How would a private partyist react to the report of Mezhuev-Remizov? The first and most obvious reaction would be in rejection. One of the points why the party apparatus and activist EP would not like the report I already described below . This item is the oblivion of Putin . Putin for the party (he is still not a party, like God is not a church) is an extremely significant figure. In more detail about this meaning here . Second: unacceptable amazing .

The book of Dmitry Kalihman “Nikitomikhalkovshchina” was published, in which the author tries to understand the work of the director. In a stagnation brochure, the correspondence of the content of some films of the master’s historical realities of the described time is scrupulously analyzed.

The film adaptation of Pelevin, namely the "Geureyshn Pi", right now - it is very symbolic. The last year and a half I am observing some nostalgia in the nineties. Although no, “nostalgia” is not too suitable. Rather, these are attempts by the "nineties" to return to our life today. These attempts are especially acute in my professional activities of sector. Kashpirovsky, who appeared on NTV, I tell you - this is so, the top of the iceberg.

Down with the Washington consensus! From the side Alexander Morozov http://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2011/04/18_a_3587173.shtml Remizov-Mezhuyev with a software article that EP should suddenly take an electoral place ... of the Communist Party, i.e. Go to the opposition to the liberal government, which is already carrying out unpopular reforms now and is going further. And what good word they came up with a "electoral golem " ... Almost like a "batch of crooks and thieves" ...

Down with the Washington consensus! From the side Alexander Morozov http://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2011/04/18_a_3587173.shtml Remizov-Mezhuyev with a software article that EP should suddenly take an electoral place ... of the Communist Party, i.e. Go to the opposition to the liberal government, which is already carrying out unpopular reforms now and is going further. And what good word they came up with a "electoral golem " ... Almost like a "batch of crooks and thieves" ...

Tandem: Cracking the "black box" College of tandem Gleb Pavlovsky The discipline of the tandem locked the players in the common space, immobilizing them and depriving the initiative. The main property of the place: they do not make decisions, they are waiting. All decisions will be made "after that day." Before that, the decisions are not made, and attempts are suppressed.

Generation zero watches “Generation Pi” The dispute about the 1990s Sergey Mitrofanov A product called Victor Ginzburg’s film based on Victor Pelevin’s novel “Generation Pi” has all components to be recorded in successful art projects. Rather, three of them are three advantages and three obvious components of hypothetical success. First: Literary First Proceedings - Pelevin.

An analysis of the situation of the last month suggests that the American plan to reformat the Great Middle East reached the boundaries of its capabilities. There is no reason to say that it was fully fulfilled and exactly as its compilers expected. The blitzkrieg of democracy in Libya and Syria gave failure, and the situation with Yemen is full of incomprehensibility, although the transition of the country to the external administration of Saudi Arabia is becoming more and more obvious.

A product called Victor Ginzburg’s film based on Victor Pelevin’s novel “Generation Pi” has all components to be recorded in successful art projects. Rather, three of them are three advantages and three obvious components of hypothetical success. First: Literary First Proceedings - Pelevin. I don’t read Pelevin myself, he is bored with me, but because I hear from all sides: “Pelevin, Pelevin ...” - I conclude that Pelevin is a very good primary basis.

The discipline of the tandem locked the players in the common space, immobilizing them and depriving the initiative. The main property of the place: they do not make decisions, they are waiting. All decisions will be made "after that day." Before that, the decisions are not made, and attempts are suppressed. Everything is postponed to the mythological "later." A decision that cannot be made is made so that it does not oblige anyone to anything.

How would an ordinary party member react to Mezhuev-Remizov’s report? The first and most obvious reaction would be rejection. described one of the points why the party apparatchik and United Russia activist would not like the report I have already . This point is oblivion of Putin . Putin for the party (after all, he is not a party, just as God is not a church) is an extremely significant figure. More details about this meaning here . Second: unacceptable defeatism .