“After” is one of the most important for the editorial office of Polit.ru projects. For almost two years now we have been talking with a variety of people - scientists, writers, political scientists, journalists, businessmen - about what it is after. Does Russia have a future? Where to look for your “not very terrible Russia of the future”? Well, yes, like this - “not very terrible”, we are modest realists, and not rampant optimists.

Ivan Vasilievich Karhapi originally from the village of Sonkayranta halfway between the city of Yoensuu and the village of Ilomantsi. The local Orthodox were then included in the parish of Ilomantsi. Ivan married, he had two sons. The eldest, Sergey, died shortly after birth, and Alexei survived. Ovidev, Ivan entered into a second marriage. His family, along with his father, Vasily, lived on the Nissille farm.

Historian, professor at the University of Copenhagen Mikhail Suslov in an interview with Kholod says : “All existing names are not suitable to describe the ideology that we see now in Russia. I think this is something new. <…> I describe the core of Putinism in three concepts, which may be a little difficult to perceive by ear, but I will try to reveal their meaning. The first is identitarian conservatism.

The Foreign Publishing House is represented by a collection of works by the English writer Matthew Gregory Lewis (1775–1818) “Monk. Anaconda. The Venetian killer ”(translation of Alexandra Glebov, Maria Kurenna and Irina Gurova).

Journalist Michelle Goldberg writes in The New York Times about the US authorities' stubborn refusal to admit that the current Israeli government is made up of extremists and radicals: “After the murderous Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, Jerusalem had every right to take revenge, just like any other country in its place. However, there is a difference between the war that liberal supporters of Israel would like to see and the war that Jerusalem is actually fighting.