On July 22, 2015, in the Astrakhan region, material from the Internet was recognized as extremist.

Two activists of “God’s Will” were fined 1 thousand rubles for the pogrom in Manege. The prosecutor's office refused to initiate a criminal case against Enteo. On September 7, 2015, it became known that the prosecutor’s office refused to initiate criminal proceedings against the police against the leader of the Orthodox movement “God’s Will” Dmitry Tsorionov (Enteo), who, together with a support group, staged a pogrom at an exhibition of Soviet sculptures in Manege.

Where to put a comma in this sentence, I I personally have no doubts. And I know that many, with whom on most others questions I have no discrepancies, also have no doubts about it, only, I'm afraid, not everyone will choose the same as me. I want to offer to the attention of readers is one very unique case under Article 282 of the Criminal code, the example of which shows that despite the extensive illegal law enforcement practice is not so simple.

Employees of the St. Petersburg rehabilitation center "Contact", working with minors who find themselves in a difficult situation, in in accordance with the official order must participate in the procession 12 September 2015 and bring a few teenagers with you. On September 8, 2015 it became known that employees of the City Center for Social Programs and Prevention of Antisocial Phenomena among Youth "Contact", subordinated to the Committee on Youth Policy of St.

On September 2, 2015, the prosecutor's office of the Zarechensky district of the city of Tula opened an administrative case against the father of a minor in connection with the placement of extremist materials on the Internet. The prosecutor's office during the audit found on the page of a minor user of the social network "VKontakte" photos with a Nazi swastika, as well as an audio recording of a piece of music, the text of which is included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials.

On September 8, 2015, in Moscow it became known that the investigation had been completed against one of the leaders of the Russian Association, Alexander Belov (Potkin). As stated by lawyer Ivan Mironov, A. Belov was charged in the final version with creating an extremist community with the aim of overthrowing the constitutional system of Kazakhstan, inciting national hatred and public calls for extremist activities, as well as money laundering.

In Grozny, an administrative case on the distribution of extremist materials against the owner of an Islamic goods store was brought to court. September 8, 2015 it became known about the administrative case under Art. 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (dissemination of extremist materials), initiated in against Fariza Ustarkhanova, a resident of Grozny, owner of an Islamic goods. The case was sent to the Staropromyslovsky District Court of Grozny for consideration on the merits.

On August 7, 2015, a court in the Nizhny Novgorod Region sentenced a local resident to corrective labor for a video posted on a social network. On August 7, 2015, the Bogorodsk City Court delivered a guilty verdict against a local resident under Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code (inciting national hatred).

On September 7, 2015, Alexander Nikonov was sentenced in Tula for xenophobic materials on the Internet. "In contact with". On September 7, 2015, the Proletarsky District Court of the city of Tula delivered a guilty verdict to the previously convicted 27-year-old Alexander Nikonov. The court found him guilty under Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code (inciting national hatred or enmity).

On July 23, 2015, a resident of the village of Nikolaevka in the Oktyabrsky district of Saransk was convicted for xenophobic videos posted on the VKontakte social network. On July 23, 2015, the Oktyabrsky District Court of the city of Saransk found a 21-year-old resident of the village of Nikolaevka in the Oktyabrsky District, Dmitry Timofeev, guilty under Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code (inciting national hatred).

Moscow Automobile Plant No. 3 disputes the provision of Russian Orthodox church site for the construction of a modular church. Previous treaty on the lease and improvement of this site was concluded with the car factory. On September 8, 2015, it became known that the Moscow Since 2014, Avtokombinat No. 3 has been trying to challenge the decision to allocate site for the construction of the temple in the framework of the "Program-200".