Activists of the Association of Popular Resistance (PRES) are systematically brought to administrative responsibility for their public actions. We collect all the cases of their persecution known to us in one list.
• Nikita Zaitsev (press secretary of the ANS):
- On March 4, in Moscow, the Nikulinsky District Court fined him 15 thousand rubles under Part 5 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violation of the rules for holding a public event) - the activist appeals the court decision. His administrative case is related to a picket in support of the anarchist Azat Miftakhov on the territory of Moscow State University, during which he and several other people were detained.
• Daniil Latyshev (former member of the ANS) - on May 25 he was brought to justice under Part 8 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (repeated violation of the rules for holding a public event). His case is related to the action on January 30 this year. As part of it, activists of the ANS and “Unlimited Protest” marched along Tverskaya Street with a banner “Freedom of Peaceful Assembly”, chanting the slogans: “The President is overdue - the protest is indefinite” and “For your and our freedom.”
• Liliya Osipova:
-On January 28, the Presnensky District Court fined her 100 thousand rubles under Part 8 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (the activist is appealing the court ruling). Her case is related to the action against the demolition of the Moscow Nightingale cinema. During the campaign to protect the cinema, some activists gathered for a rally near its building, and others blocked Novinsky Boulevard, walking along it with the banner “The Solovey must go on.”
• Nester Chertilov (former member of the ANS) - on March 5 in Tula, employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs detained him in connection with “forbidden symbols”, which the activist, according to them, published on VKontakte. Chertilov himself said that during the arrest, officers questioned him about the “Hands Off the Russian Kuriles” action that took place on February 7, and demanded to name the names of the activists who took part in it. During this action, the ANS hung a banner on one of the bridges on Lenin Avenue in Tula, over the M-2 highway above the Kaluga highway.
• Maria Nekrasova - On February 27, the Preobrazhensky District Court fined her 15 thousand rubles under Part 6.1 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (participation in an unauthorized picket that resulted in interference with transport infrastructure). Her administrative case is related to the “For Free Internet” action, which ANS activists held in Moscow, in Sokolniki, on February 15. During the action, about a dozen young people came out onto the roadway with flares, an ANS flag and a banner “Resign the State Duma,” as a result of which they blocked traffic.
• Anastasia Zinovkina (Nastya Topor) - On February 26, the Preobrazhensky District Court arrested her for 7 days under Part 8 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (repeated violation of the rules for holding a public event). Her case is also connected with the action in Sokolniki.
• Alexander Buimov - On February 20, the Preobrazhensky District Court arrested him for 20 days under Part 8 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (the activist appeals the court decision). His case is also connected with the action in Sokolniki. According to media reports, several members of the movement live in the apartment in which Buimov was detained. It was from there that the Ministry of Internal Affairs officers took Zinovkina to the police station. On March 2, the ANS held a rally in support of the arrested Zinovkina and Buimov . During this action, four activists with banners and flares came to the intersection of two streets in the Mayakovskaya metro area and traditionally tried to block the traffic.
• Igor Safonov - On January 28, the Presnensky District Court fined him 100 thousand rubles under Part 8 of Art. 20.2 Code of Administrative Offences. His case is also connected with the action against the demolition of the Nightingale.
Sources