Although the Russian business hopes to bypass sanctions with the help of cryptocurrencies, in reality this is impossible on any significant scale, Moody's analysts say (the reports of the report set out RBC). The main reasons are three:
Control can be avoided if you use mechanisms for concealing the parts of cryptotrazacia and work only through decentralized exchangers, recognizes Moody's. But again, this sector is too weak to massage the business.
The Ministry of Finance before the “special operation” was ready to allow cryptocurrencies as an investment with significant restrictions for investors. After it began, the Federal Tax Service (but only through cryptocurrencies), and part of the business on the RSPP site, spoke for the legalization of export-import operations in cryptocurrency-even for the purchase, sale and exchange of cryptocurrencies by legal entities.
Discussions about the regulation of the cryptocurrency market in Russia are ongoing, and the agency’s report is another argument in favor of the Central Bank, which continues to advocate their complete ban (the argumentation of The Bell regulator was disassembled here ). Meanwhile, the space of maneuver for large Russian investments abroad continues to contract - for example, since May Russians are retroactively prohibited family trusts in the EU.
The sanctions imposed after the start of events in Ukraine dealt a heavy blow to Russian charitable funds and their wards. Foreign donors can no longer transfer money to Russia, the business suspended or closed charitable programs, many private donors are forced to save or left the country. At the same time, there are more and more people who need help.
On a special broadcast on the Bell.club Live channel, we will try to figure out what future is now waiting for the sphere of charity in Russia and how to help.
We discuss:
Speakers:
Moderator: Natalya Kaminarskaya, director of the Blagosphere Center.
Ukraine requested and received from the United States intelligence on the whereabouts of the Russian missile cruiser Moscow and the confirmation that it was Moscow, before the death of the ship, recognized CNN. The Russian Ministry of Defense reported only a fire on a cruiser with a detonation of ammunition. The Pentagon representative John Kirby said that the information provided was not a target designation, the US military did not know about the "intention of Ukraine to attack the ship" and was not involved in the decision -making process.
Kirby also said that the United States did not provide Ukraine with information about the location of the command of the Russian Armed Forces. On the eve of The New York Times wrote that it was the US data that allowed the Ukrainian side to purposefully attack the Russian headquarters.
Both episodes “raise the issue of the Red lines of Russia in the field of military support of Ukraine by the United States”, CNN indicates. At the end of April, Financial Times wrote that the death of “Moscow” was furious President Putin, and he lost interest in the diplomatic settlement of the conflict with Ukraine.
Important update! Now you can support The Bell, even if you are not in Russia, from a foreign bank card or from your PayPal account.
The war completely changed our life. About its consequences for each of us, we write online from February 24. We never took money for content from readers, believing that we can earn our own. Our income was formed due to advertising, events Bell.club and educational programs in School. But now this business model, like much more in the economy, has collapsed.
In today's situation, we fundamentally do not want to make our daily newsletters and the site paid, since we believe that the value of unbiased information is now great than ever. But to continue the work, The Bell needs your participation.