At one time, the Presidium of the Moscow City Court, to a very modest extent, satisfied the demands of the defense within the framework of supervisory proceedings on the initiative of the Supreme Court. In our opinion, he did the minimum he could. He considered issues related to the reduction of punishment on the basis of the humanization of criminal legislation, and, in fact, left substantive issues of defense aside.

In the opposition Why is it necessary March 20, 2013 Georgy Satarov You can congratulate me. For the next five years, I have now become a member of the precinct election commission with a full -fledged voice. I will be on the same area on which I was an observer in the presidential election, and where Putin did not reach us to forty percent. That commission was completely disbanded. Today I met a new composition.

According to the Kommersant newspaper, the Supreme Court requested the criminal cases of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev from the Meshchansky and Khamovnichesky district courts of Moscow. This happened just when their lawyers turned to the Investigative Committee with a statement to bring the judges of the Moscow City Court to criminal liability for forgery.

The President of the Chechen Republic Ramzan Akhmatovich Kadyrov, according to the loud communications of the Grozny stadium, called Mikhail Vilkov, the judge of the Mikhail Vilkov, and the control and disciplinary committee of the Russian Football Union, announced that in the near future he would meet in order to “consider the situation” ... The situation is really difficult.

The other day it became known about the wild case that occurred back in early March in Surgut. A brigade of riot police burst into the local teahouse "halal" in masks and with weapons. The riot police, as usual, put those present on the floor, after which they began to mock those who had a beard. Someone began to cut it with a knife, someone was forced to cut off by himself, threatening to burn with a lighter.

In the opposition Photos are accused March 20, 2013 Alexander Podrabinek A photograph accompanying an article about the dispersal of a peaceful demonstration is an illustration for an event. 120 photographs collected on a photo exhibition dedicated to the events on May 6, 2012 in Bolotnaya Square in Moscow, this is an accusation. It does not appeal to justice, is not based on the articles of the law, does not require anything, does not threaten anyone.

Magistrate Judge Karina Morozova of the Khamovnichesky Court sentenced Yuri Piotrovsky, found guilty of vandalism in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, to a year of restricted freedom. Piotrovsky, as the court found, poured ink on two icons in the temple. The prosecutor's office asked to sentence him to two years of restricted freedom; the court chose a more lenient punishment. Piotrovsky was given credit for seven months spent in a pre-trial detention center.

The executive director of our football premier league, Sergei Cheban, commented on the well-known incident at the match between Terek and Rubin with Kadyrov and the referee, who is “a corrupt... goat.” Mr. Cheban is in doubt whether or not it is worth punishing Kadyrov by banning him from attending one Terek match: “Is it possible to disqualify Kadyrov for one match? I wouldn't want to. Still, the republic needs to live ,” said Cheban. Oh, how!