On October 25, 2005, at the Magistrate's Court in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, testimony was heard from witnesses defending left-wing radicals who hung a scarecrow on May 9, 2005 on the monument-tank T-34. Veterans of the Great Patriotic War, headed by the chairman of the City Council Vladimir Denisenko, said that they were not offended and asked the court to acquit the defendants.

October 27, 2005 "Voice of Beslan" held a picket in Moscow in protest against the actions of the prosecutor's office. Based on the fact that the permit had been issued for holding a rally near the building of the investigative department of the Prosecutor General's Office on Baumanskaya, and not near the building on Bolshaya Dmitrovka, the picketers were escorted to the Tverskoy police station.

On October 27, 2005, in Moscow, in front of the residence of the presidential plenipotentiary in the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation, the Vanguard of the Red Youth (AKM) held a protest against attempts to bury Lenin's body, dispersed by riot police with the use of force. First, the participants of the action marched along Ilyinka, and then tried to hand over to the embassy an appeal with their demands and a wreath with a photograph of plenipotentiary Georgy Poltavchenko.

The head of the Saratov diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church called for limiting the spread of gambling in Russia, which he called a "social disease" and put on a par with alcoholism and drug addiction. In the appeal of Bishop Longin, which was sent to the Saratov Regional Duma and to the vice-speaker of the State Duma V.V.

On September 27, 2005, in Vladimir, in front of the administration building of the Vladimir Region, an unauthorized rally (according to some sources, a religious procession) of Orthodox Christians took place. The participants of the rally marched around the building and stood on the square in front of the administration.

On October 27, 2005 in Grozny in the Internet club "Hacker" the Republican tournament of Chechen hackers on "cleansing" took place . Internet from fascist and anti-Chechen sites. The tournament was organized by the Chechen republican organization of the Union of Right Forces as part of the All-Russian SPS campaign to eradicate information terror unleashed by some media against the Chechen people.

As reported on October 25, 2005 by the Vremya Novostei newspaper, the Russian government intends to return the rule on confiscation of property to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: the bill has already been prepared by the cabinet of ministers and will soon be submitted by the president to the State Duma. Statements about the need to return the confiscation of property caused a flurry of criticism from human rights activists and the legal community.

On October 27, 2005, the first court session was held in Vladimir on the suit of M. Akhmatov against the deputy of the Legislative Assembly I. Artemov. The case belongs to the cases of private prosecution and could be considered by a justice of the peace. But since one of the parties is a deputy of the Legislative Assembly, then a special procedure for proceedings has been established for this category of persons.

On the night of October 27-28, 2005, Ivan Starikov, a member of the Federal Political Council of the Union of Right Forces (SPS), was beaten in Moscow. Near his house on Udaltsova Street, two unknown men in knitted black hats attacked the politician and, after beating him, disappeared. As I. Starikov himself said, the attackers were not interested in his wallet, mobile phone, or car keys.

Issue 80, 2005, of Novaya Gazeta published an article by Ilya Yashin entitled "Institute of Snitching Revived in Universities", dedicated to the "anti-orange" youth movement "Young Russia". The author of the article, in particular, claims that a few months ago the leadership of the Moscow State Technical University. Bauman conducted conversations with student activists.

On October 27, 2005, information appeared that in Nalchik, relatives of those killed and injured during the attack of militants, as well as simply witnesses of the incident, rushed at women in hijabs, shouting: "It's all because of you! " . According to the Islam.ru website, "only Muslims who observe the norms of their religion are subjected to harassment by both the police and local residents. These are women who dress in accordance with Sharia, and men who attend a mosque.

October 27, 2005 "Rossiyskaya Gazeta" published a transcript of a round table on the problem of radical nationalism in the Voronezh region, in which Ivan Zamaraev, deputy regional prosecutor, took part. In particular, he tried to refute the reproaches of the head of the public reception of the Commissioner for Human Rights, Andrei Rashevsky, that the regional prosecutor's office was not taking the necessary measures to combat extremism. For example, I.

On October 24, 2005, an anti-government NBP picket was held in Kirov, the participants of which were detained by the UBOP. The National Bolsheviks tried to prove to the police officers that they had the right to hold a picket, but to no avail. In the department, after drawing up the protocol under Art. On 20.2, part 1, the detainees were released. Sources Kirov: the government to the bunk! // NBP-Info. 2005. October 27.

On October 28, 2005, the Fergana.Ru portal published an article devoted to the situation of Kyrgyz migrants in Russia (mainly using Samara as an example). The problems that people who come from Kyrgyzstan face are not unique: poverty, lawlessness, violence. And while law enforcement agencies are fighting the slave trade, migrants, most of whom are illegal immigrants, cannot find protection from racial violence.

On October 27, 2005, the Public Opinion Foundation published the results of the study “Attack on Foreign Students in Voronezh.” A survey of 1,500 people was conducted in 100 settlements in 44 federal subjects on October 22-23, 2005. An additional survey of the Moscow population included 600 respondents. The statistical error does not exceed 3.6%. Only 84% of respondents were to some extent aware of the attack in Voronezh . Of these, the vast majority strongly condemned the incident.