The Oktyabrsky District Court of St. Petersburg arrested for 30 days Denis Mikhailov, the coordinator of the local headquarters of the strike, Alexei Navalny. about it He tweeted . The activist was found guilty under Part 8 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (repeated violation of the procedure for holding a public action) and under Art. 5.12 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (production, distribution or placement of campaign materials in violation of the law).

The Simonovsky District Court of Moscow arrested the hosts of the Navalny LIVE YouTube channel Ruslan Shaveddinov, press secretary of the politician’s presidential election campaign, and Kira Yarmysh, press secretary of the FBK, for eight and five days. about this on Twitter Yarmysh wrote . The arrest of Shaveddinov is calculated from January 30. The court reclassified the activist's case from part 8 of Art.

The Moscow City Court approved the return to the prosecutor's office of the criminal case of Vladimir Ionov, who was accused of repeated violation of the procedure for holding public events (Article 212.1 of the Criminal Code). TASS reported this with reference to the lawyer of the International Human Rights Group "Agora" Olga Dinze, who represents the interests of Ionov.

The European Court of Human Rights communicated the second complaint of Daria Polyudova, convicted of calls for extremism (Article 280 of the Criminal Code) and separatism (Article 280.1 of the Criminal Code). This was reported by RBC with reference to lawyer Alexander Popkov. The court combined Polyudova's two complaints - about the arrest and about the unfair sentence.

The Supreme Court of Crimea upheld the fines for participants in single pickets against the persecution of Crimean Tatars - Abdulmalik Susanov, Rustem Kurkchi, Rustem Ametov and Asan Zekeryaev. about this on Facebook . writes Crimean Solidarity The men were accused of violating the procedure for holding a public event (part 5 of article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses).

In St. Petersburg, law enforcement officers were looking for the coordinator of the movement "Spring" Yuri Vasiliev. He reported this to the OVD-Info hotline. The police came to the apartment to the participants of the movement, from the windows of which Vasilyev and other activists waved flags during the “Voters' Strike” on January 28. On that day, employees of the Center "E" were already trying to get in there.

The Moscow Regional Court recognized as legal the refusal to satisfy Ildar Dadin’s claim against the Federal Penitentiary Service and the administration of IK-7 of Karelia. Interfax reports this with reference to Dadin’s representative Nikolai Zbroshenko. On September 19, 2017, the Zheleznodorozhny City Court rejected Dadin’s claim.

In Lipetsk, Vladislav Zlobin, an employee of Alexei Navalny’s strike headquarters, was arrested for 20 days. About this in the headquarters group on the VKontakte social network. It is reported that the Sovetsky District Court found him guilty under Part 8 of Art. 20.2 of the Administrative Code (repeated violation of the established procedure for organizing or holding a public event). According to the group members, Zlobin should not have been arrested because he suffers from diabetes.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) communicated the complaint of the coordinator of Alexei Navalny's headquarters in Krasnodar, Dmitry (Miroslav) Valkovich. He was detained at a protest on March 26, 2017 and later arrested for 10 days. This was reported to OVD-Info by the lawyer of the International Human Rights Group "Agora" Alexander Popkov. The ECtHR has asked Russia a number of questions and expects answers by May 4, 2018.

The Moscow District Court of Kaliningrad arrested Vladimir Nemanov, a volunteer at the local strike headquarters, Alexei Navalny, for 10 days. This was reported in the group "Team Navalny | Kaliningrad" in "VKontakte". He was found guilty under Part 8 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (repeated violation of the procedure for holding a public event).

In Moscow, journalist Pavel Nikulin was released after interrogation by the FSB. He wrote about this in his Telegram channel. On the morning of January 31, they came to search him as part of a case under Art. 205.3 of the Criminal Code (training for the purpose of carrying out terrorist activities). The document was issued by the Kaluga court. Nikulin himself connects the search with the text “From Kaluga with Jihad,” which was published in The New Times magazine.

Judicial precinct No. 5 of the Moskovsky district of Cheboksary fined Anton Kravchenko, a member of the regional council of Open Russia, for 5,000 rubles. about this on Twitter . wrote Dmitry Semenov, a member of the Council of the organization, Kravchenko was found guilty of participating in the activities of an organization recognized as undesirable on the territory of Russia (Article 20.33 of the Code of Administrative Offenses).

Journalist Pavel Nikulin, who was searched in the morning on a terrorism case, was taken away for questioning by the FSB. Mediazona writes about this. As the journalist’s friend Yana clarified in a conversation with the publication, the laptops were confiscated from both of them because they were stored in the same room. FSB officers also inspected the neighbors' rooms, scattering personal belongings, but did not confiscate anything.

On January 31, the Supreme Court of Crimea approved the decision to arrest Crimean Tatar activist Enver Krosh. He was accused of promoting prohibited symbols and arrested for ten days. about it Writes "Crimea. Realities". At the same time, there was no information on the consideration of the case on the official website of the Supreme Court of Crimea. Krosh petitioned for a break for the arrival of a lawyer, but the petition was rejected.

In Kirov, police called activist Vadim Ananyin and demanded an explanation in connection with the failed protest rally. this The activist announced on his page on VKontakte. Explanations were asked to be given based on the materials of the case on bringing Ananyin to responsibility under Part 1 of Art. 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violation by the organizer of the procedure for holding a public event).