The deputies adopted the amendments to the Criminal Code in the first reading. The bill will be finalized by the second reading.
On June 14, 2022, the State Duma adopted in the first reading a bill to amend the Criminal and Criminal Procedure Codes. It provides for changes in legislation in the field of state security. The bill was submitted to the State Duma on May 25 by deputies Vasily Piskarev, Ernest Valeev, Andrey Kartapolov, Andrey Krasov and Anatoly Vyborny.
The deputies proposed the following amendments to the Criminal Code:
Under part 3, the acts provided for by the first two parts, committed by an organized group or with the threat of violence, it is proposed to establish a punishment in the form of imprisonment for a term of five to seven years with a fine in the amount of 500 thousand to 2.5 million rubles or in the amount of income for a period of three to five years, with or without restriction of liberty for a period of six months to two years, and with deprivation of the right hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for up to fifteen years or without it;
effect of Art. 284.1 of the Criminal Code extend to participation in the activities of "undesirable organizations", their financing and organization of activities not only in Russia, but also in any other territories;
According to the amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure, to investigate cases under the new Art. 208.4 of the Criminal Code will be able to both the investigators of the IC and the FSB, and under the new art. 275.1 of the Criminal Code - only the FSB. Consider cases under Part 3 of Art. 208, Art. 208.4 and 275 of the Criminal Code will have to be the courts of the subjects of the federation.
The Russian government made a number of comments in its response. Firstly, the government noted that for Art. 275.1 of the Criminal Code, it is necessary to clarify the range of a possible term of punishment in the form of imprisonment, taking into account the fact that the crime infringes on the foundations of the constitutional order and the security of the state and is serious. Secondly, from the point of view of the government in Part 3 of Art. 280.4 unreasonably included a qualifying sign of the commission of a crime with the threat of violence. Thirdly, it is noted that for hh. 1 and 2 Art. 359 of the Criminal Code mistakenly offers the same lower thresholds of punishment.
The government also emphasized that the draft law contains evaluative and not formally defined terms, in particular, "timely", "adversary" and "activities directed against the security of the Russian Federation", "which does not meet the constitutional requirements of clarity, certainty and unambiguity of legal norms" . In addition, the authors of the review noted that for a foreign citizen prosecuted for espionage, the country to which he transmits information is not an adversary.
The Supreme Court of Russia had no conceptual comments on the bill.
The legal department of the State Duma, which studied the bill for the first reading, pointed out a number of its problems. Firstly, the department noted that the addition to the title of Article 208 "Organization of an illegal armed formation or participation in it" with the words "either in an armed conflict or hostilities" does not correspond to the proposed disposition of the new part 3 of this article. Secondly, according to the authors of the conclusion, the new art. 280.4 of the Criminal Code will compete with Art. 280 of the Criminal Code (public calls for extremist activity), since extremism also includes obstruction of the lawful activities of state bodies, election commissions, organizations, combined with violence or the threat of its use. Thirdly, the department recommended excluding from the list of crimes, in the absence of signs of which liability would arise under Article 280.4 of the Criminal Code, a reference to Art. 205 of the Criminal Code (terrorism), as it does not intersect with the new norm. At the same time, it was proposed to include Part 3 of Art. 212 of the Criminal Code (responsibility for calls for riots accompanied by violence). Finally, following the government, the legal department of the State Duma noted that the qualifying sign of making calls with the threat of violence "is not typical for this kind of crime and is not contained in any of the similar structures" (Articles 205.2, 280, 280.1, 280.3, 354 UK), as well as that for hh. 1 and 2 Art. 359 of the Criminal Code should not offer the same lower thresholds of punishment.
Irina Pankina, co-rapporteur on the project, noted in her speech that the State Construction Committee supported the concept of the draft law, but drew attention to the need to refine it. 14 days are allotted for submission of amendments. Sources