Egor Gaidar

Egor Gaidar. In the 91st year, Yeltsin was a ram capable of crushing communist power. Today he has a royal pomp that is dangerous for a politician. If Yeltsin is able to overcome this, he will receive certain chances of elections. In the meantime, the president paves the way for the Communists. For five years, not only Yeltsin has changed, but also his environment. In the 92nd, there were people in his team who were able to argue with him and say “no” to him. Now there are only those who always assent.

Nikolai Ryzhkov I would not underestimate Yeltsin.

I watched it during the past presidential elections. He was a fighter and stayed with him. Of course, Yeltsin is not the one that was in the 91st. He became a different person - his life had a great battles. But Yeltsin, firstly, has preserved the previous attitude towards victory, and secondly, there are levers that the opposition has, power, money and control over the media.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, in fact, the president said: “Down with the ministers-capitalists and deputies-communist!” The message is just a new course. The president remains in centrist positions, democracy is preserved, crooks will be expelled. The meaning of the speech: restoring order, the desire to end the war, the protection of compatriots, the return to our initial spaces of Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan.

Yeltsin will do what he says, helps himself or the new president. After the elections, it will be easier to rake the Avgia stables.

Grigory Yavlinsky previous messages to the Federal Assembly were not fulfilled, the same will be with the current one.

In the speech of Yeltsin, I did not notice either an understanding of the situation in the country, or the understanding of the reasons that led to the current situation. There is nothing in the message that could promise an early end to the war. As for the economic section, there are no new ideas at all. The president does not have a program of action at all.

Gennady Zyuganov does not have a conceptual vision of what is happening and a critical assessment of the done. Populism and lack of logic can be characterized by a message-96. In the field of economics, in the field of social protection, in the field of crime, everything is rewritten from our statements of two years ago.

It turns out that in what is happening everyone is to blame except the president himself.

Alexander Shokhin in the President’s Epistle to the parliament of the 96th year, the demonstration of the invariability of principles is adjacent to self-criticism. Moreover, the president entered the territory of the left opposition, focusing on the social reorientation of the reforms, harshly declaring the liability of managers for non -payment of pensions, benefits, salaries. In the framework of financial stabilization, the task is difficult, but fulfilling this.

Yeltsin intercepts slogans. But he, unlike the opposition, needs positive shifts before the election.