On January 28, 2008, Adylsh Bakhteev, a resident of Syzran (Samara Region), was found guilty under Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (incitement of national, racial, religious hatred) and sentenced to 1 suspended sentence with a probationary period of 1 year. A. Bakhteev equipped at home a place for worship, as well as a library, where he gathered groups of Muslims, among whom he publicly propagated religious hatred.

The Karelian regional public organization "Islamic education" calls on the Russians to turn to the President of the Russian Federation with a request to facilitate the revision of court decisions, on the basis of which the Federal List of Extremist Materials is compiled . in it Muslims consider it unreasonable to include some books on Islamic topics . Here is the text of the appeal in full: "Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!

On January 29, journalist and public figure Khalida Khamidullina filed a complaint with the Moscow prosecutor's office in connection with insulting the feelings of Muslim believers and inciting hatred on the basis of religious affiliation. According to this document, Priest Daniil Sysoev systematically publicly insulted Islam and the Prophet Muhammad. Kh.

On January 29, Mikhail Teodorovich, head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service for the Nizhny Novgorod Region, told the RIA-Novosti news agency that Coca-Cola had removed from the streets of Nizhny Novgorod all advertisements using Orthodox symbols that offended the feelings of believers. “As a rule, violation of the law in the field of advertising occurs due to voluntary delusion. In the case of Coca-Cola, experts did not see malicious intent.

On January 29, 2008, the Moscow City Court selected a jury panel to consider the criminal case on the explosion at the Cherkizovsky market in Moscow on August 21, 2006. The court selected 12 main and eight reserve jurors. Recall that there are 8 people in the dock: Nikolai Korolev, Oleg Kostarev, Valery Zhukovtsev and Ilya Tikhomirov, accused under Part 2 of Art. 205 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (terrorism), part 3 of Art.

On January 28, 2008, a meeting was held in Krasnodar following the results of the work of the prosecutor's office of the Southern Federal District in 2007, as well as the definition of tasks for the period of the election campaign for the election of the President of the Russian Federation. During the meeting, it was noted that "issues of combating extremism and terrorism" remain topical in the coming year.

On January 28, 2008, the prosecutor's office of the Voronezh region published the results of work on "countering extremist activity" in 2007. In 2007, the prosecutor's office organized and conducted 275 inspections of compliance with anti-extremism legislation, brought 351 protests against legal acts that did not comply with the law, submitted 105 proposals to eliminate the identified violations, and issued 41 warnings about the inadmissibility of violations of the law.

On January 29, 2008, a presentation of the report “Radical nationalism in Russia and counteraction to it in 2007” prepared by the SOVA Center took place at the Independent Press Center. The presentation was attended by Galina Kozhevnikova , author of the report, deputy director of the SOVA Center, and Alexander Verkhovsky , author of a review of anti-extremist legislation, director of the SOVA Center.

On January 25, the Muslim community of Voronezh received the status of a legal entity in the department of Rosregistration. The previously operating organization of Muslims was deprived of registration by a court decision more than three years ago due to a number of violations. The activity of the community was terminated due to non-compliance with the rules and conditions of registration.

On January 28, 2008, the Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of Adygea canceled the verdict of the Maykop City Court against student Viktor Milkov, who had posted a Nazi video on the Internet, "for leniency of punishment". The protest against the decision of the court of first instance was appealed by the public prosecutor.