The book of Paul Gottfried "The Strange Death of Marxism." Useful book. Dmitry Uzlaner sent her layout. Apparently, she is about to be released in Irisen, in the same series where Creleg and so on. This is such an American conservative agitprop. The professor writes a large historical and political pamphlet (in the traditions of Anglo-Saxon pamphlets) for the needs of the current politicians of his camp.

The fact that in this case the audience can read Junger in the manner of Hitler - does not care at all .

I have long been extremely frustrated by one fact. Why in Russia left intellectuals, which, by the way, are not so few, cannot unite in a single powerful force - in what could be called a "political monolith"? The energy and passion of many Russian leftists are so great that, I am convinced, united, they would be reduced by the mountains, constituting a force that we did not have equal, and no. However, this does not happen ...

From the editorial office. The text about "young conservatism" - the ideological and political course, which has formed in Russia since the beginning of the 2000s, RSH begins to discuss the problem of ideology - its relevance, its creatures and, most importantly, its significance for the "generation of the nineties." The last topic is miraculously disclosed in the following text.

The French writer Jean-Cristopher Rufin in the anti-utopia “Globalia” claims that the destruction of books will not begin with prohibitions and persecution (like Raya Bradbury in another classical anti-utopia “451 degrees Fahrenheit”), but, on the contrary, with their extreme distribution. They publish a lot about everything. But most of the published is generally unworthy of the printing press. Shop shelves are littered with unnecessary books, as well as other unnecessary goods.

From the editorial office. Just the other day, the light of the book of Paul Gottfried’s book “The Strange Death of Marxism” saw the light of the book. Due to the fact that the English text was released several years ago-2005-we asked Paul Gottfried to answer us if something in Marxism has changed over the years that passed since the publication-did Marxism come to life, whether he completely disappeared.

From the editorial office. An interview with the rector of the Russian Economic School RG continues to discuss the topic "The Epition of the State". * * * RG: Dear Sergey Maratovich, did the strengthening of power occur as a result of the economic crisis? Was the state strengthening? Is it possible to say that the crisis failed the line under the processes of globalization? Sergey Guriev: What will the state become after the crisis?

It would hardly have occurred to anyone in their right mind and solid memory to challenge the aesthetic virtues of the article by the respected Dmitry Kralechkin on Liberty.ru , which caused a fairly large number of responses in the Russian segment of LJ among the so-called domestic public intellectuals. Of course, the topic raised by Kralechkin is relevant.

A stupid dispute about the expediency of the publication of a certain kind of literature does not give a good rest. I decided to approach the case "specifically", from the standpoint of applied sociology - the sociology of my book shelf. He looked at his shelf book and realized: there is material for an investigative experiment.

From the editorial office. Today, the book of the American historian (by profession) and the Pale -Conservator (by vocation) of Paul Edward Gottfried “Strange Death of Marxism”, translated and released by Irisen Publishing House, is published from the press. On May 15, the Club of the Russian Institute will host a presentation of this sensational book in the United States.

From the editorial office. Two reviews of Valery Anashvili, the editor -in -chief of Logos and Pushkin magazines, published in the last issue of Pushkin, caused an extremely serious polemic among the Russian intellectual public. Almost all discussing the problem somehow look too much at the German -speaking authors - Karl Schmitt, Ernst Yunger, Hans Freyer. For this reason, their replicas look extremely incomplete and therefore have a dubious value.

From the editorial office. The replica of Valery Anashvili in the journal Pushkin about the books of representatives of the conservative revolution caused a lively discussion. However, almost all discussing the problem so much biasedly look at the German -speaking authors - Karl Schmitt, Ernst Jungar, Hans Freyer. But these remarks look extremely incomplete and therefore have dubious value, and for what reason: the word was not given to those people who publish this literature.