Sanctions against Internet providers

Recently, demands for telecom operators to block sites containing “extremist materials” have become more frequent. Nevertheless, prosecutors' offices everywhere and regularly oblige telecom operators to restrict access to sites because of one or more materials found there that are recognized as extremist (and often not recognized as such by the court, but only suspected by the prosecutor's office of "sedition"). Sometimes these requirements also apply to the websites of religious organizations and groups. Our position on the issue of website blocking is outlined in detail here .

Now the prosecutor's office, as a rule, demands blocking without going to court, and these actions are motivated by the Ruling issued on May 10, 2011 by the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. We believe that often such actions are still unlawful. Read more about this here .

This document combines those news about blocking of sites, in relation to which we have reason to believe that law enforcement agencies exceeded their powers, for example, they demanded to block access to a site that does not contain materials included in the Federal List, or on which such materials represent is an atypical exception (for example, in a network library).

Those cases where we do not have such grounds are displayed in a similar document in the section “Racism and xenophobia”. And some news is displayed in both documents, since, for example, decisions on different sites may be legitimate to varying degrees.

Due to the increase in this type of news, starting July 1, 2012, we combine them into one list.

On November 24, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Mari El reported that the Yoshkar-Ola City Court made a decision obliging providers OJSC Rostelecom, Mobile TeleSystems, MegaFon, Vympel-Communications, and CJSC ER-Telecom Holding to restrict access to the online library website http://booksgid.com, which contained extremist materials. Let us remind you that we believe that blocking online libraries because of one material is inappropriate and unlawful; in such cases, individual pages should be blocked.
On November 19, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Inzensky district of the Ulyanovsk region announced a proposal made to the director of the Ulyanovsk branch of OJSC Rostelecom. The submission, in particular, contains a demand to limit access to the network library "Texts of Songs" (textpesni.org) - on the grounds that the text of the song "Skinhead Muscovites" by the group "Shmeli", included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials, was discovered on this resource . Let us recall that, from our point of view, the requirement to block online libraries as a whole is unlawful (only individual pages should be blocked).
On November 5, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Ulyanovsk region reported that the prosecutor of the Sengileevsky district made a representation to the director of the Ulyanovsk branch of OJSC Rostelecom with a demand to immediately take measures to limit access to Internet resources that promote the inferiority of citizens based on their nationality and religion , and bring to strict liability all guilty officials. The reason was, among other things, that subscribers of the Ulyanovsk branch of OJSC Rostelecom had access to the official website of Jehovah's Witnesses jw.org, on which one can find the text of the prohibited brochure “What Does the Bible Really Teach?” Let us remind you that we consider the ban on literature of Jehovah's Witnesses to be unlawful.
On September 8, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Udmurtia reported that the magistrate court of the Votkinsk district judicial district sentenced the director of the Ural Dawns sanatorium-preventorium to a fine of 20,000 rubles under Part 2 of Art. 6.17 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (non-use by a person organizing access to means of protecting children from information harmful to their health and (or) development distributed through information and telecommunication networks). Other employees found guilty were subject to disciplinary action. The reason was that Wi-Fi worked on the territory of the sanatorium, but a content filtering system was not installed and age confirmation was not provided. Let us remind you that we are against holding the administration of cafes, Internet cafes, hotels and other similar establishments accountable for the lack of content filtering, since they are designed not only for children (who are supervised by their parents), but also for adult users, whose right to information should not be limited.
On September 4, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Lipetsk region reported that the heads of ten campaigns-regional telecom operators - Media Network LLC, Telecom TZ LLC, BIG Telecom Lipetsk LLC, Aikotel LLC, New Communication Technologies LLC, LLC "Raduga-Telecom", CJSC "Lipetsk Mobile", LLC "Lipetsk Cable Networks", LLC "IT-Net" and IP Ilinu V.N. - proposals were made to eliminate violations of the legislation on countering extremist activities. The reason was that telecom operators “did not exclude free access for users to information materials of the Internet resource of an international religious Islamic association, on the pages of which there are links for copying religious literature, recognized by the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan as extremist and included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. ” . It is reported that the demands of the prosecutors have been satisfied: 3 officials have been disciplined for violations, and access to prohibited literature has been blocked. Apparently, we are talking about a website that contains the works of the Turkish theologian Said Nursi, the ban of which we consider unlawful.
On August 25, 2014, the Magistrate Court of Judicial District No. 4 of Budennovsk, Stavropol Territory, at the request of the Budennovsk Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of the Stavropol Territory, sentenced under Art. 6.17 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation (violation of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the protection of children from information harmful to their health and (or) development) cafe owners Victoria Selyametova and Yulia Sarah to a fine of 5 thousand rubles each. The reason was that access to prohibited information, including extremist materials, was possible through the establishment’s wireless Wi-Fi network. Let us remind you that existing content filtering systems are ineffective, and the blame for this cannot be placed on the owners of computer clubs, Internet cafes, etc.
On July 22, 2014, the prosecutor's office of Dmitrovgrad, Ulyanovsk region, announced a claim against the Ulyanovsk branch of OJSC Rostelecom for the obligation to restrict access to the " History " section of the "Audiobooks" network library and to the " Torrentino " torrent tracker. The reason for the lawsuit was the discovery of G. Picker’s book “Hitler’s Table Talks” on these resources, which was included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. In addition, the prosecutor's report about the statement of claim refers to the Format 18 video "I am Russian" (item 1781 of the Federal List of Extremist Materials), but provides a link to the torrent of Picker's book. Let us remind you that, from our point of view, blocking an entire resource because of one material is inappropriate and unlawful; in such cases, individual pages should be blocked.
On July 14, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Ulyanovsk region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Zavolzhsky district of Ulyanovsk went to court with a demand to limit access to three sites due to the fact that they posted the banned book "Grebe" by Ernst Chiemer (a children's propaganda book from the time of the Third Reich). In particular, we are talking about the network library free-audiokniga.narod.ru, which contains a variety of materials. From our point of view, the prosecutor’s office should have sought to restrict access specifically to that page of the library that contained the book Chimera, and not to the entire resource as a whole.
On June 27, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Perm region reported that the Leninsky District Court of Perm satisfied the claim of the prosecutor of the city of Krasnokamsk against the Perm branch of Rostelecom OJSC and blocked a number of online libraries containing extremist materials, including books by Said Nursi. We consider the ban on Nursi’s works to be unlawful, and in addition we oppose the blocking of large resources due to individual pages.
On June 3, 2014, it became known that the Vyborg City Prosecutor's Office sent a statement of claim to the court, in which it demands to oblige the Internet provider LLC "SUCCESS" to limit access to extremist materials that were available to students of the Vyborg Technical School of Agro-Industrial and Forestry Complex. It is impossible to understand from the prosecutor's report whether the computer club had a content filtering system, but we assume that otherwise it would have been indicated that it did not exist.
On April 29, 2014, it became known that by decision of the Central District Court of Barnaul dated January 28, 2014, Rostelecom OJSC was ordered (among other materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials) to block access to the Good Truth Machine leaflet, recognized as extremist 12 December 2012 by the judicial panel of the Vologda Regional Court. Rostelecom introduced blocking by IP address, thus blocking the sites navalny.ru, dacha.fbk.ru and delo.navalny.ru.
On April 11, 2014, it became known about the claim of the prosecutor's office of the Kalininsky district of Cheboksary against the provider ZAO ER-TELECOM HOLDING, filed in the Leninsky district court of Cheboksary, which contains a demand to limit access to extremist sites. The reason for the lawsuit was the results of a prosecutor's investigation, which revealed that the Cheboksary computer club, which used the services of this provider, had access to materials included in the Federal List. It is impossible to understand from the prosecutor's report whether the computer club had a content filtering system, but we assume that otherwise it would have been indicated that it did not exist. Let us also recall that existing content filtering systems are ineffective, and the blame for this cannot be placed on the owners of computer clubs, Internet cafes, etc.
On April 2, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Chelyabinsk region reported that, at the request of the prosecutor's office of Novocheboksarsk, the Moscow District Court of Novocheboksarsk sentenced the provider Internet Center LLC (CHEBNET) under Art. 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (distribution of extremist materials) to a fine of 50 thousand rubles, and the Leninsky District Court of Cheboksary, under the same article, fined the director of the city branch of Rostelecom OJSC two thousand rubles for the fact that providers did not block materials recognized as extremist by the decision of Kirovsky District Court of Novosibirsk dated June 21, 2013. In particular, we are talking about the wrongfully banned video of Navalny’s supporters “Let us remember the Crooks and Thieves their Manifesto 2002.” In addition, from our point of view, it is unlawful to hold providers liable under Art. 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Offences, since they are not involved in the deliberate distribution of prohibited materials.
On April 1, 2014, the Rostelecom provider was forced to block the website of the well-known newspaper Kopeysky Rabochiy in the Chelyabinsk region. The bona fide resource was blocked because the Central District Court of Barnaul decided to block access to sites containing extremist materials via IP. “Kopeysky Worker” was also located at the same IP. Administrators of the newspaper's website transferred it to another IP.
On April 1, 2014, it became known about claims against providers OJSC Rostelecom and LLC Net By Net Holding, obliging them to limit access to sites of an extremist nature, prepared by the prosecutor's office of Volgodonsk, Rostov region. The reason for the lawsuits was that, despite the content filters available on computers in the pedagogical and medical colleges of Volgodonsk, inspectors were able to gain access to prohibited materials, in particular, to the poem “Eternal Trouble” by A. Trubin, included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials .
On March 26, 2014, the Sergiev-Posad city prosecutor's office of the Moscow region reported 12 lawsuits to the Sergiev-Posad city court demanding that providers of the Sergiev-Posad municipal district be prohibited from accessing network libraries www.akt-zakon.ru, militera.lib.ru, www .martial-site.ru and to the forum of Jehovah's Witnesses www.jwforum.name. During the check on these sites, the texts of the books “Fascism and Russian Emigration” by A. Okorokov, “Table Talks with Hitler” by G. Picker, “The Personality of a Muslim in the form that Islam seeks to give it with the help of the Koran and Sunnah” were discovered. Hashimi and a certain book from the Jehovah's Witnesses forum (file deleted). Currently, 9 claims have been reviewed and satisfied. Let us note that the prosecutor's office's claims refer to the blocking of entire sites, and not individual pages, which, from our point of view, is unlawful. In addition, we consider the ban on the book “The Personality of a Muslim” to be unlawful.
On March 18, it became known that the Pallasovsky District Court of the Volgograd Region sentenced the owners of the local cafe "El" to a fine of 20 thousand rubles under Part 2 of Art. 6.17 Code of Administrative Offenses (violation of legislation on the protection of children from information harmful to their health and (or) development). The reason was that it was possible to access prohibited information, including extremist materials, from computers intended for cafe visitors. Let us remind you that existing content filtering systems are ineffective, and the blame for this cannot be placed on the owners of computer clubs, Internet cafes, etc.
On March 13, 2014, Alexei Navalny’s blog on Live Journal (navalny.livejournal.com) was added to the unified register of prohibited information. As the prosecutor's office stated, the operation of this Internet page violates the provisions of the court decision on the selection of a preventive measure for a citizen against whom a criminal case has been initiated. Due to the republication of entries on Navalny’s blog, on March 13-14, the website of the radio station “Echo of Moscow” (echo.msk.ru) was also temporarily completely blocked. It is not clear what relation a hypothetical violation of a preventive measure has to the law on extrajudicial blocking of sites, which provides for restriction of access if the published information contains “calls for mass riots, extremist activities, incitement of interethnic and (or) interfaith hatred, participation in terrorist activities.” activities, participation in public mass events held in violation of the established order." Neither the Prosecutor General's Office nor Roskomnadzor made any such claims against Navalny; accordingly, the blog was blocked illegally.
On March 13, 2014, Roskomnadzor, at the request of the Prosecutor General's Office, included the sites Grani.ru, Kasparov.ru and Daily Journal (ej.ru) into the unified register of prohibited information and sent a request to providers to immediately restrict access to them. From the point of view of prosecutors, these sites contain calls for illegal activities and participation in mass events held in violation of the established order. The supervisory authorities did not explain exactly what materials they were talking about, and the sites were completely blocked.
During the period from March 7 to March 12, 2014, various Russian providers blocked the YouTube portal for some time. The reason was that the General Prosecutor's Office, in accordance with the new blocking mechanism, ordered to close access to the video of Valeria Novodvorskaya and Konstantin Borovoy with an appeal to the residents of Ukraine. This ban in itself is controversial from a formal point of view, since the video contains inflammatory calls addressed to people inhabiting the territory of another state. As usual, Roskomnadzor and representatives of provider companies later announced that access to the entire portal was blocked by mistake or for technical reasons. YouTube gradually returned to users, and with it the notorious video. Let us remind you that since for most Russian providers blocking individual pages causes at least temporary problems, users regularly lose access to large services entirely.
On February 18, 2014, it became known that the Leninsky District Court of Rostov-on-Don, following a claim by the prosecutor's office of the Kasharsky district of the Rostov region against OJSC Rostelecom, decided to restrict access to a number of sites containing materials recognized as extremist. The names and exact number of sites are not reported, but it is known that among them there are several online libraries, and among the materials to which access must be prohibited are books by Said Nursi. The court decision has not yet entered into legal force. Let us recall that, from our point of view, the decision to block online libraries was unlawful (only individual pages should have been blocked); It is also unlawful to recognize Nursi’s books as extremist.
On December 5, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Bashkortostan reported that the prosecutor's office of the Aurgazinsky district through the court ordered the telecom operator Bashinformsvyaz to block the site containing the text of Yuri Mukhin's book "It's a shame for the state!" Let us remember that despite the fact that Mukhin’s book contains xenophobic statements, its ban was formally unlawful . In addition, we oppose blocking an entire site because of one prohibited material.
On November 18, 2013, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Veshkaimsky district of the Ulyanovsk region submitted a submission to the director of the Ulyanovsk branch of OJSC Rostelecom, in which it demanded to limit access to sites on which, during an inspection, materials included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials were found. Among the resources subject to blocking, according to the prosecutor's office, is the large network library libok.net.
On November 13, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Krasnoyarsk Territory reported that the prosecutor's office of the Evenki Autonomous Okrug had submitted a proposal to eliminate violations of the law to the provider of MP EMR "CITS", which provides Internet communications in the Ilimpiysk region. The reason was that the provider did not block access to the recognized extremist site "Ingushetia" (apparently one of the successors of the site "Ingushetia.ru"). Let us remind you that from our point of view, the ban on this site and its successors was unlawful. The request of the prosecutor's office was fulfilled by the provider.
On November 1, 2013, a number of providers, including Rostelecom and Beeline, blocked the website of the social platform “It’s a Small World.” The reason for the blocking was the decision of the Leninsky District Court of Samara, which ordered the blocking of access to the banned book “Removal of Doubts” by Muhammad ibn Suleiman al-Tamimi, excerpts from which were posted on one of the platform’s blogs. However, the court did not notify either the site administration or Roskomnadzor about its decision. When, contrary to a court decision, providers mistakenly blocked not a single blog, but the entire site, the site administration, ready to immediately remove the prohibited content, for a long time could not find out the reason for the blocking. As a result, the quickest way out for site owners was to change the IP, which they did without waiting for the providers to figure out the situation. This incident reflects the imperfection of the system for blocking prohibited content in the Russian segment of the Internet.
On October 17, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Stavropol Territory reported that the prosecutor's office of the Leninsky district of Stavropol appealed to the Leninsky district court with a demand to oblige the Rostelecom provider to limit access to the litmir.net online library due to the fact that the banned book "Hunter" was posted on its pages. Andrew MacDonald. Let us remind you that from our point of view, blocking an entire resource because of one material is inappropriate and illegal.
On October 15, 2013, it became known about the decision of the judicial panel for civil cases of the Volgograd Regional Court, which confirmed the decision of the Central District Court of Kamyshin of the Volgograd Region on the obligation of Rostelecom OJSC to limit access to extremist materials in schools No. 5, No. 6 and the secondary school of Kamyshin. The reason for the lawsuit by the Kamyshin prosecutor's office was the results of an audit that revealed that prohibited materials were accessible from school computers. It is impossible to understand from the press service of the court whether the schools had a content filtering system, but we assume that otherwise it would have been indicated that it did not exist. An indirect indication of the presence of filters can also be an appeal against the decision of the first instance court filed by the defendant.
On September 25, 2013, it became known about the claim of the prosecutor's office of the Novoaleksandrovsky district of the Stavropol Territory in the Leninsky district court of Stavropol, which contained a demand for JSC Rostelecom to limit access to the popular Internet library RoyalLib.ru. The reason for the lawsuit was Dmitry Nesterov’s book “Skins: Rus' Awakens” discovered on the website, which was included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On July 15, 2013, the Kirovsky District Court of Samara upheld the claim of the district prosecutor's office and ordered local providers to limit access to the site on which the banned brochure by Ahmad ibn Hadjar Allu Butami "Cleansing the heart and body from the dirt of polytheism and unbelief" is posted. The book is dedicated to explaining the meaning and significance of the ritual side of Islam and, from our point of view, does not contain signs of extremism, therefore we regard the blocking of the site, as well as the banning of the book, as unlawful actions.
On July 11, 2013, it became known about a lawsuit against the providers Maxima+ LLC, Novline LLC, Rostelecom OJSC, Alfakom LLC, filed in the Novgorod District Court by the prosecutor's office of the Novgorod region, which contained a requirement to restrict access to the Witnesses website Jehovah (probably referring to www.jw.org), since it contains texts included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials. The claim was satisfied, access to the site is limited. Let us remind you that we consider it unlawful to ban the literature of Jehovah's Witnesses, as well as to block sites that are not recognized as extremist, just because they contain several extremist materials.
On June 27, 2013, it became known about a statement of claim against the Tula branch of OJSC Rostelecom, with which the prosecutor's office of the Dubensky district of the Tula region appealed to the Odoevsky district court of the Tula region. In the lawsuit, the prosecutor's office demanded that the provider limit access to extremist sites discovered during an inspection of Dubenskaya and Voskresenskaya secondary schools, citing the fact that OJSC Rostelecom, in accordance with an agreement concluded with schools, filters content. The proceedings in the case were terminated due to the voluntary compliance with the demands of the prosecutor's office. The information message does not say anything about the absence of content filters on school computers, from which one can conclude that filters were installed.
On June 24, 2013, it became known that the prosecutor's office of Surgut (KhMAO) filed lawsuits against the Tyumen branch of Vympel-Communications OJSC and the Ural branch of MegaFon OJSC, which demanded to limit access to the websites of the National Bolshevik Party (NBP) and the "Slavic Power" movement, as well as "other extremist organizations." Let us recall that in our opinion, the ban on the NBP as extremist was unlawful. In addition, a ban on an organization under Russian law does not entail an automatic ban on its materials and websites. Websites should be blocked only after a reasoned court decision has been made to ban them.
On June 13, 2013, the Krasnodar prosecutor's office reported that according to its claim against eight providers of the city (Astarta CJSC, Kubintersvyaz, Prestige Internet, Kuban State University, VimpelCom OJSC, MegaFon, MTS, LLC "Kubtelecom") Leninsky and Oktyabrsky district courts of Krasnodar ordered to block access to sites with the book "Zhuan Falun", the brochure "Report on the verification of allegations of organ harvesting from Falun Gong followers in China", as well as lectures by Ron Hubbard. Let us remind you that we consider the recognition of Falun Dafa materials and Hubbard’s texts as extremist to be unfounded and unlawful. In addition, we are against blocking entire sites because of one material; in such cases, individual pages should be blocked.
On June 3, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Chuvashia reported that the Novocheboksarsk City Court sentenced the head of a local provider company to a fine of 2,000 rubles under Art. 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (production and distribution of extremist materials) for failing to restrict user access to materials prohibited for extremism on the Internet. We consider this decision unlawful, since Art. 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Offenses provides for punishment for an intentional offense, and not for an offense committed through negligence.
On May 27, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Sverdlovsk region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Prigorodny district sent a statement of claim to the court against the Yekaterinburg branch of OJSC Rostelecom with a demand to oblige the defendant to limit by IP blocking access to the site containing information about the activities of the Hizb ut-Tahrir party, on the basis that it is banned in Russia as terrorist. Since a ban on an organization under Russian law does not entail an automatic ban on its materials and websites, we consider the actions of the prosecutor’s office unlawful. A website should be blocked only after a reasoned court decision has been made to ban it.
On April 24, 2013, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Pervomaisky district of Vladivostok made a submission to the director of the Far East macro-regional branch of Rostelecom OJSC, in which it demanded that videos “ similar in content to the video clip “Last interview” be removed from the video hosting dsv.video.disland.ru Primorsky partisans" included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials ." The request of the prosecutor's office has been fulfilled. In our opinion, the actions of the prosecutor’s office are unlawful, since the prosecutor’s office does not speak about the identity of these materials as prohibited, and they themselves were not recognized as extremist in court.
On April 18, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Samara region reported that, following a claim from the city prosecutor's office, the Leninsky District Court of Samara ordered the providers Kraft-S LLC and Kraft-Telecom LLC to block access to the "official websites of the Hizb ut-Tahrir Russia party" on the basis that that the Hizb ut-Tahrir party is banned in Russia as a terrorist party. Since a ban on an organization under Russian law does not entail an automatic ban on its materials and websites, we consider the decision of the Leninsky District Court of Samara to be unlawful. Websites should be blocked only after a reasoned court decision to ban them was made.
On April 17, 2013, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Lagansky district of the Republic of Kalmykia sent a statement of claim to restrict access to extremist materials to the management of the Kalmyk branch of OJSC Rostelecom. The reason for the lawsuits was that content filters installed on school computers “ do not restrict students’ access ” to prohibited sites; At the same time, the prosecutor's office assigns " direct management " of filtering Internet content in schools to Rostelecom.
On April 15, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Nizhny Novgorod region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Moskovsky district of Nizhny Novgorod sent 6 statements of claim to the district court against the providers Tekhnologiya LLC and UNIT LLC demanding "by filtering traffic or completely blocking access to the corresponding Internet site" to restrict access to a number of prohibited materials, including the text of the book "Fruits of Faith" from the collected works of Said Nursi "Risale-i-Nur". We believe that this book was declared extremist inappropriately. The claims are pending.
On April 10, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Kirov district of the city of Ufa announced that during an inspection it had discovered a banned book by Yuri Mukhin, “It’s a shame for the state!” on 13 Internet sites. Based on the results of the inspection, the district prosecutor's office sent 39 statements of claim to the Kirovsky District Court of Ufa against the Internet providers TTK-Center LLC, BashTelecomService LLC, and Cellular Communications of Bashkortostan OJSC to restrict access to these sites. Applications are currently under consideration. Let us note that, from our point of view, Mukhin’s book was illegally banned. In addition, we are against blocking entire sites because of one material; in such cases, individual pages should be blocked.
On April 3, 2013, it became known that the prosecutor's offices of the Dobrinsky, Lev-Tolstovsky districts of the Lipetsk region and the Sovetsky district of Lipetsk ordered local Internet providers to limit access to extremist materials possible from computers installed in the school. Representatives of the Lipetsk Region prosecutor's office specifically emphasized that all schools are equipped with content filtering systems.
On March 28, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Sverdlovsk region reported that the Verkh-Isetsky district court of Yekaterinburg satisfied the demands of the prosecutor's office of the Talitsky district and ordered the Ural branch of Rostelecom OJSC to restrict access to the Internet page on which the brochure "The need to comply with the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah" is posted. (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)", recognized as extremist among 17 religious materials in Buguruslan, Orenburg region. From our point of view, this brochure does not contain signs of extremism and was banned unlawfully.
On March 21, 2013, the prosecutor's office of the Ulyanovsk region reported that the prosecutor's office of the Inzensky district filed a lawsuit seeking an obligation for the Ulyanovsk branch of OJSC Rostelecom to block access to several sites recognized as extremist. Among them are the sites “Ingushetia Online” and angusht.com, which, from our point of view, were banned without proper grounds solely for their opposition.
On March 19, 2013, the Kirovsky district of Samara made a decision to restrict access to the site on which the book “Gardens of the Righteous” by Imam al-Nawawi, banned in March 2012 by the Leninsky District Court of Orenburg, is posted. From the point of view of the prosecutor's office, "the publication contains calls for extremist activities, terrorist acts, and incitement to hatred." Let us remember that we are talking about a treatise from the 13th century.
On January 24, 2013, the Prosecutor's Office of the Arkhangelsk Region reported that the Prosecutor's Office of Arkhangelsk went to court with a demand to oblige the local operator OJSC VimpelCom to block access to the recognized extremist brochure "What Does the Bible Really Teach?", available for download on the Jehovah's Witnesses website www. jw.org. In court, the defendant agreed to voluntarily comply with the demands of the prosecutor's office, after which the proceedings in the case were discontinued. Let us remind you that we consider the ban on materials of Jehovah's Witnesses to be unlawful.
On December 25, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Lev-Tolstovsky district of the Lipetsk region announced a claim to exclude the technical possibility of access to extremist material, filed against a branch of Rostelecom OJSC operating in the Lipetsk region. The reason for the statement was that, despite the installed content filters, there was access to extremist material from a computer in the computer science room of a school in the village of Kuzovlevo, Lev-Tolstovsky district. It is reported that the claims have been fully satisfied.
On December 4, 2012, it became known about seven claims of the prosecutor's office of the Kirov district of Samara against the providers Svyazinvest LLC, Lan-Sites LLC, Inginium LLC, Samara-Koss CJSC, filed in the district court, about restricting access to sites, who posted the texts of books included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials: “The Fortress of a Muslim. Appeal to Allah with Supplications” by Said bin Ali bin Waqf al-Qahtani, “Prophet Muhammad Mustafa” by Osman Nuri Topbash, “Admonition to Rulers” by Abu Hamid al-Ghazali. Let us remind you that we consider the recognition of these books as extremist to be unlawful .
On November 19, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Stavropol Territory announced that the Leninsky District Court of Stavropol satisfied the claim of the prosecutor of the Novoaleksandrovsky district of the city and ordered the provider OJSC Rostelecom to limit access to the sites rashanasha.ru, cultlib.alfaspace.net and the online library rulit.net , since they were “allowed to post materials containing calls for extremist activities, terrorist acts, incitement of hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of the dignity of a person or group of persons, which is confirmed by linguistic research.” From our point of view, the decision to block the last two sites entirely was unlawful; only individual pages should have been blocked.
On November 6, 2012, it became known about a proposal to eliminate violations of the law and a warning about the inadmissibility of extremist activity, announced to the head of the Western interdistrict communication center of the Krasnodar branch of Rostelecom OJSC by the prosecutor's office of the Bryukhovetsky district of the Krasnodar Territory. The reason for the response was that computers installed in schools in the district had access to extremist materials. A number of schools in the district did not install content filters, but the provider cannot be held responsible for this.
On October 12, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Astrakhan region reported that it had filed five lawsuits demanding that providers be obliged to block 45 Internet pages on which the film "The Innocence of Muslims" was posted. This measure is premature, since the decision of the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow to ban the film on October 1, 2012 has not yet entered into force.
On October 11, 2012, the Primorsky Territory prosecutor's office reported that the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases upheld the appeal of the Vladivostok prosecutor's office and ordered local providers to block access to the site on which a leaflet containing "negative assessments of the national-confessional group of Jews" was posted. Previously, the Leninsky District Court rejected the prosecutor's office's corresponding claim. We regard the decision of the appellate court as unlawful, since we consider it unlawful to block materials and sites before they are recognized as extremist in court.
On October 9, 2012, the Tula prosecutor's office, as part of the fight against the distribution of the film "The Innocence of Muslims", announced warnings against violations of the law by local providers. This measure is premature, since the decision of the Tver District Court of Moscow on the ban on the film of October 1, 2012 has not yet entered into force.
On October 9, 2012, it became known that the Sterlitamak prosecutor's office (the Republic of Bashkortostan) announced a warning about the inadmissibility of violations of the law to the director of the Internet provider of the city telecommunication network LLC " In order to stop the spread of" Muslim Innocent ". This measure is premature, since the decision of the Tver District Court of Moscow on the ban on the film of October 1, 2012 has not yet entered into force.
On October 8, 2012, the Bashkiria Prosecutor's Office, as part of the fight against the spread of the film "Invalidity of Muslims", made an idea of eliminating violations of the legislation on counteracting extremism to 20 local providers. These measures are premature, since the decision of the Tver District Court of Moscow on the ban on the film of October 1, 2012 has not yet entered into force.
On October 5, 2012, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Samara region announced the warnings to 47 Internet providers of the region and said that all prosecutors of the region were instructed to file court claims to restrict access to sites with the film "Innocent Muslims". From our point of view, these requirements are unlawful, since because of one material one should not deprive users of access to the entire resource.
On October 4, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Jewish Autonomous Region reported on the inadmissibility of violation of the law on counteracting extremist activities to three providers working in the region and demanded that you block access to YouTube and other sites on which the film "Innocent Muslims" is located. From our point of view, these requirements are unlawful, since because of one material one should not deprive users of access to the entire resource.
On October 3, 2012 it became known that in Altai local providers blocked access to the popular online library "Librusek". The reason was the request of the prosecutor's office to close access to extremist materials posted on the library's pages. Since the providers were technically unable to block individual pages of Librusek, they blocked the entire resource.
On October 2, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Mordovia reported that she issued 10 local providers of a warning with a demand to block access to resources, which posted the film "Muslim Invivity". From our point of view, these requirements are unlawful, since because of one material one should not deprive users of access to the entire resource.
On October 1, 2012, before the Tver Court of Moscow, the decision to ban the film "Innocence of Muslims" in the Krasnodar Territory local providers Beeline (Vimpelcom) and Irbis-Telecom blocked access to YouTube and some other sites on which the film is laid out. Representatives of the companies explained their actions with the instructions of Roskomnadzor and the prosecutor's office.
On October 1, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Ivanovo region said that the prosecutor's office of the Soviet district Ivanova made an idea of the local provider of Intercomle LLC demanding to limit access to the Jehovah's Witnesses website. Recall that no Jehovah's witnesses in Russia are prohibited, and we consider the recognition of materials from Jehovah's witnesses to extremist.
On October 1, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Stavropol Territory reported that the prosecutor's office of the Ipatovsky district filed a lawsuit against the Stavropol branch of Rostelecom OJSC demanding to limit access to the site with the text of the recognized extremist book Abu Hamid al-Gazali "Instruction to the rulers". We do not know what other materials this site contains, however, blocking access to it only because it contains a medieval theological treatise, prohibited, from our point of view, unlawful.
On October 1, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Kostroma region reported that at the request of the Kostroma prosecutor’s office, the local provider of KGTS LLC established restrictions on access to video files “Muslim Innocial”. Recall that the lawsuit on recognizing the film "Innocence of Muslims" by extremist entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17 and has not yet been considered.
On October 1, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Tomsk and Astrakhan regions reported that the prosecutor's office of both regions to local providers made warnings on the inadmissibility of violations of the legislation on counteracting extremist activities in connection with the distribution of Muslims Innoconcy in the network. Cautions with the requirement to block resources with the film are announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film by extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 28, 2012, in the Republic of Buryatia, providers working in the republic (OJSC Rostelecom, Megafon OJSC, Vimpelcom OJSC, CJSC Treestelecom, CJSC Sinterra, Baikalvest CJSC), blocked access to the website of witnesses Jehovah http://www.jw.org . The access was blocked by the decision of the Soviet District Court of Ulan-Ude on June 19, 2012 due to the fact that the site was found on the site during the verification of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Buryatia, “What is the Bible really teaches?”, In 2009, recognized in the extremist decision of Rostovsky The regional court and included in the federal list of extremist materials. Recall that no Jehovah's witnesses in Russia are prohibited, and we consider the recognition of materials from Jehovah's witnesses to extremist.
On September 28, 2012 it became known that the Rybinsk City Prosecutor's Office announced the inadmissibility of violations of the law on counteracting extremist activities to three Internet providers working in the Rybinsk and Rybinsk district of the Yaroslavl region-LLC "Company" RTS, LLC " ATEX PLUS ". Cautions are announced in connection with the distribution of Muslims Innocent on the network. Response measures were applied despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on recognizing the film by extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and was not yet considered before the decision of the Leninsky District Court of Grozny recognized the film as extremist.
On September 27, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Chelyabinsk region and the Kamensk-Uralsky Sverdlovsk region reported that they made warning to local providers about the inadmissibility of violations of the legislation on counteracting extremist activities in connection with the distribution of Muslims Innocent in the network. Cautions with the requirement to block resources with the film are announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film by extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 27, 2012 it became known that the “big three” of mobile operators-Megafon, Beeline and MTS-in response to the requirements of prosecutors and Roskomnadzor blocked access to the film “Innocent Muslims” in the regions of the South and the Caucasus: in Chechnya, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria , Karachay-Cherkessia, North Ossetia and the Stavropol Territory. MTS and megaphone closed access to individual pages containing a video, while Beeline was completely blocked by access to YouTube.ru and YouTube.com. In Ingushetia, Beeline closed access to YouTube and Google, the rest of the operators have not yet been introduced. Representatives of Megaphone said that they are taking measures to block access to the film everywhere, regardless of the region. Recall that the Tver court of Moscow should begin consideration of the case on the prohibition of the "Innocation of Muslims" on October 1.
On September 27, 2012, the VKontakte social network deleted the film "Innocent Muslims" from its pages. Recall, on September 20, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of St. Petersburg issued VKontakte networks on the inadmissibility of violations of the legislation on counteracting extremist activities in connection with the spread of the film, but the network administration stated that it would not take any action until the film is recognized as extremist. Meanwhile, the court in the case of the ban on the film should begin only on October 1, 2012.
On September 26, 2012, the Smolensk Prosecutor's Office reported 20 warnings about the inadmissibility of extremist activities announced by the region’s Internet service providers as measures called up blocked access to the film "Innocent Muslims". Cautions with the requirement to block resources with the film are announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film by extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 25, 2012, the Uglich Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of the Yaroslavl Region, as well as the prosecutor's office of the Republics of Karelia and Tatarstan, reported that they made warnings to local providers about the inadmissibility of violations of the law on countering extremist activities in connection with the spread of Muslim Invisibility in the network. Cautions with the requirement to block resources with the film are announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film by extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 24, 2012, it became known that in a number of republics of the North Caucasus, some providers, in response to the warnings announced by the local prosecutors on the inadmissibility of violations of the legislation on counteracting extremist activities in connection with the distribution of Muslim Innocence on the network, blocked access to Youtube resource. In Dagestan, access to YouTube was closed by Summer-Telecom and Eralline providers, on Thursday it was blocked by the Optica-Telecom Provider. In Chechnya, due to warnings issued on September 18, four providers were blocked by access to the resource: Vainyn Telecom CJSC, Chechen cellular CJSC, Orange OJSC and FSUE Electrosvyaz. It should be noted that the warnings with the requirement to block resources with the film are announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on recognizing the film with extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 24, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Vologda Oblast and the Krasnoyarsk Territory reported that, following the order of the Prosecutor General’s Office, they made warning to local providers about the inadmissibility of violations of the legislation on counteracting extremist activities in connection with the distribution of Muslims Innocent in the network. Repeated warnings to providers who did not close access to the film were issued on September 24 the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic. Cautions with the requirement to block resources with the film are announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film by extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 21, 2012, a number of regional prosecutors (Prosecutor's Office of the Primorsky and Krasnodar Territory, Kaluga and Kursk regions, republics of North Ossetia, Udmurtia and Tuva, several subjects of the North-West Federal District), fulfilling the order of the Prosecutor General’s Office, issued to local providers about the inadmissibility of violations of the legislation on counteraction extremist activity in connection with the spread of the film "Innocence of Muslims" on the network. Cautions with the requirement to block resources with the film are announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film by extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Belgorod region said that due to the fact that there is free access to the film "Invquected Muslims", she announced warnings on the inadmissibility of violation of the law to the leaders of 34 providers ("comet", "Vimpeltelecom", "Gorptus" , "Reinfocom", "Oskolnet", etc.). The warnings were announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film was received by extremist material in the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012, it became known about the presentation made by the prosecutor's office of Tatarstan to the general director of the social network VKontakte. The reason for the response measure was the open group of the National Bolsheviks of Tatarstan found as a result of the audit (157 participants at the time of the audit). The prosecutor’s performance is considered, access to the group page is blocked. Recall that we do not consider the ban on the NBP and, therefore, all the legal consequences of this ban.
On September 20, 2012, it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Kemerovo region announced warnings on the inadmissibility of violations of the law to the heads of 5 Internet providers of the region. The reason for warnings was the users of the Kemerovo region access to the film "Innocence of Muslims" on the YouTube video hosting. The warnings were announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film was received by extremist material in the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012, it became known that the prosecutor's office of St. Petersburg announced warning about the inadmissibility of violations of the law and the need to block access to the film "Innocence of Muslims" " The largest communications organizations that provide services to the Internet in St. Petersburg ." The prosecutor's office also said that " measures were taken to remove copies of the specified video material posted on the VKontakte social network ." The warnings were announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film was received by extremist material in the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Kamchatka Territory reported that she announced warnings about the inadmissibility of extremist activities to all communications operators in the Kamchatka Territory. The reason for the warnings was the residents of the region access to the film "Innocent Muslims". The warnings were announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film was received by extremist material in the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012, it became known that the Teikovsky Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of the Ivanovo Region revealed a “number of sites”, in which the film “Innocent Muslims”, and therefore announced the warning to the regional Internet provider Data-Line LLC. The warning was announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on recognizing the film by extremist material entered the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012, it became known that the Prosecutor's Office of the Stavropol Territory announced a warning about the inadmissibility of violation of the law to 4 providers providing access to the Internet in the territory of the region. The reason for the warnings was the residents of the region access to the film "Innocence of Muslims" on YouTube. The warnings were announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film was received by extremist material in the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012, the prosecutor's office of the Ryazan region said that she announced warnings on the inadmissibility of violations of the legislation to 12 Internet providers of the region and demanded that immediate measures aimed at blocking access to sites on which the film "Invited Muslims" is posted. The warnings were announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film was received by extremist material in the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012, the Prosecutor's Office of the Murmansk Region reported on the inadmissibility of violations of the law announced by the prosecutor's office of the Murmansk region, the prosecutor's office of the Oktyabrsky, Leninsky and Pervomaisky districts of Murmansk 12 Regional Internet providers: ZAO Rostelecom, the Murmansk branch of Vimpelcom OJSC, and the Murmansk branch of OAO " MTS ”, CJSC“ Tele-2 Murmansk ”, CJSC Delta-Telecom, LLC“ MMS ”, Murmansk branch of the National Security and Defense Council of OJSC Megaphone, LLC“ Televio-Radio Company Kandalaksha ”, LLC“ Firm Relanent ”, CJSC Elvis. The reason for warnings was the residents of the district access to the film "Innocence of Muslims", "originally placed" on YouTube video hosting. The warnings were announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film was received by extremist material in the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered.
On September 20, 2012 it became known that the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Buryatia announced warnings to six providers represented in Buryatia: OJSC Mobile TeleSystems, Megafon OJSC, Vimpel -Commercial OJSC, Baikalvestsk CJSC, Rostelekom OJSC, OJSC, LLC "Bix+". The reason for the warnings was the residents of the region access to the film "Innocent Muslims". The warnings were announced despite the fact that the lawsuit of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation on the recognition of the film was received by extremist material in the Tver court of Moscow on September 17, 2012 and has not yet been considered. At the same time, the representative of the prosecutor’s office emphasized that the providers are ordered to block not YouTube in general, but only the specific addresses on which the film is posted, but not all operators have such a technical opportunity.
20 сентября 2012 года прокуратура Хабаровского края сообщила о предостережениях о недопустимости нарушения закона, объявленных прокуратурами Хабаровска и Комсомольска-на-Амуре руководителям интернет-провайдеров, базирующихся в Хабаровске и Комсомольске-на-Амуре. Поводом для предостережений стал имеющийся у жителей края доступ к фильму "Невинность мусульман". Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен. В тот же день представители провайдеров Хабаровского края заявили, что не намерены блокировать доступ до решения суда.
20 сентября 2012 года прокуратура Чукотского автономного округа сообщила о предостережениях о недопустимости нарушения закона, вынесенных в адрес 4 интернет-провайдеров, представленных на Чукотке. Поводом для предостережений стал имеющийся у жителей округа доступ к фильму "Невинность мусульман", "изначально размещенному" на видеохостинге YouTube. Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен.
20 сентября 2012 года стало известно, что прокуратура ХМАО – Югры объявила 24 предостережения о недопустимости осуществления экстремистской деятельности руководителям региональных интернет-провайдеров (Ханты-Мансийский филиал ОАО "Ростелеком", ООО "Линк", ОАО "Северсвязь", ООО "ЮНИКОМ" и etc.). Поводом для предостережений стал имеющийся у жителей региона доступ к фильму "Невинность мусульман" на YouTube, "а также на иных ресурсах". Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен.
20 сентября 2012 года прокуратура Нижегородской области сообщила предостережениях, объявленных 34 провайдерам, оказывающим услуги по доступу в интернет на территории области. Поводом для предостережений стал имеющийся у жителей Нижегородской области доступ к фильму "Невинность мусульман", "изначально размещенному" на YouTube. Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен.
19 сентября 2012 года прокуратура Республики Ингушетия объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона провайдерам, действующим в республике (количество не сообщается). Поводом для предостережений стал имеющийся у пользователей Ингушетии доступ к фильму "Невинность мусульман". Прокуратура сообщает, что принятые меры направленны " на блокирование региональными поставщиками услуг связи доступа пользователей к Интернет-ресурсам, на которых размещен видеофильм ". Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен. 20 сентября 2012 года стало известно, что провайдеры Ингушетии отказались блокировать доступ без решения суда.
19 сентября 2012 года прокуратура Республики Хакасия объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона 11 провайдерам, предоставляющим доступ в интернет на территории республики. Поводом для предостережений стал имеющийся у пользователей Хакасии доступ к фильму "Невинность мусульман". Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен.
19 сентября 2012 года прокуратура Чеченской Республики объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона семи провайдерам, представленным на территории республики – ЗАО "Вайнах Телеком", ГГМТС ФГУП "Электросвязь", ОАО "МТС", ЗАО "Чеченская сотовая связь", ООО "Оранж", филиала ОАО "Мегафон" в ЧР и Грозненского филиала ОАО "Вымпелком". Поводом для предостережений стал имеющийся у жителей Чеченской Республики доступ к фильму "Невинность мусульман" на YouTube. Прокуратура потребовала пресечь " распространение данного видеоматериала " и блокировать " доступ пользователей к Интернет-ресурсам, на которых размещен фильм ". Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен.
19 сентября 2012 года стало известно, что прокуратура Республики Алтай объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона действующим в республике интернет-провайдерам – ООО "Эл-Телеком", ООО "ОНГНЕТ", ООО "ОНРЭЛА", Алтайское региональное отделение Сибирского филиала ОАО "Мегафон", Горно-Алтайский филиал ОАО "Ростелеком". Меры реагирования приняты, поскольку у пользователей Республики Алтай имеется доступ к видеохостингу YouTube, на котором размещен трейлер фильм "Невинность мусульман", и потребовала закрыть доступ к фильму. Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен.
19 сентября 2012 года прокуратура Кабардино-Балкарской Республики сообщила о предостережениях о недопустимости нарушения закона, объявленных основным республиканским провайдерам в связи с имеющимся доступом к фильму "Невинность мусульман". Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен. " С учетом экстремистского характера " материала и " общественного резонанса, вызванного его размещением в сети Интернет ", прокуратура КБР обязала провайдеров ограничить к нему доступ до рассмотрения судом заявления Генеральной прокуратуры РФ. Поручения о принятии аналогичных мер направлены в территориальные подразделения прокуратуры и в Управление Роскомнадзора.
19 сентября 2012 года стало известно, что прокуратура Омской области объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона руководителям регионального отделения Сибирского филиала ОАО "МегаФон", филиалов ОАО "Ростелеком", "МТС", "ВымпелКом" и Омского регионального представительства ЗАО "Зап-СибТранстелеком" . Поводом для предостережений стало то, что в пользователи области имели доступ к видеохостингу YouTube, на котором размещен трейлер фильма "Невинность мусульман" (скандального любительского фильма о пророке Мухаммеда, появление которого вызвало протест сразу в нескольких странах мусульманского мира). Предостережения объявлены несмотря на то, что иск Генеральной прокуратуры РФ о признании фильма экстремистским материалом поступил в Тверской суд Москвы 17 сентября 2012 года и еще не рассмотрен. Прокуратура письмом потребовала принять меры по блокировке доступа к фильму, в результате чего "Ростелеком" на семь часов заблокировал доступ ко всему YouTube на территории Омской области.
11 сентября 2012 года стало известно, что Надымский городской суд ЯНАО по иску прокуратуры Надыма обязал окружной филиал ОАО "Ростелеком" ограничить доступ к сайтам narod.ru и zhurnal.lib.ru в связи с тем, что на них обнаружены материалы, включенные в Федеральный список экстремистских материалов. Ограничение доступа по решению суда должно осуществляться путем фильтрации IP-адреса на пограничном маршрутизаторе. В результате городской провайдер "ВКС-Интернет" прекратил доступ ко всем ресурсам доменов lib.ru и narod.ru. Напомним, сетевой журнал "Самиздат" при библиотеке Мошкова уже был запрещен в апреле 2009 года Череповецким городским судом Вологодской области из-за статей одного автора, после чего журнал переехал на новый адрес.
16 августа 2012 года стало известно, что 11 июля 2012 года Ленинский районный суд Ставрополя удовлетворил иск, поданный прокуратурой Ставропольского края к ОАО "Вымпелком" и ОАО "МегаФон" . Прокуратура требовала от провайдеров запретить доступ к ряду сайтов, признанных экстремистскими. Среди сайтов, доступ к которым предписано заблокировать, – популярный татарский портал tatarlar.ru и сайт НБП , запрет которых мы считаем неправомерным.
14 августа 2012 года прокуратура Курска сообщила, что вынесла 13 предостережений о недопустимости нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремистской деятельности провайдерам, работающим в Курской области. Поводом для предупреждений стало то, что пользователи интернета в области имели доступ к сайту Свидетелей Иеговы. Требование прокуратуры было выполнено, доступ к сайту заблокирован. Напомним, никакие сайты Свидетелей Иеговы в России не запрещены, а признание материалов Свидетелей Иеговы экстремистскими мы считаем неправомерным.
10 августа 2012 года прокуратура Красноярского края сообщила, что Енисейской межрайонной прокуратурой было внесено представление в адрес местного провайдера ООО "ЕнисейСвязьСервис" с требованием блокировать доступ к сайту Свидетелей Иеговы. Требование прокуратуры было выполнено. Напомним, никакие сайты Свидетелей Иеговы в России не запрещены, поводом для блокировки послужило то, что на сайте размещены материалы Свидетелей Иеговы, признанные экстремистскими, однако мы считаем, что последние были запрещены неправомерно.
3 августа 2012 года "Известия" сообщили, что прокурор Железнодорожного района Рязани обратился с иском к сотовому оператору "МегаФон" в Замоскворецкий суд Москвы (по месту регистрации компании). Прокурор требует, чтобы "МегаФон" ограничил доступ пользователей к ряду сайтов, на которых выложена признанная экстремистской книга Владимира Истархова "Удар русских богов". В их числе оказался YouTube, на котором размещена аудиоверсия книги. Сообщается, что работники рязанской прокуратуры добивались блокировки YouTube и от местного филиала компании "Ростелеком", однако безуспешно: "пока тянулись судебные процессы о закрытии доступа к YouTube, администрация этого ресурса по обращению российских компетентных органов снимала противозаконные материалы, и предмет иска исчезал" .
17 июля 2012 года стало известно, что Ярославский областной суд подтвердил решение Кировского районного суда Ярославля, который по ходатайству районной прокуратуры обязал местного провайдера "Нетис Телеком" заблокировать доступ к блог-платформе Livejournal.com. Поводом для блокировки ресурса явилось стремление прокуратуры закрыть доступ к одному из блогов: признанному экстремистским в 2009 году дневнику pat-index.livejournal com. Попытка "Нетис Телеком" оспорить решение районного суда в областном не увенчалась успехом, и 6000 абонентов лишились доступа к ЖЖ. 20 июля 2012 года провайдер открыл доступ пользователям к Livejournal.com и заявил о намерении продолжать требовать отмены судебного решения, приравнивающего провайдера к распространителю информации.
11 июля 2012 года стало известно об иске, поданном в Калужский районный суд прокуратурой Калуги к ОАО "ЦентрТелеком" в связи с тем, что в калужских гимназии № 19, лицеях № 9, 36, школах № 3, 5, 11, 12, 14 и детском доме № 3 оказался возможен доступ к материалам экстремистского характера. В соответствии с договорами между ОАО "ЦентрТелеком" и школами фильтрация контента осуществлялась провайдером централизованно, однако не была " обеспечена полная защита ".
4 июля 2012 года стало известно об иске, поданном прокуратурой Добринского района Липецкой области к местному филиалу ОАО "Ростелеком" об ограничении доступа на территории Липецкой области к сайтам путем применения правил фильтрации на DNS серверах. Названия сайтов не сообщаются. Иск был подан в связи с тем, что в школе поселка Петровский имелся доступ к " сайтам, содержащим экстремистские материалы ". Суд требования прокуратуры удовлетворил. Из сообщения прокуратуры при этом следует, что на школьных компьютерах были установлены контент-фильтры.
2 июля 2012 года прокуратура Новоалександровского района Ставропольского края сообщила, что направила исковое заявление к ОАО "Ростелеком" об ограничении доступа к сайтам, на которых размещены экстремистские материалы. Среди сайтов, доступ к которым требуется заблокировать, - интернет-библиотека http://www.rulit.net.

Sources

Благодаря вмешательству прокуратуры устранены нарушения законодательства в сфере противодействия экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Кемеровской области. 2012. July 2.
Прокуратурой Новоалександровского района направлено исковое заявление в суд к ОАО «Ростелеком» об ограничении доступа к Интернет-сайтам, на страницах которых размещены материалы экстремистского характера // Сайт прокуратуры Ставропольского края. 2012. July 2.
Заместитель прокурора области Долбин А.И.: 1.09.2012 вступает в силу Федеральный закон № 436-ФЗ "О защите детей от информации, причиняющей вред их здоровью и развитию" // Сайт прокуратуры Липецкой области. 2012. 4 июля.
Прокуратура города Калуги в судебном порядке требует запретить доступ школьников к сайтам в сети Интернет экстремистского, порнографического и эротического характера // Сайт прокуратуры Калужской области. 2012. July 11.
Михаил Контуев. Прокуратора Кировского района закрыла ярославцам доступ в интернет-дневники // Эхо Москвы-Ярославль. 2012. July 17.
Процесс пошел // Блог Андрея Мальгина. 2012. July 18.
Интернет-провайдер открыл жителям Ярославля доступ к LiveJournal // РИА Новости. 2012. July 20.
Прокуратура требует закрыть доступ к YouTube // Известия. 2012. August 3.
По требованию Енисейского межрайонного прокурора прекращен доступ к сайту, содержащему экстремистские материалы // Сайт прокуратуры Красноярского края. 2012. 10 августа.
Курская прокуратура закрыла доступ к сайту «Свидетелей Иеговы» // Сайт прокуратуры Курской области. 2012. August 14.
По иску прокуратуры края ограничен доступ к экстремистским сайтам // Сайт прокуратуры Ставропольского края. 2012. August 16.
Суд Надыма закрыл за экстремизм старейшую интернет-библиотеку // Национальный акцент. 2012. September 11.
Прокуратура Надыма ограничила доступ к экстремистским сайтам // Новый регион. 2012. September 11.
Прокуратура Омской области объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона руководителям пяти Интернет-провайдеров региона // Сайт прокуратуры Омской области. 2012. September 19.
«Ростелеком» объяснил, зачем блокировал доступ к Youtube в Омской области // Ведомости. 2012. September 19.
Прокуратурой КБР объявлены предостережения поставщикам (провайдерам) услуг Интернет об ограничении доступа жителей республики к видеофильму «Невинность мусульман» («Невинность ислама»)» // Сайт прокуратуры КБР. 2012. September 19.
Прокуратура Республики Алтай направила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона руководителям пяти интернет-провайдеров региона // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Алтай. 2012. September 19.
Прокурор Чечни выступил против экстремизма // Сайт прокуратуры Чеченской Республики. 2012. September 19.
Прокуратура Хакасии объявила руководителям интернет-провайдеров предостережения о недопустимости нарушений законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Хакасия. 2012. September 19.
Прокуратурой Республики Ингушетия объявлены предостережения поставщикам (провайдерам) услуг интернет об ограничении доступа жителей республики к видеофильму "Невинность мусульман" ("Невинность ислама") // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Ингушетия. 2012. September 19.
Органы прокуратуры Нижегородской области требуют ограничить доступ к скандальному видеоролику // Сайт прокуратуры Нижегородской области. 2012. September 20.
Прокуроры Югры требуют ограничить доступ к скандальному видеоролику "Невинность мусульман" // Сайт прокуратуры ХМАО - Югры. 2012. September 20.
Прокуратурой округа приняты меры по предотвращению распространения в сети Интернет видеофильма "Невинность мусульман" // Сайт прокуратуры Чукотского автономного округа. 2012. September 20.
В Хабаровске приняли меры против распространения фильма о пророке // РИА Новости. 2012. September 20.
Хабаровские провайдеры не собираются блокировать доступ к YouTube // Русская служба новостей. 2012. September 20.
Прокуратура Бурятии предписывает ограничить доступ к YouTube // Номер один (Бурятия). 2012. September 20.
Органы прокуратуры Мурманской области требуют ограничить доступ к скандальному видеоролику «Невинность мусульман» // Сайт прокуратуры Мурманской области. 2012. September 20.
Прокуратурой края обеспечено ограничение доступа к материалам экстремистского содержания // Сайт прокуратуры Ставропольского края. 2012. September 20.
Органы прокуратуры Ивановской области принимают меры к предотвращению распространения в сети Интернет видеофильма Невинность мусульман (Невинность ислама) // Сайт прокуратуры Ивановской области. 2012. September 20.
Прокуратурой края приняты меры по пресечению распространения видеофильма «Невиновность мусульман» и недопущения нарушений прав граждан // Полуостров Камчатка. 2012. September 20.
Прокуратура г.Санкт-Петербурга объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремистской деятельности и необходимости блокирования доступа пользователей к просмотру видеофильма "Невинность мусульман" // Сайт прокуратуры Санкт-Петербурга. 2012. September 20.
Прокуратура Татарстана добилась блокировки доступа к одной из интернет-страниц за пропаганду экстремистской организации // Интерфакс. 2012. September 20.
В «ВКонтакте» за экстремизм заблокирована страница группы «Национал-большевики Татарстана» // Татар-информ. 2012. September 20.
Прокуратура области объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона руководителям 34 интернет-провайдеров региона // Сайт прокуратуры Белгородской области. 2012. September 20.
Приморье присоединилось к борьбе с "Невинностью мусульман" // Байкал 24. 2012. 21 сентября.
Прокуратура Калужской области объявила предостережения о недопустимости нарушения закона руководителям восьми Интернет-провайдеров // Сайт прокуратуры Калужской области. 2012. September 21.
Доступ к фильму "Невинность мусульман" ограничивают уже в шести регионах СЗФО // Lenizdat.Ru. 2012. September 21.
Прокуратура Удмуртии потребовала заблокировать доступ к фильму «Невинность мусульман» // Проект "Сусанин". 2012. September 21.
Прокуратура требует закрыть для курских пользователей интернета доступ к видеофильму «Невинность мусульман» // 46ТВ. 2012. September 21.
Прокуратурой республики принимаются меры направленные на блокирование доступа к интернет-ресурсам, на которых размещен видеофильм «Невинность мусульман» // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Северная Осетия – Алания. 2012. September 21.
Органами прокуратуры области принимаются меры к недопущению распространения в сети Интернет материалов, содержащих признаки экстремизма // Сайт прокуратуры Вологодской области. 2012. 24 сентября.
О мерах по предупреждению нарушении законодательства о противодействии экстремистской деятельности // Сайт прокуратуры Красноярского края. 2012. 24 сентября.
Прокуратура Чеченской Республики вынесла предупреждение мобильным операторам // Сайт прокуратуры Чеченской Республики. 2012. 24 сентября.
Муслим Ибрагимов. Два провайдера в Чечне заблокировали доступ на YouTube из-за "Невинности мусульман" // Кавказский узел. 2012. 24 сентября.
Один из интернет-провайдеров Дагестана заблокировал доступ в "YouTube" // Интерфакс-Религия. 2012. 24 сентября.
Роман Дорохов, Дмитрий Дмитриенко. Кадыров пригрозил операторам связи санкциями за отказ блокировать YouTube // Ведомости. 2012 24 сентября.
Прокурор объявил предостережения интернет-провайдерам // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Карелия. 2012. September 25.
Прокуратура Республики Татарстан объявила предостережения руководителям 61 интернет-провайдера о недопустимости распространения экстремистских материалов // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Татарстан. 2012. September 25.
Угличская прокуратура предостерегла оператора связи от нарушений законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Ярославской области. 2012. September 25.
Смоляне не узнают о невинности мусульман // О чем говорит Смоленск. 2012. September 26.
«ВКонтакте» удалил фильм «Невинность мусульман»: убого, малобюджетно, недискуссионно // Газета.Ru. 2012. September 27.
Ксения Бурменко, Алена Ларина."Большая тройка" на Юге заблокировала доступ к Youtube // Российская газета. 2012. September 27.
«Большая тройка» операторов России блокирует YouTube // BFM.Ru. 2012. September 27.
Рыбинских интернет-провайдеров вызвали в прокуратуру // Ярновости. 2012. September 28.
Бурятия заблокировала доступ к сайту "Свидетелей Иеговы" // Мой Улан-Удэ. 2012. September 28.
Карточка дела № 2-2158/2012 ~ М-1750/2012 // Советский районный суд Улан-Удэ. 2012.
Прокуратура Томской области приняла меры, направленные на предотвращение распространения в сети интернет материалов, содержащих признаки экстремизма // Сайт прокуратуры Томской области. 2012. October 1.
В г. Костроме после вмешательства прокуратуры ООО "КГТС" установлены ограничения доступа к видеофильму "Невинность мусульман" // Сайт прокуратуры Костромской области. 2012. October 1.
Прокуратурой Ипатовского района предъявлены в суд исковые заявления об ограничении доступа на сайты, на которых содержатся экстремистские материалы, а также объявления о продаже водительских удостоверений // Сайт прокуратуры Ставропольского края. 2012. October 1.
Прокуратура Астраханской области объявила предостережения руководителям 10 интернет-провайдеров о недопустимости распространения экстремистских материалов // Сайт прокуратуры Астраханской области. 2012. October 1.
Прокуратура Советского района г. Иванова потребовала от провайдера ограничить доступ к сайтам религиозной организации «Свидетели Иеговы» // Сайт прокуратуры Ивановской области. 2012. October 1.
Ряд провайдеров в Краснодарском крае заблокировали YouTube // Никита Серебрянников. Caucasian Knot. 2012. October 1.
Экстремизм не пройдет! // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Мордовия. 2012. October 2.
Интернет-провайдеры на Алтае закрыли доступ к библиотеке "Либрусек" // Forbes. 2012. October 3.
В Еврейской автономной области прокуратура требует ограничить доступ в сети Интернет к видеофильму "Невинность мусульман" // Сайт прокуратуры Еврейской автономной области. 2012. 4 октября.
47 интернет-провайдерам региона рекомендовали закрыть доступ к фильму «Невинность мусульман» // Парк Гагарина (Самара). 2012. 5 октября.
Прокуратура Башкирии требует заблокировать фильм о пророке // РИА Новости. 2012. 8 октября.
Прокуратура Стерлитамака требует заблокировать "Невинность мусульман" // Стерлеград. 2012. October 9.
Прокуратура г.Тулы объявила предостережения Интернет-провайдерам о недопустимости нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремизму // Прокуратура Тульской области. 2012. October 12.
В Приморском крае суд удовлетворил требования прокурора по созданию ограничения доступа к материалам с признаками экстремизма, размещенным в сети Интернет // Сайт прокуратуры Приморского края. 2012. October 11.
Прокуратурой Астраханской области в районные суды г. Астрахани направлены исковые заявления об ограничении доступа к фильму «Невинность мусульман» («Невинность ислама», англ. «Innocence of Muslims») // Прокуратура Астраханской области. 2012. October 12.
Прокуратурой Брюховецкого района проведена проверка соблюдения законодательства о противодействии экстремизму в образовательных учреждениях // Сайт прокуратуры Краснодарского края. 2012. November 6.
Прокуратурой Новоалександровского района проведена проверка исполнения законодательства об ограничении доступа к информации экстремистского характера // Сайт прокуратуры Ставропольского края. 2012. November 19.
Прокуратура требует от провайдеров ограничить доступ к сайтам, на которых размещены экстремистские книги // Сайт прокуратуры Самарской области. 2012. December 4.
Школьники Лев-Толстовского района имели доступ к экстремистскому сайту // Сайт прокуратуры Липецкой области. 2012. 25 декабря.
По иску прокурора ОАО «ВымпелКом» ограничен доступ к материалам экстремистского содержания // Сайт прокуратуры Архангельской области. 2013. January 24.
Ограничен доступ к сайту, размещающему экстремистские материалы // Сайт прокуратуры Самарской области. 2013. 21 марта.
Прокуратура принимает меры по противодействию экстремизму в сети Интернет // Сайт прокуратуры Ульяновской области. 2013. 21 марта.
Доступ к сайтам экстремистской направленности ограничен // Сайт прокуратуры Свердловской области. 2013. 28 марта.
Прокуратуры принимает меры по пресечению доступа учащихся к материалам экстремистского содержания // Сайт прокуратуры Липецкой области. 2013. 3 апреля.
Прокуратурой Кировского района г. Уфы в суд направлены исковые заявления об ограничении доступа к интернет-сайтам // Сайт прокуратуры Кировского района Уфы. 2013. 10 апреля.
Прокуратурой Московского района приняты меры по пресечению распространения информации, включенной в Федеральный список экстремистских материалов // Сайт прокуратуры Нижегородской области. 2013. 15 апреля.
Прокуратура Лаганского района обязала образовательные учреждения района и Интернет-провайдера ограничить доступ к информациям, несовместимым с задачами образования и воспитания детей // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Калмыкия. 2013. April 17.
По искам прокуратуры суд обязал провайдеров ограничить доступ к официальным сайтам террористической организации // Сайт прокуратуры Самарской области. 2013. April 18.
В городе Владивостоке по требованию прокуратуры с локального видеохостинга развлекательного портала удалены видеоролики, внесенные в список экстремистских материалов // Сайт прокуратуры Приморского края. 2013. 24 апреля.
Доступ к сайту экстремисткой направленности будет ограничен // Сайт прокуратуры Свердловской области. 2013. May 27.
По результатам прокурорской проверки соблюдения законодательства о противодействии экстремистской деятельности руководитель организации привлечен к административной ответственности // Сайт прокуратуры Чувашской Республики. 2013. 3 июня.
В Краснодаре суд удовлетворил требования прокурора города об ограничении доступа к интернет-сайтам с экстремистскими материалами // Сайт прокуратуры Краснодарского края. 2013. 13 июня.
Прокуратура города Сургута потребовала от провайдеров ограничить доступ к сайтам в сети Интернет с экстремистскими материалами // Сайт прокуратуры ХМАО. 2013. 24 июня.
В результате принятых прокуратурой Дубенского района мер в образовательных учреждениях прекращен доступ на сайты, информационное содержание которых не связано с целями образовательного процесса // Прокуратура Тульской области. 2013. 27 июня.
По требованию прокуратуры области доступ к интернет-сайтам, содержащим экстремистские материалы, ограничен // Сайт прокуратуры Новгородской области. 2013. July 11.
Кировским районным судом города Самары ограничен доступ к сайту, размещающему экстремистские материалы // Сайт прокуратуры Самарской области. 2013. 19 июля.
Прокуратурой Новоалександровского района проведена проверка исполнения законодательства о противодействии терроризму // Сайт прокуратуры Ставропольского края. 2013. 25 сентября.
Волгоградский суд обязал «Ростелеком» ограничить доступ школьников к сомнительным сайтам // Волгоградское деловое телевидение. 2013. October 15.
Прокуратурой Новоалександровского района проведена проверка в сфере законодательства о противодействии терроризму // Прокуратура Ставропольского края. 2013. October 17.
Алексей Ходорыч. Черная пятница для "Мир тесен" // РБКdaily. 2013. November 5.
В результате принятия мер прокурорского реагирования в Эвенкийском районе ограничен доступ к экстремистскому сайту // Сайт прокуратуры Красноярского края. 2013. November 13.
Прокуратура требует от интернет-провайдеров прекратить способствовать экстремизму // Сайт прокуратуры Ульяновской области. 2013. 18 ноября.
По требованию прокуратуры Аургазинского района ограничен доступ к сайту, содержащему экстремистские материалы // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Башкортостан. 2013. December 5.
Прокурор Кашарского района через суд добился ограничения доступа к Интернет-сайтам, содержащим экстремистские материалы // Сайт прокуратуры Ростовской области. 2014. 18 февраля.
Роскомнадзор объяснил, почему оператор «Акадо» закрыл доступ к Youtube // World-IT.ru. 2014. 8 марта.
Ограничен доступ к ряду интернет-ресурсов, распространявших призывы к несанкционированным массовым мероприятиям // Сайт Федеральной службы по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзора). 2014. 13 марта.
В Волгоградской области владелец кафе оштрафован за доступ детьми запрещенных сайтов // Известия Волга-Каспий. 2014. 18 марта.
Посадский инет. Экстремистские материалы // Радио Посад (Сергиев Посад). 2014. March 26.
Педагогический и медицинский колледжи обязали ограничить доступ к экстремистской литературе // Блокнот (Волгодонск). 2014. April 1.
За что "Ростелеком" заблокировал сайт "Копейского рабочего"? // Копейский рабочий. 2014. April 2.
Прокуратурой г. Новочебоксарска выявлены факты непринятия Интернет-провайдерами мер по ограничению доступа к экстремистским материалам // Сайт прокуратуры Чувашской области. 2014. April 2.
Прокуратурой Калининского района г. Чебоксары выявлены нарушения законодательства о противодействии экстремистской деятельности // Сайт прокуратуры Чувашской республики. 2014. 11 апреля.
«Ростелеком» оптом заблокировал сайты Навального по решению барнаульского суда // TJournal.com. 2014. April 29.
Выборгская городская прокуратура потребовала запретить доступ к запрещенным сайтам // Сайт прокуратуры Ленинградской области. 2013. 3 июня.
Прокуратура через суд добилась ограничения доступа к Интернет-ресурсам, содержащим экстремистские материалы // Сайт прокуратуры Пермского края. 2014. 27 июня.
Прокуратура организует противодействие экстремизму в сети Интернет // Сайт прокуратуры Ульяновской области. 2014. 14 июля.
Прокуратура требует от интернет-провайдеров прекратить способствовать распространению экстремизма // Сайт прокуратуры Ульяновской области. 2014. July 22.
В Ставропольском крае по требованию прокуратуры в кафе ограничен для детей доступ к ряду сайтов // Сайт прокуратуры Ставропольского края. 2014. 26 августа.
По требованию прокуратуры блокирован доступ пользователей к экстремистским материалам, размещенным в сети Интернет // Сайт прокуратуры Липецкой области. 2014. September 4.
Директор ООО санаторий-профилакторий "Уральские зори" привлечен к административной ответственности за нарушения законодательства о несовершеннолетних и молодежи // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Удмуртия. 2014. September 8.
Прокуратура противодействует экстремизму в сети Интернет // Сайт прокуратуры Ульяновской области. 2014. 5 ноября.
Прокуратура обеспечивает противодействие экстремизму в сети Интернет // Сайт прокуратуры Ульяновской области. 2014. 19 ноября.
Суд Йошкар-Олы потребовал от интернет-провайдеров закрыть доступ к книжному сайту // Городской интернет-портал Йошкар-Олы. 2014. 25 ноября.
Наталья Пуртова. Вступило в силу решение суда об ограничении доступа к информации экстремистского содержания // Сайт прокуратуры Республики Марий Эл. 2014. 24 ноября.