In Moscow, the Investigative Committee conducted a search in the apartment of Andrei Klimashev - he was later interrogated as a witness in the case of the use of violence against a police officer (Article 318 of the Criminal Code) during the January 2021 protests. Klimashev’s interests were represented by lawyer Maxim Ovchinnikov, who collaborates with OVD-Info. After interrogation, the man was not released yet.

The Second Western District Military Court in Moscow sentenced 48-year-old Pskov resident Alexei Shibanov to a 300 thousand ruble fine because of his publications on VKontakte about an explosion in the Arkhangelsk FSB. Sever.Realii talks about this with reference to his lawyer. They report that Shibanov was found guilty under the article on justification of terrorism (205.2 of the Criminal Code).

In Dagestan, Eduard Atayev, the former coordinator of Navalny’s local headquarters, was placed in custody for two months - he is a suspect in the case of possession of explosives (Article 222.1 of the Criminal Code), “Caucasian Knot”. writes The decision was made by the Khasavyurt District Court on March 27. "Kavkaz.Realii" with Ataev's lawyer, who wished not to disclose his name. The activist told the defense lawyer that a grenade was planted on him.

Activist Sofya Semenova, who is suspected of burning an effigy in military uniform in St. Petersburg, left Russia on March 27. She spoke about this on her Instagram that same day. told As Semenova wrote, a few days before, she learned that her preventive measure would be appealed by the prosecutor’s office, insisting on the need to place the activist in custody. “At that moment I completely lost hope that I would remain free.

Electronics company LG, at the request of Roskomnadzor, removed the “Present Time” application from Smart TV in Russia and Belarus. This was reported by Krym.Realii with reference to the company’s press service. The agency added the publication’s website to the register of prohibited sites and blocked it on February 27.

The Vyborg District Court of St. Petersburg did not order the arrest of Georgy Vasiliev, who is accused of rehabilitating Nazism (Part 3 of Article 354.1 of the Criminal Code). This was reported by the joint press service of the city courts. Vasilyev was detained on March 28, and the next day he was charged.

In Omsk, FSB officers detained independent deputy of the local city council Dmitry Petrenko. At the moment he is not in touch, on Twitter “Omsk Civil Association”. reports Activists do not know what the detention is connected with. Before the incident, the deputy was in the Oktyabrsky Court, where his case was being considered under the article on displaying symbols of extremist organizations (Article 20.3 of the Administrative Code).

The Sovetsky District Court of Ryazan rejected the coordinator of the Ryazan branch of the “Voice” movement, Sofia Ivanova, in a lawsuit challenging the status of a “foreign agent” media outlet. She herself told OVD-Info about this. On September 29, the Ministry of Justice added Ivanova and 21 other people, as well as 4 independent organizations to the register of media “foreign agents”. Courts in different regions of Russia refuse to remove this status from Golos members.

The Staropromyslovsky District Court of Grozny extended the arrest of Zarema Musaeva, the mother of Chechen activists Ibragim and Abubakar Yangulbaev, until April 27. The Committee Against Torture is about this. reports Musaeva did not take part in the meeting, as she is undergoing a medical examination in the hospital at the request of a lawyer - the woman suffers from diabetes. On February 2, the court in Grozny gave Zarem Musaev two months.

The police detained a resident of St. Petersburg, Konstantin Nadein, when he ran in the T -shirt “Putin thief, freedom to Navalny”. The detainee himself informed the OVD-info. A man is charged with an article on discrediting the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (Articles 20.3.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses). It is not known whether there were some other inscriptions on the detainee T-shirt-for example, anti-war.

In Pushchino, near Moscow, a case was opened against a local resident for vandalism (Article 214 of the Criminal Code) because he poured red paint on a monument to veterans of local wars in Victory Park. The man himself told OVD-Info about this, asking not to use his name. On March 26, he poured paint on the monument, and the next day he was detained by police officers. There, the man’s phone was confiscated and an explanation was taken. The court then ordered him to prohibit certain actions.

A defendant in the “palace case,” TikTok blogger Konstantin Lakeev, was transferred to pre-trial detention center No. 3 in Chelyabinsk. This is what the project “Prisoners 212” is about. writes In December 2021, the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow sentenced blogger Lakeev, known as Kostya Kievsky, to two years and eight months of imprisonment in a general regime colony. He was found guilty of damaging property for hooligan reasons (Part 2 of Article 167 of the Criminal Code).

In Bashkortostan, the scientist Ildar Gabdrafikov, who worked at the Institute of Ethnological Research of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, was fired for political reasons. This is reported by the publication "Idel.Realii". Formally, they simply refused to renew the working contract with the scientist.

The Moscow City Court did not change the preventive measure for the defendant in the case about the telegram channel “What-to-Delat!”, Tomsk journalist Igor Kuznetsov. The “Human Rights Protection” telegram channel talks about this with reference to lawyer Sergei Badamshin. In February, the Basmanny District Court of Moscow reported that Kuznetsov was given a term of imprisonment in a pre-trial detention center until May 14, 2022.

The Supreme Court of Russia refused to consider the cassation appeal against the verdict of Alexei Navalny in the Yves Rocher case and the complaint about the arrest of the politician after arriving in Moscow from Germany. Interfax is about this. reports “The court refused to transfer the case for consideration at the court hearing of the cassation court,” the court’s press service told Interfax.