It was impossible to hope for an acquittal in such a case. The sentence could not be “too lenient” either. The case carries too much political weight for the judge to allow the accused to walk out of the courtroom. It’s good that the authorities decided not to imprison “the maximum.” Putin said that the punishment should not be too severe - and the prosecutor demanded three years, knowing that the court usually gives less than what was requested.

In the Kremlin Unknown about the unknown August 17, 2012 Vladimir Nadein It became known that Dmitry Medvedev was not at height during the war with Georgia. He was a robel, avoided responsibility and would surely ditch the whole thing if it weren’t for Vladimir Putin. He was the true Supreme Commander-in-Chief and Creator of Victory. A dozen retired and current generals insisted on this. In this, slightly blushing with embarrassment, Putin himself admitted. It became known that Mr.

In the opposition The results of the week. Do you want war? You will not get it! August 17, 2012 Alexander Ryklin On the last week, the power strategy regarding one of the leaders of the “Just Russia” by the State Duma deputy Gennady Gudkov became obvious. Mr. Gudkov is waiting for an ambulance and cruel reprisal, apparently, associated with deprivation of liberty.

In the Kremlin Former b. As a competitor to the current August 17, 2012 Dmitry Oreshkin A certain aristocrat with gabash manners accused the low -like girl Madonna of reading morality to us. And, out of office habit, he lied again. Even if you adhere to its specific terminology, the truth is that the former b. She spoke not about morality, but about freedom. That is not unnatural for this kind of young lady. On the contrary, very organic. So a bullet from the Chekist G. again hobbled by.

On August 17, in the Khamovnichesky Court, Judge Marina Syrova began announcing the verdict in the Pussy Riot case. The very first lines of it say that the guilt of Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Maria Alekhina and Ekaterina Samutsevich of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred (which they were charged with) has been established. In describing the actions of the accused, the court partially quotes the indictment (“they continued to grossly violate public order”).