Today the Federal Registration Service must comment on its refusal to register the Great Russia party. Experts have no doubt that state registrars will present formal complaints to the party: inconsistencies in the charter with the requirements of the law and an insufficient number of members (they say that Fed employees were not too lazy to call those who declared their belonging to “Great Russia” in order to verify this fact).

I am afraid that our respected Ombudsman is wrong: questions such as “what is more important - God or natural laws” are not resolved not only by the court, but in general. They are also not resolved in dialogue. Because it is a matter of faith. The proposal to organize a dialogue in itself is undoubtedly constructive.

The Orthodox community expressed its censure to a member of the Public Chamber Glazychev, who opposed the growing intervention of the Church in secular affairs, and demanded that the Nobel laureate of the Academician of Ginzburg, said that "teaching religion in schools, these, to put it mildly, church bastards want to lure the souls of children." “With understanding, I attribute to this impulse of people to protect the church from insults, including in court,” the priest Vladimir Vigilyansky,

The Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation, Vladimir Lukin, calls on academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences and representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church not to exchange accusations, but to discuss controversial issues that this week caused heated controversy between them. “Questions of this kind: what is more important - God or natural laws - are not resolved by any court.

It turns out that in demanding the extradition of Lugovoy, the British “are giving offensive advice for our country - to change the Constitution.” “They need to change their brains, not the Constitution. What they are proposing is obviously a rudiment of colonial thinking,” Putin said at a meeting yesterday with leaders of youth organizations in Zavidovo.

This is the name of the film by German director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, which I watched the other day, and which you may have already heard about. If you haven’t watched it yourself, then a retelling of the plot will make you sad: the GDR, the Stasi, a seasoned agent who follows a couple of artists who are disillusioned with socialism. Along the way, he becomes disillusioned with him and, in the end, saves the heroes at the cost of his own career, although the main character dies.

We continue to analyze the soviet mentality, represented by A.P. Parshev. All countries have money as money, and in Soviet Russia, certainly wooden. And that's right, our hero believes. He correctly guesses that the matter is non -competitiveness. Only confuses concepts. We should talk about the incompetence of the socialist economy, and then the cause of the wooden currency in climatically prosperous social stumps such as the DPRK, Cuba and other freedom -loving Africa is understood.