Lipetsk activist of the "Russian United National Alliance" Maxim Tsurashenko on February 10, police officers handed a subpoena to the court. against Tsurashenko They explained that an administrative offense case was initiated due to the publication on social networks of the old symbols of RONA - the St. George Cross on a black-yellow-white cloth.

Police in Nevyansk detained a former orphanage resident, 30-year-old Arkady Kovalenko, who, in protest against the eviction of his family with a one and a half year old child, pitched a tent in front of the city hall. This was reported on February 10 by Znak. “We decided to put up a tent to draw attention to our problem,” Kovalenko explained to the publication, already at the police station.

The delayed on the afternoon of February 10, activist Dinar Idrisov left the police department. This is reported on Facebook by Irina Yatsenko. Almost all the time that the activist conducted in the police department, he led a live broadcast on Facebook. Idrisov was detained about twelve in the afternoon for holding a single picket of solidarity with Ildar Dadin at the building of the Constitutional Court.

Activist Dinar Idrisov, who was detained in St. Petersburg near the building of the Constitutional Court (CC), is not allowed to have a lawyer. The activist told OVD-Info about this by phone. Idrisov was detained at about 12:30, during a one-man picket in support of Ildar Dadin. The activist was taken to police station No.

Photo: David Frenkel On February 10, an activist Dinar Idrisov was detained near the building of the Constitutional Court in St. Petersburg, he held in his hands a poster “We need freedom”. It is reported by "Mediazona" with reference to the photographer David Frenkel. Today, the Constitutional Court announced the decision on the complaint of Ildar Dadin repeated violation of the rules for rally (212.1 of the Criminal Code).

The Constitutional Court decided that Ildar Dadin’s sentence for repeated violation of the rules of holding a rally (Article 212.1 of the Criminal Code) should be reviewed. This decision is due to the fact that at the time of consideration of Dadin’s criminal case, decisions on his administrative offenses had not yet entered into force, and criminal liability for violating the procedure for organizing rallies must be adequate to the social danger of the act.

Well-known LGBT activists Reida Lynn and Sofia Grozovskaya announced on February 9 that they had been granted official refugee status in France. The LGBT family asked for asylum on August 17, 2016. The last time Reida Lynn and several other activists were detained was at a May Day march in Moscow for wearing rainbow symbols.

The Constitutional Court of Russia has recognized the legal application of criminal liability for violating the rules of holding rallies. Interfax is about this. writes The court recognized that criminal liability for violating the rules of holding rallies is consistent with the Constitution if it is used to protect the rights of citizens. The Constitutional Court also recognized legal criminal liability for three violations of the rules for holding rallies within 180 days.

On February 9, the Supreme Court Collegium for Military Affairs refused to satisfy the appeal against the sentence of Marcel Gabbasov, convicted of involvement in the activities of the banned organization Hizb ut-Tahrir. This was reported by the SOVA information and research center.

On February 9, it became known that the Polyarny District Court (Murmansk Region) fined Andrey Eliseev, Chairman of the Committee of the local religious organization of Jehovah's Witnesses Snezhnogorsk, for possession of extremist materials for the purpose of their mass distribution (Article 20.29 of the Code of Administrative Offenses). This was reported by the information and analytical center "Sova" with reference to the regional prosecutor's office.

On February 10, the Constitutional Court made a decision on the complaint of activist Ildar Dadin, convicted of repeated violation of rallies (Article 212.1 of the Criminal Code). The court recognized the contested article to constitutional, but obliged the legislators to amend it, and Dadin’s criminal case to send for a new consideration. The Constitutional Court said that criminal liability for violations at public events should be comparable to the public danger of an act.