A criminal case has been opened against Alexei Navalny for insulting judge Vera Akimova during a hearing in the case of slandering a veteran. This was reported by the politician's Instagram account.
“The same aunt [Judge Akimova], who was running a fabricated case of ‘insulting a veteran’ that struck all the country’s lawyers,” recalls Navalny. “How exactly he offended is also not indicated.”
In February, Navalny was fined 850,000 rubles in a libel case against veteran Ignat Artemenko. According to Judge Vera Akimova, the politician "certainly knew that the information he disseminated was false" and his guilt is confirmed by the testimony of witnesses and experts.
Thus, three criminal cases have already been initiated against Navalny, the oppositionist noted. At the end of last year, he was accused of embezzling donations to the FBK, and in April it became known that Navalny and his associates had been suspects since February in a criminal case (under Part 1 of Article 239 of the Criminal Code) on the creation of an NPO that infringes on the personality and rights of citizens.
“The decision is on 3 sheets of paper, there is no evidence at all,” Navalny comments on the donation fraud case. “It just says “kidnapped.” That's all". In the case “under the very exotic Article 239,” Navalny points out that among the evidence in the ruling is the publication of the film “Putin’s Palace” without permission.
“In general, I am a genius and a puppeteer of the underworld. Professor Navariarti,” summed up the oppositionist.
On February 20, the Moscow City Court upheld the decision to replace Navalny's probation with a real one in the Yves Rocher case. Excluding the period of house arrest, the politician will stay in the colony for about two and a half years. There was almost no doubt about what decision the Moscow City Court would take: Navalny fell into a well-laid trap. From a legal point of view, there are almost no questions to her. The Bell explained why.