administration (Read more about the control of the AP on television in the material “ Modern History of the Russian Policy, told in SMS ”). It is important to navigate in this agenda for understanding the logic of the Kremlin, but viewing these programs is fraught with mental suffering (and in some cases a psychiatric nature), in connection with which the Insider will save readers from this necessity: every Monday we will publish key excerpts from these programs. This time, Dmitry Kiselev will determine the boundaries of freedom of speech, and Vladimir Solovyov and the company will discuss the arms race with America, Ukrainian autocephaly and much more.

“What nationalism is suitable for Russia, and how does it differ from the cave? This is me, Dmitry Kiselev, "News of the Week."

I wonder if he will be able to find ten differences.

Having illuminated the massacre in Kerch, Kiselev reports: “In addition to terrorism, unconditional risks bear the approach of NATO to our borders and the US Wild Military Budget. But even in these conditions, Russia feels confident. ”

Kiselev continues: "The American Air Force in Syria act not only inefficiently, but also sloppy."

About nationalism - it turns out that Putin is the most correct nationalist. Putin himself said so.

Before the advertising pause, Kiselev temporarily announces the following plots: "Who is he - the Black Patriarch Filaret?"

The report “Vesti of the Week” about Putin’s visit to Uzbekistan is stylistically withstanding the best Soviet traditions: “Alai bazaar saturated with a sweet aroma and oriental color is an unchanging supplier of all the freshest: both fruits and news. Each shelter has only conversations in each teahouse that the nuclear power plant, which Russia and Uzbekistan will build together. ”

Talking about the scandal around the film “Holiday”, Kiselev brings a theoretical base under the discussion: “Alexey Krasovsky claims that he read books and documents on the blockade, but he still invented the plot design for his comedy. “My film is artistic. I invented everything. And I hope that I have the right to this in our country. Otherwise, let's speak frankly that there is censorship in our country ... ”Krasovsky noted. As for me, it sounds even somewhat infantile. I will explain why. The artist is always a person addressing the inner world of other people. The highest goal for him is to influence this world, change it. This is power. But not administrative, but spiritual. And the real master of reflection on his own always arises ... not about censorship, as we see, speech. There is no censorship. But there are prohibitions, as elsewhere in the world. ”

Kiselev "About laughter from the abyss"

And now a little story: “In Smolny were the Leningrad Regional Committee and the City Committee of the CPSU (b) - the actual headquarters of the defense of the blockade megalopolis ... It is clear that Goebbels propaganda with an angry told how everyone was burning in Smolny, while the townspeople hasten from hunger. Actually, this was the content of fascist leaflets, poured by aircraft to the blockade Leningrad. The same motive is now reproduced by the director Krasovsky, who "invented" everything.

And further: “I am to the fact that in the blockade people in the millionaire city, of course, lived differently. But the dominant is still suffering and death. Courage and unprecedented feat. Was there crime? Yes, it was. Was there an inequality? Yes, there was also inequality. But not to the comedy certainly! The wrong context. The invented comedy for this context distorts the proportion of perception of the blockade. This is an attempt to make the main secondary. End, get, chop, grind and devalue a huge mass feat. And this is a really prohibited reception. Censorship? No. The ban - yes. Is it possible to publish everything? It is forbidden! There are prohibitions in Russia, as in any country in the world. They exist. "

Kiselev: “At a meeting with cultural figures, Vladimir Putin addressed them with a direct request to develop the criteria for the possible and unacceptable in art. I must say, it was an elegant move. I am sure that Putin certainly represents these criteria for himself, but if he formulated the rules for artists, Putin, then the artists themselves would accuse him of dictatorship, totalitarianism, a clamp of freedom and further everywhere. But Putin is quite a sporting nobly gives the right to submit the very creative intelligentsia: “You know, there is always a very subtle line between what I called a dangerous shocking and freedom of creativity. These criteria must be developed in a creative environment. It’s not an easy task, but it would be very good if it weren’t for us, but you could do it ... ”Everything hung on that. Putin never waited for our creative intelligentsia. ”

Well, what will you do with them? The president asks them to come up with a clamp for himself - and they are not in any. So the authorities have to work.

And finally, Kiselev closes the topic of censorship: “It is much more important to narrow the range of freedom of speech in Russia. Or even wider - the range of freedom of expression ... I understand that now everything will get out and seize on the word “narrow”, but in Russia, in Russia, the range of freedom of speech is really wider than in any country in the world. Right along Dostoevsky: "The abyss below and the abyss above." And “narrow”, in fact, Fyodor Mikhailovich suggested: “The Russian person is wide. I would narrow. " Agree, it’s still relevant. ”

The plot about the film “Holiday” continues: “Those who are trying to prove the theory of the fatty of the elites in the blockade Leningrad are most often given as an example of the photograph that were taken by the TASS correspondent Alexander Mikhailov. The annotation reads: “Comrade Abakumov checks the quality of baking of Viennese products. Date: December 12, 1941. Blockade Leningrad. " This really does not fit in the head: what rum women, when people die from exhaustion?! So the myth was born that the cakes were made for Smolny and personally Zhdanov. But if you turn to the documents, it turns out: the pictures were taken and published in order to show both the country and the enemy that Leningrad is alive, he does not give up. ”

Needless to say, a good way to show that Leningrad does not give up. Especially the inhabitants of the city of Rada would be to see this.

Kiselev reproachfully says that the organizers of the protest rally in Magas did not even show its participants a map of a new demarcation with Chechnya - but it shows that the territory of Ingushetia as a result of this demarcation only increased.

Kiselev about the conflict due to Ukrainian autocephaly: “More than others rejoice in America. Yes, it is understandable. The US ears stick out behind all this. The US Secretary is hypocritically called for progress in Ukraine, as he put it "in the spirit of religious freedom." Interestingly, the Kiev Metropolis was on the canonical territory of the Moscow Patriarchate almost a hundred years before the appearance of the United States as such. ”

It is not clear how the last detail is interesting, and most importantly, what does it have to the case.

Vladimir Solovyov. "Moscow. Kremlin. Putin "

Vladimir Soloviev in the program "Moscow. Kremlin. Putin": “After the president’s statements at the Valdai Forum, some began to ask: what, Putin wants to destroy all civilized humanity? But Putin did not talk about civilized humanity, but about the aggressor. So you need to understand correctly: we will go to heaven, and the aggressors will die! ”

Sunday evening at Solovyov

The Solovievsky evening began. The first topic is Trump's intention to withdraw from an agreement on medium and lower -range missiles. Soloviev: "I do not understand-if they can leave the contract at any time, how can you agree with them at all?" (Applause) Actually, each international treaty contains a mechanism for leaving it. Soloviev, apparently, is not aware.

Igor Korotchenko, editor -in -chief of the National Defense magazine (hotly): “We can deliver such a blow that there will be no UK! And if some hope to sit out behind the ocean, then they will not be settled! But we do not need it! We must fight for the world! "

The muddy Israeli “public figure” Yakov Kedmi (firmly): “Russia has the opportunity if the enemy sends rockets to it, deliver such a blow to him that will amaze him even before his missiles reached the territory of Russia.”

Soloviev (screams): “Here the Saudi journalist was dismembered - and nothing, from America no sanctions! Everything can! " Nikolai Zlobin (carefully): "And from Russia?" Soloviev (indignant): "And Russia has to do with it?"

Soloviev (weightily): “Russia will never win in the arms race while it will sit on the dollar. You cannot successfully lead the race if your economy depends on the potential enemy. ”

You yourself have not seen any money except rubles.

Political scientist Dmitry Nekrasov says that today's Russia is not the USSR and it is not necessary to get involved in confrontation with America. Soloviev (angrily and sarcastically): “What do you propose? Give Crimea? Give Japan to the island? Refuse nuclear weapons? To give Ukraine more Kuban? Give Abkhazia and Ossetia for gobbing? .. (Satisfied.) I love liberals to take clean water! ”

Brutal Evgeny Satanovsky is connected to a dispute with Nekrasov: “You have already deserved yourself a shooting on the first day (apparently, warp up! Close your mouth, do not bring me to a serious face! I say quite seriously! "

Igor Korotchenko: “The best guarantee from the Third World War is strategic nuclear forces that will put an end to the historical development of any country that dares to attack us ... We must behave more rigidly. The Americans will come out of the RSMD - it is necessary to distribute Russian passports to the residents of Donbass! And so that the Caliber flew to the window of any Ukrainian headquarters where they plan provocations! .. and inside the country too. And that is, such a radio station that throws mud on state money into the state ... This is the same tolerance that, under Gorbachev, brought the Soviet Union to the collapse. ”

Yakov Kedmi: “The purpose of the United States since 1945 is one - to destroy Russia (earlier - the Soviet Union). But they never knew the war on their territory, and they are mortally afraid of it. They will not even endure one bomb. The Russian strategy should be built on this - so that they understand that they will follow a blow to their territory (they do not care about the UK or Poland). Then they will never go to war. ”

Senator Alexei Kondratyev (with bitterness): “That's what happened in 1987? They began to disarm - and immediately problems in the economy began. "

In the meantime, there were no problems.

Soloviev, penetrately addresses the Westerner Dmitry Nekrasov: “Do you know anything for sure? What do you have besides a passionate desire to betray your country? "

Moving to the Ukrainian topic, Soloviev reports: “According to the media, the Patriarchate of Constantinople received $ 25 million for his schismatic activity.”

Ukrainian guest Vadim Trukhan: "The aggression of Russia against Ukraine has been convicted at the UN level." But Soloviev is a thin connoisseur of international law: “At the UN level, it only matters that the Security Council accepts - and there is no resolution!”

Well, yes, you can not pay attention to the General Assembly.

“But who is such a Patriarch of Constantinople? - argues Konstantin Zatulin. - What, is there such a city of Constantinople? He has not been since 1453. And they have no rights since then. ”

The connoisseur of history did not take into account the fact that in this case the transfer of the Kyiv metropolis to the Moscow Patriarchate in 1686 also has no strength.

Former deputy of the Rada Elena Bondarenko (with passion): “We sold our national sovereignty! Some kind of Pompeo, some kind of walker something to me, Ukrainian, explains about my faith! Who are they? So the colonialists behave! "

It's funny to listen to the speeches of the Ukrainian patriots on Russian state television.

Political scientist Sergei Mikheev (choked): “I do not want to speculate on the tragedy in Kerch: but look how many condolences are sent to Moscow, which means that Crimea is recognized as Russian!”

Soloviev interrogates the Ukrainian Tryhan: "Why is America friends with you?" Tryukhan: "Because it does not want the revival of the Soviet Empire." Soloviev (in surprise): "Why doesn't you want?" Tryukhan: "Why is she an opponent?" Soloviev (even more surprised): “But is Russia an opponent America? She's far! "

Sergey Mikheev (feverishly): “I think we are not enough for Ukraine more active offensive policy! (Tryukhan.) You say that Russia has stolen the land from you? And I believe that Russia has stolen Ukraine! Your place in Poltava in the market - and everything else you stole! ”

Sergey Kurginyan (with animation): “Russia goes to the loneliness strategy - and this is great! This is the key to victory! "