The reason for the prosecution of Vasily Bolshakov was a post and comments on VKontakte.
On February 14, 2023, Vasily Bolshakov, a resident of Kasimov, Ryazan region, was searched as part of a criminal investigation under Part 1 of Art. 280.3 of the Criminal Code (public actions aimed at discrediting the armed forces , committed after bringing to administrative responsibility). According to Bolshakov's wife, during the search he was handcuffed and beaten.
The reason for the prosecution was a post that Bolshakov published on VKontakte on November 9, 2022. It contained an anecdote about the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kherson.
On April 3, 2023, it became known that another case was opened against Bolshakov under the same article. This time, the investigation saw discrediting of the armed forces in the comments that Bolshakov left on September 22, 2022 under a post by another user on VKontakte. In them, he spoke out against the special military operation and called for sabotaging the mobilization. The investigator made Bolshakov oblige to appear.
Earlier, in July 2022, Bolshakov was fined 30 thousand rubles under Art. 20.3.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses on discrediting the use of the army and the activities of Russian officials abroad due to a comment on VKontakte. The court decision said that the comment contained “a negative assessment of the actions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to conduct a military special operation on the territory of Ukraine, which characterizes these actions as fascist, associated with genocide (aimed at destroying the people of Ukraine).”
From our point of view, the introduction into legislation of a ban on discrediting the actions of the Russian armed forces and government agencies abroad was an unjustified restriction of the right to freedom of expression, designed to suppress criticism of the political course of the authorities. Therefore, we consider prosecution under the relevant articles for statements that do not contain direct calls for violence to be unlawful. There were no such calls in the anecdote published by Bolshakov.
Sources