Translated material
The drum rotates. Olga Romanova about what will happen after the recognition of the FBK extremists
The drum rotates. Olga Romanova about what will happen after the recognition of the FBK extremists
19 April 2021Olga Romanova
The Moscow prosecutor’s office demands to recognize the FBK and other organizations associated with Alexei Navalny, extremist. Olga Romanova, Director of the Rus Sitting Rus, says that in Russia there is with people whom the state considers extremists.
Once upon a time there was a good boy in the city of Tver, just graduated from school. The son of refugees from Azerbaijan Nurlan Gadzhiev, a citizen of the Russian Federation. His Tverskaya fellow countryman fell ill and went to undergo surgery to Turkey. Nurlan had a Sberbank card, and he transferred 2 (two) thousand rubles to his friend’s wife in a friend. Two years later, he received five years of strict regime for this. The “sitting Rus'” defended him, but we could not do anything.
The second story is much more well -known. Dennis Citizen Citizen Krostansen has lived in Russia since 2000. He worked in Orel with a carpenter, professed the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses, like his parents in Copenhagen. Two years ago I received for this for 6 years.
These two stories are from the current judicial practice. Legal scientists can say one thing, and the current practice can be completely different. The same will be with the FBK and other organizations about the beautiful Russia of the future - participants or by passing by the not good hour citizens will be judged as they want, and not based on legal logic. Here, too, the most important principle of the work of Russian justice will work, better known as "the law that is drawn up."
People will judge as they want, and not based on legal logic
The first story is about Nurlan - this is about financing and donates. The second is about membership in an extremist organization. We will analyze them in a little more detail.
Nurlan was convicted of financing the organization banned in Russia - ISIS. However, he transferred money from Sberblon to Sber, from his account to the citizen Lebedeva, who looked after her husband after surgery in Turkey.
Nurlan Gadzhiev
The investigation assured that this was the wrong citizen, she then left for Syria. But then. Another important detail: Nurlan made a translation in July 2014, and ISIS was declared an organization banned in Russia in December 2014. So what, that he did not know about Lebedeva’s plans, much less about the plans of the prosecutor's office to ban ISIS. Nurlan did not see any connection between ISIS and citizen Lebedeva, and if he had seen, the act was committed before the ban on ISIS. By the way, the criminal case against Nurlan was brought up only in 2016. When the reporting on the struggle was needed.
Of course, an attentive reader will immediately show me inconsistencies: ISIS is an organization banned in Russia, and FBK & Co is just extremist. And then not yet, but they will, there is no doubt.
Here I have a shah and mat, of course. I completely agree that I am twisting here: the verdict will not write “financing of terrorism”, but “financing of extremism”, and five years will not be in strict mode, but in general.
The verdict will not write “financing of terrorism”, but “financing of extremism”, and five years will not be in strict mode, but in general
The law has no retroactive force? And Nurlan had. And the verdict resisted all instances. They do not transplant everyone, who was given to Navalny? Not everyone. Only who needs it and who is unlucky, like Nurlan. This is about the donates. Now about membership in an organization recognized as extremist - as Jehovah's Witnesses. Moreover, I remind you, these are purely peaceful citizens and generally outside politics. And even Putin called the banner of the witnesses nonsense.
Well, called and called it. Since then, 463 believers have fallen under criminal prosecution. For Dennis Kristensen, everyone who could, all sorts of excellent organizations, including international ones, but he sits, mainly in a schizo. To date, almost eight dozen followers of witnesses are deprived of freedom.
Danish "extremist" - preacher Dennis Krostansen
Why are they recognized as extremists? And therefore. And not only them.
Articles on the topic
Witnesses and shackles. How they pursue and torture Jehovists in Russia
In 2016, the Supreme Court of Crimea recognized the Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people as extremist, and under the threat of criminal prosecution after the ban was 2.5 thousand people - activists and members of regional medzhisis. They are also pursued, block accounts, initiate criminal cases. And they did not make films about the Putin palaces and spas-Salons, did not take people to the streets, did not drown for a smart vote.
Not only membership in organizations and not only donates will fall under the ban. A demonstration of the symbols of the FBK and other Navalny organizations will be equated with a demonstration of fascist swastika. And here a very subtle matter will begin.
What does the law tell us? The law establishes administrative responsibility for the demonstration of symbols (Article 20.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses, including administrative arrest of up to 15 days, which, of course, kindergarten for today). People can be held accountable, including for past posts with the symbols of an extremist organization (10-year and more ago). This means that if you ever reposted the FBK video, then leave for 15 days.
If you ever reposted the FBK video, then leave for 15 days
Well, serve. You will be protected by good lawyers, but you are likely to serve - if you suddenly need to report or in order to hold you in a special -reception for another purpose - for example, to detain and think what to do with you next. Or, for example, recruit, it happens too. Let's proceed from the fact that you will not be recruited, or you will not recover, and 15 days are not 15 years old.
A lot of interesting things are provided there, such as entering the Rosfinmonitoring list. It is worth saying about this separately, this is an extremely unpleasant thing. This is completely called "a list of organizations and individuals in respect of which there is information about their involvement in extremist activity and terrorism." Now there are almost 11 thousand names. Everyone who is suspected or accused of any articles related to extremism or terrorism, as well as those who have served on them. Your accounts in banks will be blocked, and not only in banks, in PayPal, for example, too. The court decisions about getting into the list are not needed. You just hit it. And this is a long time. If you stay free, then you will sue for a long time for the exception of the list. Accordingly, you will be unemployed.
What should be done with all this? I would like to answer: you should live, sew sundresses and light dresses from the sitz. But no. Thousands, tens of thousands of people live with this in the territory of the Russian Federation. You won’t want anyone to live like that, but they live. You can, of course, fall into despair, but you can’t help this matter. You should sue, after losing to sue again, after failures we should sue again and switch to the level of the ECHR, while we are still in the Council of Europe. Belarusians, for example, cannot - they are not there, for them the ECHR is closed.
For those who want to be careful, you should be careful. For those who want to go the other way, by struggle, no matter what, you should go through the struggle no matter what is ready for everything.
For those who do not want to be a random victim - well, how lucky. I think that approximately 99.999% of Russia's residents do not want to be a random victim, but the drum is already rotating. He never stops at all.
However, there is a nuance. People and organizations are different about random victims and “ideological”. And the deadlines, in general, are the same. No, I'm not calling. I just look at judicial practice.